On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:56, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:18, Dotan Cohen wrote:
sidenote:
this year has had probably the worst participation since I've started
this poll in 2005 :-(
>>>
>>> I noticed that as well. Kinda sad. Any thoughts as to why?
>>>
>>> Me neither. I didn't participate because there wasn't a web based
>>> app. It's not like there isn't any FOSS web based poll software
>>> available ...
>>
>> Out of interest, why? This seems to me like odd grounds on which to not
>> participate.
>
> I don't post/read this list with e-mail softw
>> I, for one, probably wouldn't have participated if I had to open a web
>> browser. I certainly wouldn't have participated if I had to register.
>
> It would be useful if you can choose both methods (mail and doodle
> like system)
>
They will both be supported, and no, there will be no need to
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:21:00 +, Avi Greenbury in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
> S. Fishpaste wrote:
>> Me neither. I didn't participate because there wasn't a web based
>> app. It's not like there isn't any FOSS web based poll software
>> available ...
>
> Out of interest, why? This seems to
> Hi, are there possibilies to do this survey using a internet-based
> user interface. I think, this might give more up-to-date information.
>
Next year's survey will almost certainly be web-based. I am
collaborating with Tshepang on this. In the meantime, to keep one's
answers off the archived we
S. Fishpaste wrote:
> Me neither. I didn't participate because there wasn't a web based
> app. It's not like there isn't any FOSS web based poll software
> available ...
Out of interest, why? This seems to me like odd grounds on which to not
participate.
--
Avi Greenbury
http://aviswebsite.co.uk
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:15:54 +0100, Javier Barroso in gmane.linux.debian.user
wrote:
> I think that a webapp can do the hard work of recollect all the data
> from people that doesn't dislike webapps and then a poor human can
> translate from email replies to the database and get stats from both.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
> In , Gabor Urban
> wrote:
>>Hi, are there possibilies to do this survey using a internet-based
>>user interface.
>
> It has used email traveling over the Internet since it's inception. That's an
> Internet-based user interface in my
In , Gabor Urban
wrote:
>Hi, are there possibilies to do this survey using a internet-based
>user interface.
It has used email traveling over the Internet since it's inception. That's an
Internet-based user interface in my book.
Is it possible your mean "web-based"? That's still a bad term, s
Hi, are there possibilies to do this survey using a internet-based
user interface. I think, this might give more up-to-date information.
--
Linux: Choice of a GNU Generation
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
> Isn't it a good thing? I think it is amazingly good. Take a look at all
> those questions asked in the Ubuntu forum, >90% are tasteless. What's
> worse, (have you flipped down several index pages?), the questions on the
> 4th or 5th pages are just asked hours ago! I think the "huge success" of
>
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:51:31 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>>> my .02 is that the list doesn't seem to have quite the breadth of
>>> traffic it has had before. But that's a cursory observation at best.
>>
>> This seem to back that up.
>>
>> http://lists.debian.org/stats/debian-user.png
>
> T
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:01:53 -0500
Tim Tebbit wrote:
> Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >
> > My guess would be the popularity of Ubuntu. Much of the pie went
> > there. As Ubuntu is Debian-derived, how about doing the poll there as
> > well?
> >
>
> Out of curiosity I extracted unique email address from
Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
> My guess would be the popularity of Ubuntu. Much of the pie went
> there. As Ubuntu is Debian-derived, how about doing the poll there as
> well?
>
Out of curiosity I extracted unique email address from ubuntu-users.mbox
available from their archive site. The archive starts
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:01:20 +0200
Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >> Would you like me to do it? I am rather active on the Ubuntu and
> >> Kubuntu lists. I have no problem taking responsibility for those
> >> lists every year, and you keep up the good work with Debian. What
> >> do you say?
> >
> > magnifi
>> Would you like me to do it? I am rather active on the Ubuntu and
>> Kubuntu lists. I have no problem taking responsibility for those lists
>> every year, and you keep up the good work with Debian. What do you
>> say?
>
> magnificent! when u going to start it? I'm going to re-subscribe right
> no
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:25, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> I actually once did, but am sure I'll be swamped if I try now - Ubuntu
>> is massive! It would be nice though to compare the response
>> (favourites) from both camps. I'll limit myself to Debian for now;
>> maybe next year :-(
>>
>
> Would you li
> I actually once did, but am sure I'll be swamped if I try now - Ubuntu
> is massive! It would be nice though to compare the response
> (favourites) from both camps. I'll limit myself to Debian for now;
> maybe next year :-(
>
Would you like me to do it? I am rather active on the Ubuntu and
Kubun
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:18, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>>> sidenote:
>>> this year has had probably the worst participation since I've started
>>> this poll in 2005 :-(
>>
>> I noticed that as well. Kinda sad. Any thoughts as to why?
>>
>> my .02 is that the list doesn't seem to have quite the breadth o
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 03:31, Tim Tebbit wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
>>
>> I noticed that as well. Kinda sad. Any thoughts as to why?
>>
>> my .02 is that the list doesn't seem to have quite the breadth of
>> traffic it has had before. But that's a cursory observation at best.
>
> This
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 20:31 -0500, Tim Tebbit wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> >
> > I noticed that as well. Kinda sad. Any thoughts as to why?
> >
> > my .02 is that the list doesn't seem to have quite the breadth of
> > traffic it has had before. But that's a cursory observation at b
>> sidenote:
>> this year has had probably the worst participation since I've started
>> this poll in 2005 :-(
>
> I noticed that as well. Kinda sad. Any thoughts as to why?
>
> my .02 is that the list doesn't seem to have quite the breadth of
> traffic it has had before. But that's a cursory obser
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 08:31:47PM -0500, Tim Tebbit wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> >
> > I noticed that as well. Kinda sad. Any thoughts as to why?
> >
> > my .02 is that the list doesn't seem to have quite the breadth of
> > traffic it has had before. But that's a cursory observati
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> I noticed that as well. Kinda sad. Any thoughts as to why?
>
> my .02 is that the list doesn't seem to have quite the breadth of
> traffic it has had before. But that's a cursory observation at best.
This seem to back that up.
http://lists.debian.org/stats/de
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:07:21PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following is the results of a poll that has been running for over a
> week, one which questions readers of debian-user to list their
> favourite FLOSS -> Free (Libre) or Open Source Software.
[...]
>
> sidenote:
> thi
Hi,
Following is the results of a poll that has been running for over a
week, one which questions readers of debian-user to list their
favourite FLOSS -> Free (Libre) or Open Source Software.
There's the usual stars in the form of Firefox/Iceweasel, GIMP,
aptitude, and OpenOffice.org's word proce
26 matches
Mail list logo
