Re: WIRELESS supported NIC's? was Re: supported nics

On Monday 22 March 2004 23.20, Carl Fink wrote: > Anyone care to recommend a PCI 802.11 NIC? G is ideal, but since I'm > basically sharing a 4 megabit cable modem connection, B is also fine. Speaking of wireless: I'm looking for 54Mbps adaptors that work with hostap - I have a dedicated router,

Re: WIRELESS supported NIC's? was Re: supported nics

Ralph Crongeyer wrote: On Monday 22 March 2004 05:20 pm, Carl Fink wrote: Try a D-Link 530TX from BestBuy or Circuit City, their like $15 bucks. If you have discover running during boot it should even load the module for you. That's a wireless card?!? ;-) Anyone care to recommend a PCI 802.11 NI

Re: WIRELESS supported NIC's? was Re: supported nics

Carl Fink wrote: Anyone care to recommend a PCI 802.11 NIC? G is ideal, but since I'm basically sharing a 4 megabit cable modem connection, B is also fine. Thanks. I can say that don't buy Proxim stuff. I had a very bad experience with them. Never tried D-Link products but right now I am usin

Re: WIRELESS supported NIC's? was Re: supported nics

On Monday 22 March 2004 05:20 pm, Carl Fink wrote: Try a D-Link 530TX from BestBuy or Circuit City, their like $15 bucks. If you have discover running during boot it should even load the module for you. Ralph > Anyone care to recommend a PCI 802.11 NIC? G is ideal, but since I'm > basically sh

WIRELESS supported NIC's? was Re: supported nics

Anyone care to recommend a PCI 802.11 NIC? G is ideal, but since I'm basically sharing a 4 megabit cable modem connection, B is also fine. Thanks. -- Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Dueling Modems Computer Forum -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: supported nics

James LeClair wrote: hey all. what network cards are recomended for using with woody ( or sarge for that matter )? i have a couple that work right now and am about to set up a few new boxes and was wondering what the least botherome nics are. thanks these "just work" out of the box:

Re: supported nics

James LeClair wrote: hey all. what network cards are recomended for using with woody ( or sarge for that matter )? i have a couple that work right now and am about to set up a few new boxes and was wondering what the least botherome nics are. thanks these "just work" out of the box:

Re: supported nics

On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 01:45:28AM -0400, James LeClair wrote: > hey all. what network cards are recomended for using with woody ( or > sarge for that matter )? i have a couple that work right now and am > about to set up a few new boxes and was wondering what the least > botherome nics are. >

supported nics

hey all. what network cards are recomended for using with woody ( or sarge for that matter )? i have a couple that work right now and am about to set up a few new boxes and was wondering what the least botherome nics are. thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

RE: Best Debian-supported NICs? Also, firewalling help?

-kpkg, which I found referenced mainly in the FAQMatic as www.deb.org. I'm "in the process" myself. Good luck, Hank -Original Message- From: Kendall P. Bullen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 1998 9:26 PM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subjec

Re: Best Debian-supported NICs? Also, firewalling help?

On 1 Sep 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: : Hi, : : I am very happy with tulip based cards. There is an actively : developed set of drivers and other information at : http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/tulip.html. For the most part I agree - the tulip based cards are excellent.

Re: Best Debian-supported NICs? Also, firewalling help?

Hi, I am very happy with tulip based cards. There is an actively developed set of drivers and other information at http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/tulip.html. manoj /* tulip.c: A DEC 21040-family ethernet driver for Linux. */ /* Written 1994-1998 by Donald Bec

Best Debian-supported NICs? Also, firewalling help?

Hiya, I'm setting up a machine to act as a firewall or router or something (not sure what the exact term is -- basically, to allow only certain Internet IPs to get to a machine that will be behind this firewall-or-whatever). As such, I was planning on two NICs and having a Debian system that does