On 2024-12-16, Poon Weng Chee wrote:
>
> Dear Debian,
>
> We have discovered that the public IP address of deb.debian.org, which is u=
> sed to access the Debian repositories, is listed as a threat or malicious I=
> P address on http://brightcloud.com/support/lookup.php.
>
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 5:12 PM Poon Weng Chee wrote:
>
> Dear Debian,
>
> We have discovered that the public IP address of deb.debian.org, which is
> used to access the Debian repositories, is listed as a threat or malicious IP
> address on http://brightcloud.com/
On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 20:12 +, Andy Smith wrote:
> deb.debian.org is hosted by the Fastly CDN as are literally millions of
> other sites, because that is the point of a CDN.
Furthermore, it is not a single IP address, but there is some
geolocation going on, so deb.debian.org resolves to differ
On 17/12/24 03:29, George at Clug wrote:
On Tuesday, 17-12-2024 at 06:08 Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
On Monday 16 December 2024 08:09:08 am Poon Weng Chee wrote:
Dear Debian,
We have discovered that the public IP address of deb.debian.org, which is used
to access the Debian repositories
g, which is
> used to access the Debian repositories, is listed as a threat or malicious IP
> address on http://brightcloud.com/support/lookup.php.
deb.debian.org is hosted by the Fastly CDN as are literally millions of
other sites, because that is the point of a CDN. So:
1. There's n
On Tuesday, 17-12-2024 at 06:08 Roy J. Tellason, Sr. wrote:
> On Monday 16 December 2024 08:09:08 am Poon Weng Chee wrote:
> > Dear Debian,
> >
> > We have discovered that the public IP address of deb.debian.org, which is
> > used to access the Debian repositorie
On Monday 16 December 2024 08:09:08 am Poon Weng Chee wrote:
> Dear Debian,
>
> We have discovered that the public IP address of deb.debian.org, which is
> used to access the Debian repositories, is listed as a threat or malicious IP
> address on http://brightcloud.com/sup
Dear Debian,
We have discovered that the public IP address of deb.debian.org, which is used
to access the Debian repositories, is listed as a threat or malicious IP
address on http://brightcloud.com/support/lookup.php.
Despite attempting to submit this IP address for removal from the threat
pandas-datareader(python package) isn't included in any Debian repositoriy.
Is it not stable or not compatible with current Debian policy ?
Thanks for the detailed inspection. I'll have a closer look into the apt
abilities.
Regards,
Jörg.
On 04/10/2023 15:42, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
$ apt list '~i' | grep -v '/testing'
and
$ apt-show-versions | grep -v '/testing '
show the same packages, correctly, but
$ apt list '~i!~Atesting'
is missing some packages.
It is the reason why I added '?narrow'. Try
apt list '?any-version
Max Nikulin wrote on 04/10/2023 04:22:
On 04/10/2023 01:29, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
Max Nikulin wrote on 03/10/2023 12:11:
apt list '?narrow(~i, !~Astable|~Astable-backports|!~O^Debian$|~o|~c)'
In my experience the only tool that gives correct answers, is
apt-show-versions in the package of
kages should be reported by
apt list '~o'
In my cases '~o' was inapplicable since packages are available from
configured repositories. At certain moment (after reinstalling
libstdc++6 and removing gcc-13-base) my list was
elpa-org/testing,now 9.6.9+dfsg-1 all [installed]
l
On Wed 04 Oct 2023 at 09:22:06 (+0700), Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 04/10/2023 01:29, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> > Max Nikulin wrote on 03/10/2023 12:11:
> > > apt list '?narrow(~i, !~Astable|~Astable-backports|!~O^Debian$|~o|~c)'
> >
> > In my experience the only tool that gives correct answers, is
>
On 04/10/2023 01:29, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
Max Nikulin wrote on 03/10/2023 12:11:
apt list '?narrow(~i, !~Astable|~Astable-backports|!~O^Debian$|~o|~c)'
In my experience the only tool that gives correct answers, is
apt-show-versions in the package of the same name:
$ apt-show-versions |
Max Nikulin wrote on 03/10/2023 12:11:
apt list '?narrow(~i, !~Astable|~Astable-backports|!~O^Debian$|~o|~c)'
In my experience the only tool that gives correct answers, is apt-show-versions
in the package of the same name:
$ apt-show-versions | grep -v '/stable '
Beware, that it works with
Hi,
What is the recommended way to find deb packages installed from
repositories other than stable? My current variant is
apt list '?narrow(~i, !~Astable|~Astable-backports|!~O^Debian$|~o|~c)'
I can not say that I fully understand how apt-patterns(7) work, so I am
afraid that
On 27/7/23 16:10, rudu wrote:
Le 26/07/2023 à 23:16, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 11:15:13PM +0200, rudu wrote:
Thank you David, but I thought that non-free-firmware should be
enough for
the new testing repositories.
