It helps to explain things, Daniel, but truly, the client in question
is horrendously out of date and deprecated for all secure intents and
purposes, I'm quite happy to retire it from active support on my
server.
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 15:19:33 -0300, you wrote:
>Hi, Steve.
>
>On 14/01/16 13:10, Ste
Daniel,
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 14:50:20 -0300, you wrote:
>I'm sorry. I Had forgotten of the detail of the accessibility :(
No worries. Things are in a sorry state at the moment because of other
things I did without realizing I did them, but I've already told my
usership that Voyager will have to g
Hi, Steve.
On 14/01/16 13:10, Steve Matzura wrote:
> Failing connection:
> (...)
> no matching cipher found: client
> aes192-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,aes128-cbc,aes256-cbc,rijndael128-cbc,rijndael192-cbc,rijndael256-cbc,rijndael-...@lysator.liu.se,des-cbc,des-...@ssh.com
> server
> aes128-ctr,ae
Hi, Steve.
On 14/01/16 13:01, Steve Matzura wrote:
>> I do not know that client, but if your users are using Firefox, maybe
>> you could use FireFTP [1]. I never had problems with it, and we could
>> also say that while users use Firefox, you could run it on different
>> operating systems.
> It
The problem is that the older client doesn't support ciphers newer than CBC
and arcfour (both depreciated on the newer server versions of OpenSSH).
Lookup how to re-enable these suites using the Cipher directive.
One more piece of the puzzle. The working system is Red Hat Fedora 20,
the non-working one is Debian 8.2.
More info. I used getenforce' and found SELinux is installed but
disabled on the system where FTP Voyager can connect using SFTP over
ssh, and not installed at all on the system where FTP Voyager cannot
connect. In fact, using either the `getenforce' or `'sestatus' on the
no-connect system yields `
Daniel,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:05:36 -0300, you wrote:
>Hi, Steve.
>
>On 14/01/16 08:45, Steve Matzura wrote:
>
>> This is clearly the problem area. I tried some ssh option settings in
>> Voyager with no success. Should this client be retired? It's not
>> *that* old.
>
>I do not know that client,
I decided to put the two logs from `sshd -d' side-by-side to try to
figure out where the differences are. Both logs have the following
lines immediately after the connection request:
debug1: Client protocol version 2.0; client software version
FTP-Voyager-15.2.0.15
debug1: no match: FTP-Voyager-15
Hi, Steve.
On 14/01/16 08:45, Steve Matzura wrote:
> This is clearly the problem area. I tried some ssh option settings in
> Voyager with no success. Should this client be retired? It's not
> *that* old.
I do not know that client, but if your users are using Firefox, maybe
you could use FireFTP
Lars,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:45:09 +0200, you wrote:
>Can you update the client to one that uses the safer ciphers and avoids
>the deprecated ones?
You and I came to the same conclusion with the same lines of log as
evidence at about the same time. Amazing.
Many of my users use Voyager version
Tomas,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 05:32:04 -0500, I wrote:
>debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
>debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.7p1 Debian-5
>debug1: permanently_set_uid: 107/65534 [preauth]
>debug1: list_hostkey_types:
>ssh-rsa,ssh-dss,ecdsa-sha2-nistp256,ssh-ed25519 [p
On 01/14/2016 12:32 PM, Steve Matzura wrote:
> debug1: sshd version OpenSSH_6.7, OpenSSL 1.0.1k 8 Jan 2015
>...
> debug1: Client protocol version 2.0; client software version
> FTP-Voyager-15.2.0.15
> debug1: no match: FTP-Voyager-15.2.0.15
> debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
> .
Tomas,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 07:13:57PM -0500, Steve Matzura wrote:
>> I hope this isn't off-topic by too much. If it is, a word to me
>> privately and I'll wait for responses to queries I've made elsewhere.
>I'm not as much of an SSH guru to "get" what's going on by just reading
>configs, but a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 07:13:57PM -0500, Steve Matzura wrote:
> I hope this isn't off-topic by too much. If it is, a word to me
> privately and I'll wait for responses to queries I've made elsewhere.
>
> I maintain two FTP servers and support four Wi
I hope this isn't off-topic by too much. If it is, a word to me
privately and I'll wait for responses to queries I've made elsewhere.
I maintain two FTP servers and support four Windows-based FTP clients
for users of those servers--FTP Voyager, FlashFXP, Filezilla, and
WinSCP. One server accepts a
16 matches
Mail list logo
