Re: static vs modules

2001-01-19 Thread David Wright
Quoting Jon Pennington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > I was wondering if there is a speed/operating difference when compiling > > > > kernel daemons like knfs static in the kernel or in modules. > It depends on what you're talking about. Take, for instance, the Intel > EtherExpressPro100 (eepro1

Re: static vs modules

2001-01-17 Thread Jon Pennington
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 09:23:49PM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Jon Pennington wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:22:43AM -0800, Xucaen wrote: > > > > > > --- Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > card. The card started dropping packets and > > > > causi

Re: static vs modules

2001-01-17 Thread Sebastiaan
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Jon Pennington wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:22:43AM -0800, Xucaen wrote: > > > > --- Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > card. The card started dropping packets and > > > causing collisions under only 50% of what the > > > interface would have been capab

Re: static vs modules

2001-01-17 Thread Jon Pennington
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:22:43AM -0800, Xucaen wrote: > > --- Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > card. The card started dropping packets and > > causing collisions under only 50% of what the > > interface would have been capable of if it were > > built-in to the kernel. > > I don't

Re: static vs modules

2001-01-17 Thread Xucaen
--- Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > card. The card started dropping packets and > causing collisions under only 50% of what the > interface would have been capable of if it were > built-in to the kernel. > why? xucaen __ Do You Yaho

Re: static vs modules

2001-01-17 Thread Erdmut Pfeifer
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 08:36:18AM -0800, Jon Pennington wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 08:17:25AM +, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:59:34PM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I was wondering if there is a speed/operating difference when compilin

Re: static vs modules

2001-01-17 Thread Jon Pennington
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 08:17:25AM +, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:59:34PM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I was wondering if there is a speed/operating difference when compiling > > > kernel daemons like knfs static in the kernel or in modules. > >

Re: static vs modules

2001-01-17 Thread Cliff Sarginson
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:59:34PM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I was wondering if there is a speed/operating difference when compiling > > kernel daemons like knfs static in the kernel or in modules. > > Anyone know something about this? > > I think there is no measurable (is t

Re: static vs modules

2001-01-17 Thread Thomas Guettler
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:59:34PM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering if there is a speed/operating difference when compiling > kernel daemons like knfs static in the kernel or in modules. > Anyone know something about this? I think there is no measurable (is this spelled righ

static vs modules

2001-01-16 Thread Sebastiaan
Hello, I was wondering if there is a speed/operating difference when compiling kernel daemons like knfs static in the kernel or in modules. Anyone know something about this? And does a module consume more memory than compiled static? Thanks, Sebastiaan