On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 02:53:51AM +0900, Akira Kitada wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 10:08:12AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > You did not specify what kernel but I had to include a kernel
> > module to get proper DMA working.
> it's a problem of lack of proper module, don't you?
> if so,
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:16:28PM +0100, Jan Minar wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 01:01:37AM +0900, Akira Kitada wrote:
> > Partition check:
> > hda:<4>hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x61
> > hda: error waiting for DMA
> > hda: dma timeout retry: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete Data
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 10:08:12AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Akira Kitada wrote:
> >Hi all.
> >
> > a few days ago, I had 82.3GB disk installed on my box
> >as primary slave.
> >after that, I turned it on and reading messages of kernel,
> >and found messages that means 'hdb' recognized smoo
Akira Kitada wrote:
Hi all.
a few days ago, I had 82.3GB disk installed on my box
as primary slave.
after that, I turned it on and reading messages of kernel,
and found messages that means 'hdb' recognized smoothly.
that's good.
badly, I found some error messages too,
and noticed booting is ver
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 01:01:37AM +0900, Akira Kitada wrote:
> Partition check:
> hda:<4>hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x61
> hda: error waiting for DMA
> hda: dma timeout retry: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
>
> blk: queue c04102a0, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0x
Hi all.
a few days ago, I had 82.3GB disk installed on my box
as primary slave.
after that, I turned it on and reading messages of kernel,
and found messages that means 'hdb' recognized smoothly.
that's good.
badly, I found some error messages too,
and noticed booting is very slower than before
6 matches
Mail list logo
