Re: rtl8139 vs. 8139 too

2001-12-09 Thread Geoff Beaumont
On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 12:09, Jonathan Matthews wrote: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 05:56:57PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to know which of these drivers works better for people in > > kernel 2.2.x. > > > > Reason: one of them may be enabled as the default driver in the

Re: rtl8139 vs. 8139 too

2001-12-09 Thread Jonathan Matthews
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 05:56:57PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to know which of these drivers works better for people in > kernel 2.2.x. > > Reason: one of them may be enabled as the default driver in the next > woody installation system (boot floppies). Well, on the sam

Re: Re: rtl8139 vs. 8139 too

2001-12-08 Thread Paolo Falcone
On Saturday 08 December 2001 11:56, Eduard Bloch wrote: >Hello, > >I would like to know which of these drivers works better for people >in kernel >2.2.x. > > Reason: one of them may be enabled as the default driver in the > next woody installation system (boot floppies). Both are fine, as it st

Re: rtl8139 vs. 8139 too

2001-12-08 Thread Bob Underwood
On Saturday 08 December 2001 11:56, Eduard Bloch wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to know which of these drivers works better for people in > kernel 2.2.x. > > Reason: one of them may be enabled as the default driver in the next > woody installation system (boot floppies). > > Gruss/Regards, > Edua

rtl8139 vs. 8139 too

2001-12-08 Thread Eduard Bloch
Hello, I would like to know which of these drivers works better for people in kernel 2.2.x. Reason: one of them may be enabled as the default driver in the next woody installation system (boot floppies). Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- Flüssigseifenbenutzer! Fristeneinhalter! Geschenkpapierbügler! Au