Re: run levels 1 and S

2004-12-15 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Are there any differences between the run-levels 1 and S? I know >that S10single is not executed for S, but init spawns sulogin >directly. Any functional differences? Runlevel S doesn't have sta

Re: run levels 1 and S

2004-12-15 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Thomas Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.15.1809 +0100]: > Other than what you have said above, no. So runlevel 1 is really just single user mode because that's the UNIX standard and it would be confusing to have runlevel=1 be the default multiuser system? -- Please do not send copie

Re: run levels 1 and S

2004-12-15 Thread Thomas Adam
--- martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any differences between the run-levels 1 and S? I know > that S10single is not executed for S, but init spawns sulogin > directly. Any functional differences? Other than what you have said above, no. -- Thomas Adam =

run levels 1 and S

2004-12-15 Thread martin f krafft
Are there any differences between the run-levels 1 and S? I know that S10single is not executed for S, but init spawns sulogin directly. Any functional differences? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EM