Should I had "non-free" to "main c
Le 26/07/2023 à 23:16, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 11:15:13PM +0200, rudu wrote:
Thank you David, but I thought that non-free-firmware should be enough for
the new testing repositories.
Should I had "non-free" to "main contrib non-free-firmware"
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 11:15:13PM +0200, rudu wrote:
> Thank you David, but I thought that non-free-firmware should be enough for
> the new testing repositories.
> Should I had "non-free" to "main contrib non-free-firmware" ?
> Sounds weird to me ... ??
Th
you David, but I thought that non-free-firmware should be enough
for the new testing repositories.
Should I had "non-free" to "main contrib non-free-firmware" ?
Sounds weird to me ... ??
Rudu
On Wed 26 Jul 2023 at 15:39:49 (+0200), rudu wrote:
> Switching from the nouveau driver to some nvidia-driver does not seam
> to be possible on my laptop running Debian Testing/Trixie.
> Now, it can be found right here apparently :
> https://packages.debian.org/trixie/nvidia-driver
> Am I missing s
Hi there,
Switching from the nouveau driver to some nvidia-driver does not seam to
be possible on my laptop running Debian Testing/Trixie.
Now, it can be found right here apparently :
https://packages.debian.org/trixie/nvidia-driver
Am I missing something ?
Some information about my system is f
On 09 May 2023 23:21, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 05:40:18AM +0200, zithro wrote:
In short, zero time taken.
For a comparatively large response. Almost as if that was their goal
(trolling)!
Cheers,
Andy
Well he's using 225 chars, me 424, it's only ~ the double ;)
And
Hello,
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 05:40:18AM +0200, zithro wrote:
> In short, zero time taken.
For a comparatively large response. Almost as if that was their goal
(trolling)!
Cheers,
Andy
--
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
> I'd be interested to hear any (even two word) reviews
On 07 May 2023 12:14, Дмитрий wrote:
the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version, and in
order to get the current version, you need to drag something like Homebrew, it
really pisses you off and pushes you away from using the distribution
Ahah this post ! ^^
For futur
Jeff writes:
> Unstable does not get security updates by the Debian Security Team. If
> you want timely security updates, then you have to look elsewhere.
In practice Unstable almost always gets security updates as quickly or
more quickly than Stable does. Upstream usually only patches their
curr
On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 3:10 PM Brian wrote:
>
> On Sun 07 May 2023 at 14:57:32 -0400, Lee wrote:
>
> > On 5/7/23, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 7:30 AM Дмитрий wrote:
> > >>
> > >> the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version, and
> > >> in order to get
On Mon, 8 May 2023 07:12:12 +0200
Oliver Schoede wrote:
Hello Oliver,
>It was already concluded we're supposed to be talking about Neovim, the
Not really. OP hasn't been back to clarify, but version numbers appear
to support the hypothesis. However, that's not a guarantee of accuracy.
Anothe
On 5/7/23 14:04, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 11:33:04AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 5/7/23 09:20, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
Very nasty, it is.
