Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
> What tcsh has is powerful command completion, which I believeDebian doesn't
> setup by default. For example, one could program tcsh such that it knew
> all the options to the `dpkg' command.
zsh has this too, but it uses sh syntax. There's
pgp5YMby2QHgX.pgp
Description: PGP message
"Graham C. Hughes" wrote:
> and tcsh fixes several of the traditional csh bugs. I still think
> bash is a better shell to use, but then I don't believe in csh and
> derivatives.
What tcsh has is powerful command completion, which I believeDebian doesn't
setup by default. For example, one cou
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, David Miles wrote:
> I appreciate your response.
>
> Another question or so:
>
> 1) Are shells geared toward specific tasks?... such as program creation, a
> shell built to specifically offer enhanced compiling and program
> generation capabilities? another perhaps for gra
> "George" == George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sez:
George> For me, I hate the C shell and like Korn or bash (bash is
George> the second incarnation of the Bourne shell ... bash stands
George> for Bourne again shell).
George> You have the c shell (csh) the bourne shell (sh) b
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, David Miles wrote:
> I appreciate your response.
>
> Another question or so:
>
> 1) Are shells geared toward specific tasks?... such as program creation, a
> shell built to specifically offer enhanced compiling and program
> generation capabilities? another perhaps for gra
David Miles wrote:
>
> C shell, borne shell, ?? shell, etc.
In Linux (and other UNIX syyle systems) each user has a choice of which
shell to use. sh, the Bourne shell is the original shell and is used
for the shell scripts in /etc/init.d which initialize the system at
boot time. bash, the born a
> 1) Are shells geared toward specific tasks?... such as program creation, a
> shell built to specifically offer enhanced compiling and program
> generation capabilities? another perhaps for graphics of some sort?
Not particularly. sh was the original Bourne shell; I think it was the
first of t
pertise. Hope this helps.
> >
> > Dennis
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, David Miles wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 07:13:52 -0600 (MDT)
> > > From: David Miles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
-0600 (MDT)
> > From: David Miles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: terminology/concept questions
> > Resent-Date: 27 Jun 1997 21:59:50 -
> > Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Resent-cc: recipient.list.not.
d have a lot of features that can take a years to
expertise. Hope this helps.
Dennis
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, David Miles wrote:
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 07:13:52 -0600 (MDT)
> From: David Miles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: terminology/concept questi
C shell, borne shell, ?? shell, etc.
in simple terms, would someone briefly explain to me what these terms
mean, please?
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
12 matches
Mail list logo
