Re: still no luck with ethernet between 2 computers

2000-12-25 Thread matthschulz
Am Montag, 25. Dezember 2000 14:21 schrieben Sie: > Matthias Schulz wrote: > > But eth seems not to be able to resolve that matthschulzg is 192.168.0.1. > > Yes it is in /etc/hosts though just as > > 192.168.0.1 matthschulzg. Is this correct? > > take out the period if it is in /et

Re: still no luck with ethernet between 2 computers

2000-12-25 Thread Nate Amsden
Matthias Schulz wrote: > The only difference I can see is 192.168.0.1.1026 vs. matthschulzg.1028. > The 1026 and 1028 are the prcessnumbers on 192.168.0.1 right? So they are > just to ignore!? looks like it yeah. > But eth seems not to be able to resolve that matthschulzg is 192.168.0.1. > Yes

Re: still no luck with ethernet between 2 computers

2000-12-25 Thread Matthias Schulz
Am Sonntag, 24. Dezember 2000 12:59 schrieb Nate Amsden: > try commenting out everything in /etc/hosts.deny > > and putting: > > ALL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > in /etc/hosts.allow Did it, no luck. > unix/linux seems to not to like to work in an enviornment where there is > no > DNS resolution, or mo

Re: still no luck with ethernet between 2 computers

2000-12-24 Thread Nate Amsden
try commenting out everything in /etc/hosts.deny and putting: ALL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] in /etc/hosts.allow unix/linux seems to not to like to work in an enviornment where there is no DNS resolution, or more specifically name resolution in general (i imagine there isn't in your case), if you want

still no luck with ethernet between 2 computers

2000-12-24 Thread Matthias Schulz
Hi all, I'm still out of luck with a ethernet-connection between 2 computers. Here are the facts: debian 2.2 Kernel, 2.2.18, Linksys ethernetcards (one PCI, one PCMCIA) crossover cable I can ping each other just fine. Same machines can telnet each other or nfs-mount directories when I use the pl