Kleene, Steven (kleenesj) wrote:
> I've suspected as much, since other online videos play just fine. Cisco
> does say that Debian 8 or later is supported (and I have 9) with Firefox
> 48 or later (I have 68).
I would look at DRI and Firefox or as suggested above at the compression or
all of them
orted (and I have 9) with Firefox 48 or
later (I have 68).
Thanks.
From: Stefan Monnier
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 5:11 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: problem with slow network transmission
> What I have been trying a lot is Webex teleconferencing for my j
> What I have been trying a lot is Webex teleconferencing for my job. Those
> all work great, including voice and slideshows, but seem to crash miserably
> (including a loss of sound) if even a single attendant puts up live webcam
> video. Very large conferences that disallow that work fine. We'
Kleene, Steven (kleenesj) wrote:
> The disk is a WD5001AALS-00L3B2 from 2009, described as SATA 3Gbps. I
> guess that is pretty slow. We've definitely tried some best-case
> situations, where no one else is running any CPU hogs.
>
Always copy to /dev/null to ignore such things
But for video co
speedtest.net). Tomorrow I'll have my first Webex conference since I added
the 1Gbps NIC and maxed out memory. We'll see what happens.
From: deloptes
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 1:16 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: problem w
Kleene, Steven (kleenesj) wrote:
> What I have been trying a lot is Webex teleconferencing for my job. Those
> all work great, including voice and slideshows, but seem to crash
> miserably (including a loss of sound) if even a single attendant puts up
> live webcam video. Very large conferences
__
From: Andrei POPESCU
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 1:51 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: problem with slow network transmission
On Lu, 25 mai 20, 17:02:58, Kleene, Steven (kleenesj) wrote:
> My network transmission rate seems much slower than it should be. My deskto
On Lu, 25 mai 20, 17:02:58, Kleene, Steven (kleenesj) wrote:
> My network transmission rate seems much slower than it should be. My desktop
> runs Stretch (v9, oldstable) on a Pentium 4 (3 GHz) with 4GB of RAM (the
> maximum) and a 1Gbps network interface card (NIC). We pay for fiber optic
> serv
My network transmission rate seems much slower than it should be. My desktop
runs Stretch (v9, oldstable) on a Pentium 4 (3 GHz) with 4GB of RAM (the
maximum) and a 1Gbps network interface card (NIC). We pay for fiber optic
service at 500Mbps. The specifications for my router (ZyXEL VMG4381-B10A
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Proulx [mailto:b...@proulx.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 8:27 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Slow network performance with KVM
>
> > > You might also want to try the backported newer versio
Katynski, Bogdan wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > On Squeeze you would want to use a backported 3.2 kernel. It would be
> > worthwhile to try it if you are suffering from this performance
> > problem. Here are instructions:
>
> I installed the backported 3.2.0 kernel and forced vhost-net module lo
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Proulx [mailto:b...@proulx.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 8:15 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Slow network performance with KVM
>
> I forgot that this module is only available in later kernels! Sorry.
&g
Katynski, Bogdan wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > What is the output:
> >
> > $ lsmod | grep vhost_net
>
> I don't have the module loaded and what's worse - I don't have this module :(
>
> root@vmhost:~# modprobe vhost-net
> FATAL: Module vhost_net not found.
> ...
> I don't have these options
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Proulx [mailto:b...@proulx.com]
> Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 5:54 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Slow network performance with KVM
>
> Katynski, Bogdan wrote:
>
> > I noticed a rather poor n
Katynski, Bogdan wrote:
> I noticed a rather poor network guest-guest performance.
Have you loaded the vhost-net kernel module? It is a huge lever for
network performance.
What is the output:
$ lsmod | grep vhost_net
Here are a couple of references:
http://www.linux-kvm.com/content/how-m
On Jul 4, 2012, at 3:09 PM, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
You mean you're still using ipv4 with no ipv6 support from the OS
at all?
I am using an up-to-date install of Squeeze. There were several
network
related updates when IPv6 was supposed to be activated. So I presume
thi
On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 15:09:25 -0700, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>
>> You mean you're still using ipv4 with no ipv6 support from the OS at
>> all?
>
> I am using an up-to-date install of Squeeze. There were several network
>
> related updates when IPv6 was supposed to be activated.
Camaleón wrote:
> You mean you're still using ipv4 with no ipv6 support from the OS at all?
