I want to explore feasibility of a "bright idea" [snicker!].
I'm looking for relatively light weight end user application that will
run under 64 bit Debian 12.
The program's description would likely use the terms continuous and
large vocabulary. *HOWEVER* I would be happy initially if it could
On 5/22/21 6:10 PM, deloptes wrote:
As a two finger typist
: guess youtube have fantastic software providing SubTitles
rgds
.
Richard Owlett wrote:
> As a two finger typist I wish continuous speech recognition for note
> taking and composing emails. Unfortunately, the only end user speech
> recognition in Debian is Pocketsphinx which is command and control
> oriented.
>
> When I asked on debian-ac
Richard Owlett wrote:
> As a two finger typist I wish continuous speech recognition for note taking
> and composing emails. Unfortunately, the only end user speech recognition in
> Debian is Pocketsphinx which is command and control oriented.
Julius, for instance, https://github.c
As a two finger typist I wish continuous speech recognition for note
taking and composing emails. Unfortunately, the only end user speech
recognition in Debian is Pocketsphinx which is command and control oriented.
When I asked on debian-accessibility, I was pointed to Mozilla
Deepspeech
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 11:26 PM deloptes wrote:
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> .
> > Are there now end-user, Debian compatible, dictation applications that
> > do NOT require proprietary software nor internet connectivity? My
> > internet searching turned up primarily old material or tool-set pa
lowed speech recognition casually - but
not recently.
Are there now end-user, Debian compatible, dictation applications that
do NOT require proprietary software nor internet connectivity? My
internet searching turned up primarily old material or tool-set packages
packages aimed at programmers creating
On 2020-11-06 07:25, deloptes wrote:
Let me comment here my impressions. I studied speech processing and
wrote my
thesis on dialog systems in 2007. Until about 2005 there were still
some
open source tools like ViaVoice by IBM. Basically all of this was
dropped
by 2010 - no idea why - might be
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 08:25:36AM +0100, deloptes wrote:
[...]
> Again one of these topics, where people post about software they do not
> actually use.
In my case, that's true. I do follow the topic, but from some
safe distance.
> Let me comment here my impressions. I studied speech processin
Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm a lousy typist. Trying to make notes on a laptop does not work well
> because typing interrupts my train of thought.
>
> Many years ago when I was a Windows user and Dragon Naturally Speaking
> was in its initial release I followed speech recogn
y test the system,
but building
upon that is open to anyone. Having to deal with more interactive UX
is out of the
scope of the current target of those tools.
One of the links I went to explicitly referred to doing "real time"
speech recognition [it may have been written by an application developer].
More later.
Thank you.
g
upon that is open to anyone. Having to deal with more interactive UX is out of
the
scope of the current target of those tools.
One of the links I went to explicitly referred to doing "real time"
speech recognition [it may have been written by an application developer].
More later.
Thank you.
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 05:58:25PM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 04, 2020 12:36:51 PM Curt wrote:
> > Maybe this open source, Java (is that still a thing?) app that runs
> > on Linux:
> >
> > http://www.speech.cs.cmu.edu/sphinx/dictator/
>
> Yes, I believe that it is i
o implement speech recognition system. We are here to suggest you the easiest
way to start such an exciting world of speech recognition. Lately we
implemented a Kaldi on Android, providing much better accuracy for large
vocabulary decoding, which was hard to imagine before.
If you are interested
On Wednesday, November 04, 2020 12:36:51 PM Curt wrote:
> Maybe this open source, Java (is that still a thing?) app that runs
> on Linux:
>
> http://www.speech.cs.cmu.edu/sphinx/dictator/
Yes, I believe that it is it, but maybe I saw an earlier version (although the
web page listed above is copy
I was a Windows user and Dragon Naturally Speaking
>> was in its initial release I followed speech recognition casually - but
>> not recently.
>>
>> Are there now end-user, Debian compatible, dictation applications that
>> do NOT require proprietary software nor internet
ts initial release I followed speech recognition casually - but
> not recently.
>
> Are there now end-user, Debian compatible, dictation applications that
> do NOT require proprietary software nor internet connectivity? My
> internet searching turned up primarily old material or to
I'm a lousy typist. Trying to make notes on a laptop does not work well
because typing interrupts my train of thought.
Many years ago when I was a Windows user and Dragon Naturally Speaking
was in its initial release I followed speech recognition casually - but
not recently.
Are ther
epp!
I was trying to differentiate my preferences from mass market
products such as Dragon Naturally Speaking.
I've casually followed speech recognition since the 70's, though have
never actually used it.
The goals of CMU Sphinx far exceed how I'd actually use it. [E.G. I
don&#
eloper oriented. I'm looking
> for fairly basic information aimed at prospective user.
Good luck - it's a complex subject developed by "need to scratch", which
means that it's unlikely "simple dictation" is the primary development
objective.
>
> I
e casually followed speech recognition since the 70's, though
have never actually used it.
The goals of CMU Sphinx far exceed how I'd actually use it. [E.G.
I don't need speaker independence, continuous recognition, nor
real time. I'm not sure if "large vocabulary"
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 16:55, csj wrote:
> At Fri, 03 Oct 2003 15:52:30 -0500,
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > After doing an extensive Google search, and having seen many ques-
> > tions about it in mailing lists and Usenet, I know that native SR
> > for the Linux desktop is not availabl
I read the previous mails about this topic and I conclude that there are no
gpled programs of speech recognition. Isn't it?
And what about other AI gpl/free programs? Did anyone knows some?
I wonder if someone can tell me which is currently the more successful
algorithm for speech recogn
At Fri, 03 Oct 2003 15:52:30 -0500,
Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After doing an extensive Google search, and having seen many ques-
> tions about it in mailing lists and Usenet, I know that native SR
> for the Linux desktop is not available.
If by native you mean working like a champ, then, I
Hi,
After doing an extensive Google search, and having seen many ques-
tions about it in mailing lists and Usenet, I know that native SR
for the Linux desktop is not available.
Has anyone tried Windows SR programs (like Dragon Naturally Speaking
or ViaVoice) under Wine, CrossOver Office or Win4Li
don't even know
> what a JRE is. but i'd really like to get speech recognition working on my
> box.
>
> on the mirror ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/
> debian/dists/woody/non-free/binary-i386/
>
> there are the following p
dear all,
i'm trying to install viavoice (ibm's voice recognition engine) on my woody
system. viavoice requires "blackdown java JRE-1.2.2 rev RC4". other than
a few non-technical details, i know nothing about java. don't even know
what a JRE is. but i'd really
Having looked around, I'm pretty sure there's no decent speech
recognition for Linux around. Please please correct me if I'm
wrong!
But am I also right in thinking that running one of the windoze
speech rec packages under Wine wouldn't work?
What I -really- want is to b
Hi. I was just wondering whether Debian has a speech recognition program for
the shell or X Windows, it doesn't really matter. If any of you also use OS/2,
do you know of any speech recognition software available for that as well
(preferably free ;-) ?
Thanks in advance,
29 matches
Mail list logo
