In-Reply-To: <7f9ebbad-9966-ab81-ca75-8b6fb5154...@disroot.org>
>What is the best way to edit the above anything from the 0ad reference
>and below, or should I comment these out and once buster is out add in
>the correct lines from the various source websites (e.g for 0ad the
>website will have t
Hi
When updating from Stretch to Buster I know that I need to change
references in the sources.list file
Mine is below
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 9.5.0 _Stretch_ - Official amd64 DVD
Binary-1 20180714-10:25]/ stretch contrib main non-free
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 9.5.0 _Stretch_
Hi,
looks like the culprit is a /etc/cron.daily/do-agent cron-job which
executes the /opt/digitalocean/do-agent/scripts/update.sh script which
includes following if statement:
if command -v apt-get 2&>/dev/null; then
apt-get -qq update -o
Dir::Etc::sourcelist="sources.list
> I did some further debugging and it is the
> /usr/lib/apt/apt.systemd.daily script executed by apt-daily systemd
> service unit which updates the package index from the sources:
I configured cron with one minute interval to log the output of "apt
policy" with a timestamp into a log file in order
> Looks like the "apt update" or equivalent ran by unattended-upgrades
> ignored the /etc/apt/sources.list file and used only
> /etc/apt/sources.list.d/digitalocean-agent.list as a source for
> repositories.
> What might cause this behavior?
I did some further debugging a
of "apt policy" and for example, the iceweasel was
again upgradable to 60.7.0esr-1~deb9u1:
$ sudo apt policy iceweasel
iceweasel:
Installed: 52.9.0esr-1~deb9u1
Candidate: 60.7.0esr-1~deb9u1
/* output removed for brevity */
$
Looks like the "apt update" or equivalent ran
Thanks, Bob. I think I would go for the /*http.debian.net */after
reading about it from your supplied link. And for the record, */ or **/
was unintentional and wasn't on my sources.list .
Muntasim-Ul-Haque
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/14 20:47, Bob Proulx wrote:
> What is up with the */ and /**/ stuff?
The HTML version has it bold and italic. I suspect it's icedove trying
to be clever, and use 'formatting' in a 'plain text' format ...
Richard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
curity.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main/*"
What is up with the */ and /**/ stuff? Is that really in your file?
Or did you put them there for some purpose? The comment syntax for
the sources.list file is the '#' character not C style comments. And
that first line with "*/"
Hi,
I use two repositories for Debian Wheezy for the same purpose. One of
them is "HTTP" and another one is "FTP". My two alternatives
sources.list are as follows:
"*/deb http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy main/**/
/**/deb-src http://http.debian.net/debian wheezy main/**/
/**/
/**/deb http://
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 12:51:00PM -0500, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to
say:
> Hello,
>Thanks for your reply. I've included my sources.list file below. I am
> getting this error with the file, any suggestions on what to do with it?
> I've run the apt-get
Dave wrote the following on 12.12.2007 18:51
> deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib
> non-free
deprecated since sarge (oldstable) iirc
--
Thilo
key: 0x4A411E09
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Hello,
Thanks for your reply. I've included my sources.list file below. I am
getting this error with the file, any suggestions on what to do with it?
I've run the apt-get update many times each with the same msg.
Check me on this, comment out the stable lines and uncomment t
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 05:05:34AM -0500, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to
say:
>I'm a newbie to Debian Etch but not new to Linux in general.
>I was reading the Debian Reference doc section 5.2 going to upgrade from
> i believe the terms are Etch Stable to testing. I did a
> cp -f so
rom memory that's contrib,
non-free, stable, security, there's probably more.
How can i regenerate my sources.list file and then proceed with my
upgrade to testing?
Thanks.