I am using an up-to-date install of Squeeze. There were several network
related updates when IPv6 was supposed to be activated. So I presume
this was an activation for Debian. Since then, certain wire
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 16:10:46 -0700, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> Since the "official" switch to IPv6 I've been having serious problems
> with certain wireless APs. Some are unchanged, but others are very, very
> slw for no detectable reason. Yet, the same APs are just as easily
> accessible as alwa
Since the "official" switch to IPv6 I've been having serious problems with
certain wireless APs. Some are unchanged, but others are very, very slw for
no detectable reason. Yet, the same APs are just as easily accessible as always
with a Windows machine. Could there be a problem caused by no
Thanks for the links. I followed the first one when I set these up
initially. I never got virt-install to work right. I create the
xml file and the disk image manually. I then just use virsh for
define, start and stop. My problem is the network performance is
the sa
Robert, following
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtualization-with-kvm-on-a-debian-squeeze-server
i reach to the conclusion that using kvm network config is
"troublesome".
I ended using "--network=bridge:br0 " on startup the vm, with qemu .
Anyway, from another squeeze
I have tried a KVM setup 2 different ways. The first was using a
straight bridge without using tap at all. The WinXP VM is using the
latest known version of the virtio drivers. The bridge is on a
gigabit nic.
The second setup was using a bridge containing a tap
er to me..
>
> What driver/version? "ethtool -i peth0" should tell that.
>
Also please paste offloading settings from dom0:
"ethtool -k peth0"
Thanks!
-- Pasi
>
> > cheers!
> > b
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:19 PM, virtualroot wrote:
-K eth0 tx off
>
>
> I also had to disable this in my dom0 for dhcp to work...
>
What physical NIC do you have? Sounds like a bug in the driver to me..
What driver/version? "ethtool -i peth0" should tell that.
-- Pasi
> cheers!
> b
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2
dd this to your /etc/network/interfaces, too..
>
> post-up ethtool -K eth0 tx off
>
>
> I also had to disable this in my dom0 for dhcp to work...
>
> cheers!
> b
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:19 PM, virtualroot wrote:
>> I'm getting a slow network spe
, 2009 at 2:19 PM, virtualroot wrote:
> I'm getting a slow network speed (download/upload) domU and dom0
> limits in 10kbps/20kbps.
> Booting a kernel without Xen, this doesnt happens
>
> /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp
> (network-script network-bridge)
> (vif-script vif-b
I'm getting a slow network speed (download/upload) domU and dom0
limits in 10kbps/20kbps.
Booting a kernel without Xen, this doesnt happens
/etc/xen/xend-config.sxp
(network-script network-bridge)
(vif-script vif-bridge)
(dom0-min-mem 196)
(dom0-cpus 0)
cat /etc/xen/XXX.cfg
kernel = &
On 6/26/08, Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So let's start with a wild guess. Run the following command as
> root:
>
>echo 'blacklist ipv6' >/etc/modprobe.d/no-ipv6
Thanks, that made a significant difference. :)
I just realized my wireless router has a bunch of ethernet ports on
th
On Thu June 26 2008 16:07:11 Vikki Roemer wrote:
> I'm running Debian Lenny, kernel 2.6.22-3-686 with a mixed
> wired/wireless network. The debian box is wired, the windows laptops
> are wireless. My network card is
> 02:02.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
> RTL-8139/8139C/8
I'm running Debian Lenny, kernel 2.6.22-3-686 with a mixed
wired/wireless network. The debian box is wired, the windows laptops
are wireless. My network card is
02:02.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10). The modem/router connects to the
wireless
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 10:38 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Slow Network Connection
Have you tried to boot with the noapic option with all of your OS to see
differences ?
Eric Estes a écrit :
> Something I found interesting...PCLinuxOS out of the ones listed belo
37 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Slow Network Connection
I can suggest you, if you have 2 PC and you use IPv4, to try netio
http://freshmeat.net/projects/netio/
You need to compile this old program. But i used to test connection
speed between my machines and it worked pretty
steoi libata
NMI: 0 0
LOC: 56035 56045
ERR: 1
MIS: 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
-Original Message-
From: Bonnel Christophe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 5:37 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Slow Network Connection
I can suggest you, if you have 2 P
I can suggest you, if you have 2 PC and you use IPv4, to try netio
http://freshmeat.net/projects/netio/
You need to compile this old program. But i used to test connection
speed between my machines and it worked pretty good.
