On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:54:55PM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Jo, 27 dec 12, 16:42:58, Joel Roth wrote:
> >
> > What *is* biting me is that the new multiarch organization
> > won't allow me to (re)install skype, which is expecting ia32-libs and
> > ia32-libs-gtk.
>
> Work for me (on wheezy
On Jo, 27 dec 12, 16:42:58, Joel Roth wrote:
>
> What *is* biting me is that the new multiarch organization
> won't allow me to (re)install skype, which is expecting ia32-libs and
> ia32-libs-gtk.
Work for me (on wheezy):
$ apt-cache show skype
Package: skype
Status: install ok installed
Priorit
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Joel Roth wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Joel Roth wrote:
> > > > I usually just upgrade apps individually as I need to...
> > >
> > > As in 'apt-get install openssh-client' ? But that won't upgrade any
> > > of the dependencies.
> >
> > I didn't know that. My first try w
Joel Roth wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Joel Roth wrote:
> > > I usually just upgrade apps individually as I need to...
> >
> > As in 'apt-get install openssh-client' ? But that won't upgrade any
> > of the dependencies.
>
> I didn't know that. My first try was apt-get install ssh.
If the pack
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Joel Roth wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Joel Roth wrote:
> > > > I'm just so used to the dependencies being taken
> > > > care of by APT, that I was surprised to have to
> > > > lift my little pinkie.
> > >
> > > Uhm... An 'apt-get upgrade' should have offered those for up
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> If anyone have suggestion to improve debian-reference to prevent
> people to take such strategy, let me know. Also, concrete case
> example of why such method is less safer than 'apt-get upgrade' or
> 'aptitude safe-upgrade', let us know.
I think this case is one example. By
Joel Roth wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Joel Roth wrote:
> > > I'm just so used to the dependencies being taken
> > > care of by APT, that I was surprised to have to
> > > lift my little pinkie.
> >
> > Uhm... An 'apt-get upgrade' should have offered those for upgrade.
> > They do for me. They d
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:48:00AM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 23 dec 12, 20:15:19, Joel Roth wrote:
> >
> > Ah, I didn't even think to try an apt-get upgrade.
> > I usually just upgrade apps individually as I need to...
> > an attitude based on (possibly) outdated fears of
> > getting
On Du, 23 dec 12, 20:15:19, Joel Roth wrote:
>
> Ah, I didn't even think to try an apt-get upgrade.
> I usually just upgrade apps individually as I need to...
> an attitude based on (possibly) outdated fears of
> getting stuck in between upgrades of C libraries
> or other large-scale brokenness.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:13:21PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Joel Roth wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > On Sid I have:
> > > openssh-client 1:6.0p1-3
> > > Depends: ... libssl1.0.0 (>= 1.0.1) ...
> > > Make sure that at the least both of those are up to date.
> >
> > Thanks for this sugge
Joel Roth wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > On Sid I have:
> > openssh-client 1:6.0p1-3
> > Depends: ... libssl1.0.0 (>= 1.0.1) ...
> > Make sure that at the least both of those are up to date.
>
> Thanks for this suggestion. Your intuition was right!
>
> I just needed to update openssh-client
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:36:02PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Joel Roth wrote:
> > Joel Roth wrote:
> > > $ git pull
> > > OpenSSL version mismatch. Built against 105f, you have 1000103f
> > > fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
> >
> > This error also occurs when I use ssh directly, to
12 matches
Mail list logo