On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 04:11, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 22:50:43 +0800, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > This is when you should head off to http://bugs.debian.org/ and see if
> > the bug is already reported. If not, file it yourself.
>
> Thanks. I did. The answer came a day later:
>
> > The
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 22:50:43 +0800, Rob Weir wrote:
> This is when you should head off to http://bugs.debian.org/ and see if
> the bug is already reported. If not, file it yourself.
Thanks. I did. The answer came a day later:
> The absence of a package from testing is not a bug.
I'm a newbie i
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 22:50:43 +0800, Rob Weir wrote:
> This is when you should head off to http://bugs.debian.org/ and see if
> the bug is already reported. If not, file it yourself.
Thanks. I did. The answer came a day later:
> The absence of a package from testing is not a bug.
I'm a newbie i
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 22:50:43 +0800, Rob Weir wrote:
> This is when you should head off to http://bugs.debian.org/ and see if
> the bug is already reported. If not, file it yourself.
Thanks. I did. The answer came a day later:
> The absence of a package from testing is not a bug.
I'm a newbie i
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 09:12:17PM +0800, Uwe Dippel said
> Plain upgrade von Woody to something more stable than unstable using
> apt-get dist-upgrade went smoothly, but left me without much on the
> desktop. So I issued another
>
> # apt-get update
> # apt-get upgrade
> #tasksel
>
> resulted in
Plain upgrade von Woody to something more stable than unstable using
apt-get dist-upgrade went smoothly, but left me without much on the
desktop. So I issued another
# apt-get update
# apt-get upgrade
#tasksel
resulted in:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
evolution: Depends: lib
6 matches
Mail list logo