Hope this helps
Christophe
Eric Estes a écrit :
I just purchased
proc/interrupts' that PCLinuxOS is using IO-APIC-level vs Debian's
IO-APIC-fasteoi. Could that be my problem and how can I change it?
-Original Message-
From: Eric Estes
Sent: Thu 9/27/2007 11:34 AM
To: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
Subject: Slow Network Connecti
(0.0 b)
Interrupt:22
localhost:/home/eric#
-Original Message-
From: Neil Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 9/27/2007 11:57 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Slow Network Connection
Do you have some sort of duplex mismatch? Ethtool or mii-tool will
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 11:34:52 -0400, Eric Estes wrote:
> I just purchased a Shuttle XPC SN27P2 barebones system.
> Chipset: North Bridge - Nvidia nForce 570 Ultra
> Onboard NIC: Marvell 88E1116(10/100/1000Mbps) - I also added a Intel
> Dual-Server NIC and disabled the Marvell
>
> I tried instal
I don't believe there was a mismatch when I used ethtool.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 11:57 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Slow Network Connection
Do you have some sort of duplex mismatch? Et
Do you have some sort of duplex mismatch? Ethtool or mii-tool will
report duplex status and Ethernet speed.
--
Neil Watson | Debian Linux
System Administrator| Uptime 12 days
http://watson-wilson.ca
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
I just purchased a Shuttle XPC SN27P2 barebones system.
Chipset: North Bridge - Nvidia nForce 570 Ultra
Onboard NIC: Marvell 88E1116(10/100/1000Mbps) - I also added a Intel
Dual-Server NIC and disabled the Marvell
I tried installing Debian 4.0r0, 4.0r1 and a nightly test build and they
all suffer
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:46:22AM -0400, A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
[snipped ridiculous flamage]
>
> At Ubuntu forums, I found at least 8 different threads around the same
> subject (Slow Ubuntu) spanning about 3 versions of the distro. Did the
> same on Google. All suggestions were pretty much the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I can't seem to find any references to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on any ubuntu.com,
>> including lists.ubuntu.com or or ubuntuforums.org
>>
>
> It is a fake e-mail address.
Another reason for banning you.
Seriously though, your problem is Dapper. If
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 22:18 -0400, Marty wrote:
[...snip...]
If in the future I decide to use a spinoff distribution, it's valuable to know
that I can still get support from Debian users. Of course, this would be
done only after seeking support from uses of the spinoff distr
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 22:18 -0400, Marty wrote:
[...snip...]
>
> If in the future I decide to use a spinoff distribution, it's valuable to know
> that I can still get support from Debian users. Of course, this would be
> done only after seeking support from uses of the spinoff distro, as the OP i
Greg Folkert wrote:
Even though Ian Murdock says so. He is saying it is Debian, because it
is spawned by Debian... it is related, but has diverged significantly
from Debian. It has especially change in the "init" sections of the OS,
which is where YOUR problem exists.
I don't think that's been
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 18:37 -0400, A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 09:22 -0400, A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
> >> Greg Folkert wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 15:31 -0400, A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
> I have searched ubuntu forums to no avail. My network connection has
Joe Hart wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Folkert wrote:
[snip]
Do you honestly think that everyone here is using Etch? or Sarge?
All I see is many struggling to help you on a system that is not Debian.
Agreed. This is the Debian User's mailing list.
I don't real
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 09:22 -0400, A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 15:31 -0400, A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
I have searched ubuntu forums to no avail. My network connection has
slowed down considerably since I installed Ubuntu Dapper (6.06.1 LTS) I
hav
Joe Hart wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 15:31 -0400, A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
I have searched ubuntu forums to no avail. My network connection has
slowed down considerably since I installed Ubuntu Dapper (6.06.1 LT
Top post public apology: I acknowledge my error. I make no excuse. I am sorry.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 05:00:05PM -0400, H.S. wrote:
> Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> >In another thread, a poster who claims to be Ian Murdock said that Ubuntu
> >is
>
> I think you are referring to a post I made regardi
Paul E Condon wrote:
In another thread, a poster who claims to be Ian Murdock said that Ubuntu is
I think you are referring to a post I made regarding his quote in one of
his interviews.
