On 1/26/06, Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Kirchner wrote:
> > On 1/26/06, Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>You can play with things as you like, but I wouldn't do it.
> >>I had problems with LVM and got rid of it. Over on Fedora,
> >>I've only seen one say "I'm glad
David Kirchner wrote:
On 1/26/06, Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You can play with things as you like, but I wouldn't do it.
I had problems with LVM and got rid of it. Over on Fedora,
I've only seen one say "I'm glad I used LVM", but on a regular
basis someone gets bitten.
Agreed. I
On 1/26/06, Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can play with things as you like, but I wouldn't do it.
> I had problems with LVM and got rid of it. Over on Fedora,
> I've only seen one say "I'm glad I used LVM", but on a regular
> basis someone gets bitten.
Agreed. I haven't used LVM, b
Matt Price wrote:
my /dev/hda is getting a little flaky, so I am replacing it with a new
one. I also am tired of constantly juggling partitions around ( I
made too many when I setthis ocmputer up) so I am looking to try out
lvm. I've set up a new disk as follows:
[snip]
You can play with t
my /dev/hda is getting a little flaky, so I am replacing it with a new
one. I also am tired of constantly juggling partitions around ( I
made too many when I setthis ocmputer up) so I am looking to try out
lvm. I've set up a new disk as follows:
Device Boot Start End Block
5 matches
Mail list logo