> > Wow, you're right. I think that the new version of the slang library fixed
> > this.
>
> Sorry, I said new version of slrn, but I meant new versoin of slang.
> Anyway, I didn't want to bother checking.
>
> > Joost, are you running slang0.99.34?
>
> Yes.
>
Thanks to both Joost and Joey!
I'
>
> > But for some reason, slrn now doesn't come up with that message
> > any more (maybe new version of slrn).
>
> It doesn't?
>
> Wow, you're right. I think that the new version of the slang library fixed
> this.
Sorry, I said new version of slrn, but I meant new versoin of slang.
Anyway, I
> But for some reason, slrn now doesn't come up with that message
> any more (maybe new version of slrn).
It doesn't?
Wow, you're right. I think that the new version of the slang library fixed
this. Joost, are you running slang0.99.34?
--
#!/usr/bin/perl -i=-/*/~%*~%/~~%/~~~-/*/_/=~~~-/~~
> always:
> "terminal not powerful enough for slang". Never saw that before. Is it a
> matter of updating the Slang lib? They work fine on a tty, xjed works
> fine as well. Any clue?
>From slrn's README.debian:
If you want to run slrn in an xterm, slrn may say that your display
"isn't powerfull e
>
> I have encountered the following problem since moving to Debian (1.2),
> and I must admit I cannot find the solution. It appears
> that some binaries compiled with slang (jed and most in any event) will
> not load in an xterm
> (nor for that matter in an rxvt, itself an slang binary!): the rep
I have encountered the following problem since moving to Debian (1.2),
and I must admit I cannot find the solution. It appears
that some binaries compiled with slang (jed and most in any event) will
not load in an xterm
(nor for that matter in an rxvt, itself an slang binary!): the reply is
always:
6 matches
Mail list logo