I *never* claimed to be Ian Murdock. What is the world gave you that
impression? What you wrote above i
Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In another thread, a poster who claims to be Ian Murdock said that
> Ubuntu is considered to be Debian. I say Debian is the 'One True
> Way', but that Ubuntu is a 'Lesser Way' that can lead to Debian ;-)
>
H.S. is not claiming to be Ian Murdock, he is j
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:58:04PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Until you at least become current on you workstation, stop asking
> >> questions.
> >>
> >
> > Do you honestly think that everyone here is using Etch? or Sarge?
> >
>
> On a Debian user ma
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
>>
>> Until you at least become current on you workstation, stop asking
>> questions.
>>
>
> Do you honestly think that everyone here is using Etch? or Sarge?
>
On a Debian user mailing list, I expect people to use Debian. Not Ubuntu,
not kanotix, not Xandros Though a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Folkert wrote:
[snip]
>> Do you honestly think that everyone here is using Etch? or Sarge?
>
> All I see is many struggling to help you on a system that is not Debian.
>
Agreed. This is the Debian User's mailing list.
>>> I don't really care
Joe Hart wrote the following on 19.03.2007 07:30:
>>> What is this supposed to mean?
>> Ubuntu 2.6 KDE
>
>> is like a smart way of saying Ubuntu GNU/Linux
>> 2.6 refers to linux kernel and kde is obviously not ubuntu
>
>> although when it was "created" it was a mistake by a newcomer
>> i like
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 09:22 -0400, A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 15:31 -0400, A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
> >> I have searched ubuntu forums to no avail. My network connection has
> >> slowed down considerably since I installed Ubuntu Dapper (6.06.1 LTS) I
> >> have di
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
>> On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 15:31 -0400, A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
>>> I have searched ubuntu forums to no avail. My network connection has
>>> slowed down considerably since I installed Ubuntu Dapper (6.06.1 LTS) I
>>>
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 15:31 -0400, A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
I have searched ubuntu forums to no avail. My network connection has
slowed down considerably since I installed Ubuntu Dapper (6.06.1 LTS) I
have disabled ipv6 in /etc/aliases and Firefox, still slow by about 50%.
My mac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thilo Six wrote:
[snip]
>>> may it be network manager?
>> You mean network mangler. That's what it is to a desktop gateway.
>
> sorry never heard of network mangler.
> what i mean is:
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/feisty/net/network-manager
Network-m
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 15:31 -0400, A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
> I have searched ubuntu forums to no avail. My network connection has
> slowed down considerably since I installed Ubuntu Dapper (6.06.1 LTS) I
> have disabled ipv6 in /etc/aliases and Firefox, still slow by about 50%.
>
> My machine AMDSMP i
Thilo Six wrote:
Thilo Six wrote the following on 18.03.2007 20:43:
hmm wait
may it be network manager?
What when you stop it Ben?
sudo /etc/dbus-1/event.d/26NetworkManagerDispatcher stop
sudo /etc/dbus-1/event.d/25NetworkManager stop
But this would only apply to releases after dapper afai
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 12:20:01PM -0400, A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Joe Hart wrote:
Ben,
I've been following this thread but not commenting since I don't do
gnome.
Do I understand correctly that you boot stright to gnome, start a
download and get
Thilo Six wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote the following on 18.03.2007 20:24:
Ben,
I've been following this thread but not commenting since I don't do
gnome.
Do I understand correctly that you boot stright to gnome, start a
download and get poor network components but if you do a gnome network
Marty wrote:
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
I have an Internet router for sharing cable Internet connection. 3 PCs
plugged into this router, class C network, I think. All with static
IPs 192.168.1.2,3 and 4. Gateway (router) is 192.168.1.1 DNS is my
ISP's 64.71.255.198 I am using 100Mb Ethernet and 10/1
Joe Hart wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
[snip]
I have been using Linux as my main os since Caldera, then
RedHat 5.2 in 1999, I used Mandrake (3 versions) and FC1, FC2, Potato,
Sarge, FC 4/5. I found that this Debian variant (Ubuntu) is the only
version
Thilo Six wrote:
Joe Hart wrote the following on 18.03.2007 21:11:
Thilo Six wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote the following on 18.03.2007 20:24:
Ben,
I've been following this thread but not commenting since I don't do
gnome.
