Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will exim support different alias files for different domains? I've
> got the hideous smail method for doing that installed -- duplicating
> the configuration files in another directory and using dodgy
> transports. This is an important requirement he
On Wed, Mar 25, 1998 at 01:17:25PM +0100, Soenke Lange wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 1998 at 01:51:20PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > I just upgraded to smail 3.2.0.101-3, something I've been dreading.
> > With good reason; even though I haven't enabled any anti-SPAM
> > features it says nobody is al
On Wed, Mar 25, 1998 at 01:51:20PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> I just upgraded to smail 3.2.0.101-3, something I've been dreading.
> With good reason; even though I haven't enabled any anti-SPAM
> features it says nobody is allowed to send it mail.
>
> Can someone please help me urgently :-)
>
On Tue, 24 Mar 1998, George Bonser wrote:
>
>
>
> Hamish,
>
> Forget smail unless you are doing UUCP. Go to exim. I was a long-time user
> and supporter of smail but have given up on it except on this lone system.
> The upstream maintainer has gone mad. If you need smail for UUCP, copy
> your
On Tue, Mar 24, 1998 at 01:11:39PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
> Forget smail unless you are doing UUCP. Go to exim. I was a long-time user
> and supporter of smail but have given up on it except on this lone system.
> The upstream maintainer has gone mad. If you need smail for UUCP, copy
> your s
I just upgraded to smail 3.2.0.101-3, something I've been dreading.
With good reason; even though I haven't enabled any anti-SPAM
features it says nobody is allowed to send it mail.
Can someone please help me urgently :-)
I have disabled my smail for now -- please reply
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as in
6 matches
Mail list logo
