On Mar 17, 2011 12:55 PM, "Eric Morey" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 17:25 +0100, Klistvud wrote:
> > Dne, 16. 03. 2011 15:15:51 je shawn wilson napisal(a):
> >
> > >
> > > Bitcoin IIRC.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks for the hint; didn't know about bitcoin. Looks promising.
> >
>
> Bitcoins are not conv
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 17:25 +0100, Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 16. 03. 2011 15:15:51 je shawn wilson napisal(a):
>
> >
> > Bitcoin IIRC.
> >
>
> Thanks for the hint; didn't know about bitcoin. Looks promising.
>
Bitcoins are not convertible to other currencies and practically no one
accepts them.
On 17 March 2011 06:04, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> on 22:36 Tue 15 Mar, Heddle Weaver (weaver2wo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On 15 March 2011 18:52, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> > > On Lu, 14 mar 11, 21:11:47, Rob Owens wrote:
> > > > I've seen posts like this on Freecycle, and they're almost always
>
On 17 March 2011 08:37, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> on 07:34 Wed 16 Mar, Heddle Weaver (weaver2wo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On 15 March 2011 23:40, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 03:11, Rob Owens wrote:
> > > > I've seen posts like this on Freecycle, and they're almost always
>
on 07:34 Wed 16 Mar, Heddle Weaver (weaver2wo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 15 March 2011 23:40, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 03:11, Rob Owens wrote:
> > > I've seen posts like this on Freecycle, and they're almost always spam
> > > or malware. I haven't looked at this link, and
on 22:36 Tue 15 Mar, Heddle Weaver (weaver2wo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 15 March 2011 18:52, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> > On Lu, 14 mar 11, 21:11:47, Rob Owens wrote:
> > > I've seen posts like this on Freecycle, and they're almost always spam
> > > or malware. I haven't looked at this link, and
Dne, 16. 03. 2011 15:15:51 je shawn wilson napisal(a):
Bitcoin IIRC.
Thanks for the hint; didn't know about bitcoin. Looks promising.
--
Cheerio,
Klistvud
http://bufferoverflow.tiddlyspot.com
Certifiable Loonix User #481801 Please reply to the list, not t
On Mar 16, 2011 8:38 AM, "Klistvud" wrote:
>
> Dne, 16. 03. 2011 05:57:38 je Heddle Weaver napisal(a):
>
>
>>
>> My pleasure. Actually why I posted it.
>> Thought it would make a good edition to the family, which, in time it
>> probably will be.
>> Just thought I'd get the news in.
>> Regards,
>>
Dne, 16. 03. 2011 05:57:38 je Heddle Weaver napisal(a):
My pleasure. Actually why I posted it.
Thought it would make a good edition to the family, which, in time it
probably will be.
Just thought I'd get the news in.
Regards,
Weaver.
+1
It's heart-warming to see that another proprietary, ob
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 23:34, Heddle Weaver wrote:
> I only use the service because it saves even short links like this one from
> getting broken by MUA character limits:
> http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2011/1/29/4737705.html
I think that is taking a minor issue (line wrappin
On 16 March 2011 09:13, Lisi wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 March 2011 12:36:52 Heddle Weaver wrote:
> > On 15 March 2011 18:52, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > On Lu, 14 mar 11, 21:11:47, Rob Owens wrote:
> > > > I've seen posts like this on Freecycle, and they're almost always
> spam
> > > > or malware.
Hi,
Gregory Seidman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:08:20AM +1000, Heddle Weaver wrote:
With reference to some of the posts I have seen here lately, this looks
interesting: *http://tinyurl.com/4syb4j9
*Regards,*
I usually add preview to the link as follows:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/4syb4
On Tuesday 15 March 2011 12:36:52 Heddle Weaver wrote:
> On 15 March 2011 18:52, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Lu, 14 mar 11, 21:11:47, Rob Owens wrote:
> > > I've seen posts like this on Freecycle, and they're almost always spam
> > > or malware. I haven't looked at this link, and I suggest you d
On 15 March 2011 23:40, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 03:11, Rob Owens wrote:
> > I've seen posts like this on Freecycle, and they're almost always spam
> > or malware. I haven't looked at this link, and I suggest you don't
> > either.
> >
>
> The problem here is the use of the r
On 15 March 2011 18:52, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 14 mar 11, 21:11:47, Rob Owens wrote:
> > I've seen posts like this on Freecycle, and they're almost always spam
> > or malware. I haven't looked at this link, and I suggest you don't
> > either.
>
> > > --
> > >
> > > Religion is regarded b
On Lu, 14 mar 11, 21:11:47, Rob Owens wrote:
> I've seen posts like this on Freecycle, and they're almost always spam
> or malware. I haven't looked at this link, and I suggest you don't
> either.
> > --
> >
> > Religion is regarded by the common people as true,
> > by the wise as false,
> > an
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 09:11:47PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
> I've seen posts like this on Freecycle, and they're almost always spam or
> malware. I haven't looked at this link, and I suggest you don't either.
That's quite an overreaction. The URL redirects to
http://planet.gnu.org/gnutelephony/?p
I've seen posts like this on Freecycle, and they're almost always spam
or malware. I haven't looked at this link, and I suggest you don't
either.
-Rob
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:08:20AM +1000, Heddle Weaver wrote:
> With reference to some of the posts I have seen here lately, this looks
> intere
Alvin Oga wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Nathan E Norman wrote:
Also, see http://incanus.net/~nnorman/sound/spam.au
and the rest of the spam sounds
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail/spam.sounds/
mpeg samples for testing your sound/video/ra players
http://www.Linux-Video.net/Samples
c ya
alvi
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Also, see http://incanus.net/~nnorman/sound/spam.au
and the rest of the spam sounds
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail/spam.sounds/
mpeg samples for testing your sound/video/ra players
http://www.Linux-Video.net/Samples
c ya
alvin
--
To UNS
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:48:29PM -0700, al davis wrote:
> A Spammer has the list.
>
> It took only one posting to this list to get spammed.
>
> Here's where it came from:
No, that's a random IP address followed by non-evidence. How do we
know it really came from there?
> > 4.40.163.14
> Serv
A Spammer has the list.
It took only one posting to this list to get spammed.
Here's where it came from:
> 4.40.163.14
Server: 63.228.184.2
Address:63.228.184.2#53
Non-authoritative answer:
14.163.40.4.in-addr.arpaname =
lsanca2-ar32-4-40-163-014.lsanca2.dsl-verizon.net
22 matches
Mail list logo