Do I understand correctly that you boot stright to gn
Thilo Six wrote:
Marty wrote the following on 18.03.2007 21:22:
Thilo Six wrote:
what gives you
$ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling
?
It should be 0
It's 1 on my system.
From ip-sysctl.txt:
tcp_window_scaling - BOOLEAN
Enable window scaling as defined in
Joe Hart wrote the following on 18.03.2007 21:11:
> Thilo Six wrote:
>> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote the following on 18.03.2007 20:24:
>
>>> Ben,
>>> I've been following this thread but not commenting since I don't do
>>> gnome.
>>>
>>> Do I understand correctly that you boot stright to gnome, start
Marty wrote the following on 18.03.2007 21:22:
> Thilo Six wrote:
>
>> what gives you
>>
>> $ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling
>>
>> ?
>>
>> It should be 0
>
> It's 1 on my system.
>
> From ip-sysctl.txt:
> tcp_window_scaling - BOOLEAN
>Enable window scaling as defined in RF
Thilo Six wrote:
what gives you
$ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling
?
It should be 0
It's 1 on my system.
From ip-sysctl.txt:
tcp_window_scaling - BOOLEAN
Enable window scaling as defined in RFC1323.
This seems like a good thing. Why do you say it should be 0?
--
To
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thilo Six wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote the following on 18.03.2007 20:24:
>
>> Ben,
>> I've been following this thread but not commenting since I don't do
>> gnome.
>>
>> Do I understand correctly that you boot stright to gnome, start a
>> downl
Thilo Six wrote the following on 18.03.2007 20:43:
> hmm wait
> may it be network manager?
> What when you stop it Ben?
>
> sudo /etc/dbus-1/event.d/26NetworkManagerDispatcher stop
> sudo /etc/dbus-1/event.d/25NetworkManager stop
But this would only apply to releases after dapper afaik.
what
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote the following on 18.03.2007 20:24:
> Ben,
> I've been following this thread but not commenting since I don't do
> gnome.
>
> Do I understand correctly that you boot stright to gnome, start a
> download and get poor network components but if you do a gnome network
> setup
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 12:20:01PM -0400, A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
> Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> >Joe Hart wrote:
Ben,
I've been following this thread but not commenting since I don't do
gnome.
Do I understand correctly that you boot stright to gnome, start a
download and get poor network components bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
[snip]
> I have been using Linux as my main os since Caldera, then
> RedHat 5.2 in 1999, I used Mandrake (3 versions) and FC1, FC2, Potato,
> Sarge, FC 4/5. I found that this Debian variant (Ubuntu) is the only
> version under which
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
I have an Internet router for sharing cable Internet connection. 3 PCs
plugged into this router, class C network, I think. All with static IPs
192.168.1.2,3 and 4. Gateway (router) is 192.168.1.1 DNS is my ISP's
64.71.255.198 I am using 100Mb Ethernet and 10/100Mb router. M
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Joe Hart wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
Marty wrote:
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
I have searched ubuntu forums to no avail. My network connection has
slowed down considerably since I installed Ubuntu Dapper (6.06.1
LTS)
Joe Hart wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
Marty wrote:
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
I have searched ubuntu forums to no avail. My network connection has
slowed down considerably since I installed Ubuntu Dapper (6.06.1 LTS) I
have disabled ipv6 in /etc/aliases an
Joe Hart wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
Marty wrote:
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
I have searched ubuntu forums to no avail. My network connection has
slowed down considerably since I installed Ubuntu Dapper (6.06.1 LTS) I
have disabled ipv6 in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
> Marty wrote:
>> A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
>>> I have searched ubuntu forums to no avail. My network connection has
>>> slowed down considerably since I installed Ubuntu Dapper (6.06.1 LTS) I
>>> have disabled ipv6 in /etc/aliases and Fi
Marty wrote:
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
I have searched ubuntu forums to no avail. My network connection has
slowed down considerably since I installed Ubuntu Dapper (6.06.1 LTS) I
have disabled ipv6 in /etc/aliases and Firefox, still slow by about 50%.
My machine AMDSMP is dual boot w2k/ubuntu 6.06.1
A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
I have searched ubuntu forums to no avail. My network connection has
slowed down considerably since I installed Ubuntu Dapper (6.06.1 LTS) I
have disabled ipv6 in /etc/aliases and Firefox, still slow by about 50%.
