> I don't want to go too far forward, because I DO NOT want kde4
> installed, EVER. I run gnome/lxde, and my wife runs kde3.. She is
> already mad because people email her with M$ powerpoint attachments, and
> we hear no sound from them... isn't that what youtube is for? I cannot
> understand why p
On 11/21/2010 09:02 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> I also recommend using volatile.
>
thanks!
>> > Volatile is meant for updates to packages whose usefulness naturally
>> > degrades as time passes, like virus scanners and spam filters.
>> > ...
> Another example of a package in volatile is tzdata. Time z
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Paul Cartwright wrote:
> >I have volatile commented out in my sources.list.. should I be using it?
>
> I recommend it, but there aren't that many packages in it anyway so you are
> likely not missing anything.
I also recommend using volatile.
> Volatile is meant
Dne, 21. 11. 2010 13:35:21 je Paul Cartwright napisal(a):
already mad because people email her with M$ powerpoint attachments,
and
we hear no sound from them... isn't that what youtube is for? I cannot
understand why people will send 9Mb powerpoint attachments of a
youtube
video, instead of
On 11/20/2010 06:34 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> I recommend it, but there aren't that many packages in it anyway so you are
> likely not missing anything.
I added it back did an update, and I think it did find 1 or 2 apps to
update.. nothing.. that I could see, that might be a security iss
On 11/20/2010 07:07 PM, Brian wrote:
> Slapper Worm: ". . . . spreads on Linux machines by using a flaw
> discovered in August 2002 in OpenSSL libraries." (www.f-secure.com). And
> the flaw hasn't been fixed?
don't have that one, good info though!
> You'll have to make your own mind up about the v
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 08:08:02 -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I run rkhunter, and today I got this report:
>
> Warning: Application 'gpg', version '1.4.10', is out of date, and
> possibly a security risk.
> Warning: Application 'openssl', version '0.9.8n', is out of date, and
> possibly a securi
On Sat 20 Nov 2010 at 16:50:59 -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> are you saying rkhunter is not worth running?
Chosen at random.
beX2, portacelo and devil rootkits: Distinguished by there being no
evidence for their existence. A doctor telling me to avoid contracting
beX2, portacelo or devil disea
In <4ce83a40.5030...@pcartwright.com>, Paul Cartwright wrote:
>On 11/20/2010 03:59 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> Many people don't consider Debian stable up-to-date even with packages
>> from security.debian.org and volatile.debian.org in use. It is possible
>> that the development / releas
On 11/20/2010 03:46 PM, Brian wrote:
> Well, don't run applications which output spurious warnings as a matter
> of course. Purging rkhunter will do wonders for your blood pressure
> without endangering your system.
are you saying rkhunter is not worth running?
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 08:46:57PM +, Brian wrote:
>
> Well, don't run applications which output spurious warnings as a matter
> of course. Purging rkhunter will do wonders for your blood pressure
> without endangering your system.
>
I agree.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ..
On Sat 20 Nov 2010 at 15:28:30 -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I just don't like getting messages that tell me something is NOT
> uptodate, when I am ALWAYS up to date..
Well, don't run applications which output spurious warnings as a matter
of course. Purging rkhunter will do wonders for your bl
Paul Cartwright [2010.11.20 1528 -0500]:
> On 11/20/2010 03:14 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> >> >Warning: Application 'gpg', version '1.4.10', is out of date, and
> >> >possibly a
> >> >security risk. Warning: Application 'openssl', version '0.9.8n', is out of
> >> >date, and possibly a secu
On 11/20/2010 03:59 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> File a bug against rkhunter, then.
that is a thought..
>> >I just don't like getting messages that tell me something is NOT
>> >uptodate, when I am ALWAYS up to date..
> Many people don't consider Debian stable up-to-date even with packages fr
In <4ce82f6e.3030...@pcartwright.com>, Paul Cartwright wrote:
>On 11/20/2010 03:14 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>>> >Warning: Application 'gpg', version '1.4.10', is out of date, and
>>> >possibly a security risk. Warning: Application 'openssl', version
>>> >'0.9.8n', is out of date, and possi
On 11/20/2010 03:14 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> >Warning: Application 'gpg', version '1.4.10', is out of date, and possibly a
>> >security risk. Warning: Application 'openssl', version '0.9.8n', is out of
>> >date, and possibly a security risk. Warning: Application 'sshd', version
>> >'5.5
In <4ce7c832.7010...@pcartwright.com>, Paul Cartwright wrote:
>I run rkhunter, and today I got this report:
>
>Warning: Application 'gpg', version '1.4.10', is out of date, and possibly a
>security risk. Warning: Application 'openssl', version '0.9.8n', is out of
>date, and possibly a security risk
I run rkhunter, and today I got this report:
Warning: Application 'gpg', version '1.4.10', is out of date, and possibly a
security risk.
Warning: Application 'openssl', version '0.9.8n', is out of date, and possibly
a security risk.
Warning: Application 'sshd', version '5.5p1', is out of date, a
On 2008-08-26 15:07, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> Does this mean anything?
>
> Warning: The file properties have changed:
> File: /bin/login
> Current hash: 9092a50dbbf0b16b095a1ee22e9bfb2a9e0f9a21
> Stored hash : b333555dccebeca07909fdc9c53160f5e399d4f6
> Current i
Does this mean anything?
Warning: The file properties have changed:
File: /bin/login
Current hash: 9092a50dbbf0b16b095a1ee22e9bfb2a9e0f9a21
Stored hash : b333555dccebeca07909fdc9c53160f5e399d4f6
Current inode: 2068498Stored inode: 2071401
Current si
20 matches
Mail list logo