Dave.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:05:56PM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Andrei Popescu:
> > On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:12:55PM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> >> Andrei Popescu:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 09:46:50AM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> >>>
> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ etch mai
Andrei Popescu:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:12:55PM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
>> Andrei Popescu:
>>> On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 09:46:50AM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
>>>
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ etch main contrib non-free
>>>
>>> AFAIK ftp.debian.org is kept only for legacy re
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:12:55PM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Andrei Popescu:
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 09:46:50AM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> >
> >> If you wanted to install pure Debian stable, this is most probably not
> >> what you want. The installer should have asked you about that an
Andrei Popescu:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 09:46:50AM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
>
>> If you wanted to install pure Debian stable, this is most probably not
>> what you want. The installer should have asked you about that anyway.
>> But well, here's what I guess is what you want/need:
>>
>> deb
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 09:46:50AM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> If you wanted to install pure Debian stable, this is most probably not
> what you want. The installer should have asked you about that anyway.
> But well, here's what I guess is what you want/need:
>
> deb http://ftp.debian.org/deb
$foo but it resulted in error message $bar.
> I copy the example file in my /etc/apt/sources.list file
> http://wiki.debian.org/sources%2elist_example?highlight=%28sources.list%29
If you wanted to install pure Debian stable, this is most probably not
what you want. The installer sh
Hello,
I tried to install GUI after installing my ISO CD.But I think problem in file
/etc/apt/sources.list .
I copy the example file in my /etc/apt/sources.list file
http://wiki.debian.org/sources%2elist_example?highlight=%28sources.list%29
After that I run apt-get update but when I run
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 12:01:45AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> Dear Debianists,
>
> Here is my apt sources.list file;
>
> localhost:/etc/apt# more sources.list
less is better than more.
> #
> # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Etch_ - Official Snapshot amd64
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 12:01:45AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> Dear Debianists,
>
> Here is my apt sources.list file;
>
> localhost:/etc/apt# more sources.list
> #
> # deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Etch_ - Official Snapshot amd64
> Binary-1 (20061110)]/ e
Michael Fothergill wrote:
Dear Debianists,
Here is my apt sources.list file;
[...]
I want to add a line to it to get it to get software updates for Etch
from the web i.e. packages not security updates.
[...]
It looks like you have installed a snapshot of Etch from CDROM, but you
Dear Debianists,
Here is my apt sources.list file;
localhost:/etc/apt# more sources.list
#
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Etch_ - Official Snapshot amd64
Binary-1 (20061110)]/ etch contrib main
deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Etch_ - Official Snapshot amd64
Binary-3 (20061110
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005, Dale wrote:
> Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
>
> >My sources.list file is listed in its entirety below.
> >
> >On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>My version of debian 3.1 was downloaded via the net, and the o
Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
My sources.list file is listed in its entirety below.
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
My version of debian 3.1 was downloaded via the net, and the original
files, which contained the info for the sources.list file, have been lost.
When I try to
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 17:39, Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
> My sources.list file is listed in its entirety below.
>
> On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
> > My version of debian 3.1 was downloaded via the net, and the original
> > files, which contained the info for the so
My sources.list file is listed in its entirety below.
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
> My version of debian 3.1 was downloaded via the net, and the original
> files, which contained the info for the sources.list file, have been lost.
> When I try to install package pkg with
Subject: sources.list file
Date: Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:40:04PM +0200
In reply to:Goeman Stefan
Quoting Goeman Stefan([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hello,
>
> Can somebody tell me what is wrong with the following entries in
> my sources.list file
>
> deb http://
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 07:13:39PM -0500, will trillich wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:40:04PM +0200, Goeman Stefan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Can somebody tell me what is wrong with the following entries in
> > my sources.list file
> >
> > deb http:
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:40:04PM +0200, Goeman Stefan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can somebody tell me what is wrong with the following entries in
> my sources.list file
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
> deb http://non-us.debian.org sta
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:40:04PM +0200, Goeman Stefan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can somebody tell me what is wrong with the following entries in
> my sources.list file
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
Looks ok - and works for me.
Hello,
Can somebody tell me what is wrong with the following entries in
my sources.list file
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org stable non-US
deb http://security.debian.org/stable/updates main contrib non-free
I get the following
35 matches
Mail list logo