My machine AMDSMP is dual boot w2k/ubuntu 6.06.1 LTS (2xAthlon
On Saturday 17 March 2007 20:31, A. Ben Hmeda wrote:
> I have searched ubuntu forums to no avail.
Why don't you ask there ? debian mailing lists have nothing to do with ubuntu
support.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
I have searched ubuntu forums to no avail. My network connection has
slowed down considerably since I installed Ubuntu Dapper (6.06.1 LTS) I
have disabled ipv6 in /etc/aliases and Firefox, still slow by about 50%.
My machine AMDSMP is dual boot w2k/ubuntu 6.06.1 LTS (2xAthlon 2000+ 512
RAM), netw
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
I had a bridge up on that host as i was using UML.
However, I was in the process of moving my UML's to vservers and so i
didn't need the bridge anymore. After i removed the bridge, the
networking was fast again. Don't know why that gave problems with
certain kernels but i
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when connect from an WinXp machine to my sarge server with a 2.6.10
> kernel, connectivity to the server is great.
> However, when i upgrade to a 2.6.11 up to a 2.6.14, performance is
> not great at all.
> With connectivity i mean IMAP & smb. I keep my mail on th
Hi,
when connect from an WinXp machine to my sarge server with a 2.6.10
kernel, connectivity to the server is great.
However, when i upgrade to a 2.6.11 up to a 2.6.14, performance is
not great at all.
With connectivity i mean IMAP & smb. I keep my mail on the server and
check it via imap. I also
On 3470 September 1993, Dave Howorth wrote:
> This problem does not occur with other machines on the network
> (including an identical PC installed with Suse Linux) so I suspect
> some quirk of Debian's network configuration (3.0r1 stable).
What nameservers are your computers asking? Compare "cat
I recently installed Debian on a PC for the first time, and consequently
have some questions. One that I thought it might be appropriate to ask
on this forum concerns network speed.
The PC is on a local network connected to the Internet and connections
generally appear to work properly, but th
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 07:49:03PM +0200, Daniel de los Reyes wrote:
> Hi
>
> some of my linux servers inside a private range IP lan, are giving slow
> responses to clients inside the lan connecting to ftp or ssh.
> Whe had no DNS running.
> It seems to me this is because proftpd and sshd are doin
Hi
some of my linux servers inside a private range IP lan, are giving slow
responses to clients inside the lan connecting to ftp or ssh.
Whe had no DNS running.
It seems to me this is because proftpd and sshd are doing reverse DNS
lookups.
So I supose the way to solve this is to set up a dns serve
> Dan Everton wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Aaron Solochek wrote:
> > > If its not too much of a pain in the ass you might want to try switching
> > > the
> > > oomputers around to see if the problem is in the campus infastructure.
> > > Are you in
> > > the same dorm? Are they switched
Dan Everton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Aaron Solochek wrote:
> > If its not too much of a pain in the ass you might want to try switching the
> > oomputers around to see if the problem is in the campus infastructure. Are
> > you in
> > the same dorm? Are they switched or shared connections
Dan Everton wrote:
> As for what I mean by locally and externally... we both live on campus at
> university and are connected to the residential network. Traffic within
> this network is fine and goes at full speed for my friend. The residential
> network is connected (through a firewall) to th
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Dan Everton wrote:
> On 24 Aug 1999, Jens Ritter wrote:
> > What do you mean by locally and externally? Two cards in different
> > directions?
>
> No interrupts and other cards are not the same. I have an ISA VIBRA16 and
> he has an ISA ESS688, I have an PCI S3 ViRGE, he has a
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Aaron Solochek wrote:
> If its not too much of a pain in the ass you might want to try switching the
> oomputers around to see if the problem is in the campus infastructure. Are
> you in
> the same dorm? Are they switched or shared connections? If you live in
> different
>
On 24 Aug 1999, Jens Ritter wrote:
> Dan Everton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The weirdest part about this is that he has identical network card
> > (RTL-8029, using the ne2k-pci driver), identical kernel (2.2.11), identical
> > Debian install (potato as of yesterday) and identical config (ex
Dan Everton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The weirdest part about this is that he has identical network card
> (RTL-8029, using the ne2k-pci driver), identical kernel (2.2.11), identical
> Debian install (potato as of yesterday) and identical config (except for the
> IP address of course :). I hav
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