Cheers
Yoda, is that you? ;O)>
Much smarter than me, Yoda is.
;-)
I've read enough of your posts to know better than
On Sun, 07 May 2023 21:36:32 +0200
Michel Verdier wrote:
>And beside the fact we are on a debian forum, and that debian is much
>better than fedora and arch linux, all this don't answer the main
>problem : there is no package called neodim. If this is this neodim :
>
>https://github.com/zbirenbau
Hello,
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 01:14:57PM +0300, Дмитрий wrote:
> in order to get the current version [of some random software I
> never heard of], you need to drag something like Homebrew, it
> really pisses you off and pushes you away from using the
> distribution
I heard that there is just one
Le 7 mai 2023 Brian a écrit :
>> > You might give Fedora a try. Its release cadence is every 6 months. At
>> > each release, Fedora typically supplies the most current version of a
>> > package.
>> >
>> > You may find Fedora aligns better with your requirements.
>>
>> How about Arch linux?
>>
>>
On 5/7/23, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 7:30 AM Дмитрий wrote:
>>
>> the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version, and
>> in order to get the current version, you need to drag something like
>> Homebrew, it really pisses you off and pushes you away from usi
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 11:33:04AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 5/7/23 09:20, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > Very nasty, it is.
> >
> > Cheers
> Yoda, is that you? ;O)>
Much smarter than me, Yoda is.
;-)
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 7:30 AM Дмитрий wrote:
>
> the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version, and in
> order to get the current version, you need to drag something like Homebrew,
> it really pisses you off and pushes you away from using the distribution
You might give
On 5/7/23 09:20, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 01:14:57PM +0300, Дмитрий wrote:
[...] it really pisses you off [...]
Oh, it does?
Very nasty, it is.
Cheers
Yoda, is that you? ;O)>
Cheers, Gene Heskett.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ba
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 01:14:57PM +0300, Дмитрий wrote:
>
> [...] it really pisses you off [...]
Oh, it does?
Very nasty, it is.
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 07:53:36AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Дмитрий wrote:
> > the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version,
> At packages.debian.org, I put in "neodim" and got:
>
> ---
> You have searched for packages that names contain neodim in all
> suites, all sect
Дмитрий wrote:
>
> the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version, and in
> order to get the current version, you need to drag something like Homebrew,
> it really pisses you off and pushes you away from using the distribution
At packages.debian.org, I put in "neodim" a
the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version, and in
order to get the current version, you need to drag something like Homebrew, it
really pisses you off and pushes you away from using the distribution
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 09:20:12PM +, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 04:50:56PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Russell L. Harris wrote:
> > > Where can I find a list of URLs for Synaptic repositories such as that
> > > displayed by the installer?
&g
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 04:50:56PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
Russell L. Harris wrote:
Where can I find a list of URLs for Synaptic repositories such as that
displayed by the installer?
I need to switch from a local Approx repository to one of the
publically-accessible repositories such as
Russell L. Harris wrote:
> Where can I find a list of URLs for Synaptic repositories such as that
> displayed by the installer?
>
> I need to switch from a local Approx repository to one of the
> publically-accessible repositories such as maintained by debian.org.
Regardless of
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 08:57:16PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 08:47:54PM +, Russell L. Harris wrote:
Where can I find a list of URLs for Synaptic repositories such as that
displayed by the installer?
I need to switch from a local Approx repository to one of the
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 08:47:54PM +, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> Where can I find a list of URLs for Synaptic repositories such as that
> displayed by the installer?
>
> I need to switch from a local Approx repository to one of the
> publically-accessible repositories such a
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 08:47:54PM +, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> Where can I find a list of URLs for Synaptic repositories such as that
> displayed by the installer?
https://www.debian.org/mirror/list
Where can I find a list of URLs for Synaptic repositories such as that
displayed by the installer?
I need to switch from a local Approx repository to one of the
publically-accessible repositories such as maintained by debian.org.
--
He turneth rivers into a wilderness, and the watersprings into
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 10:57:38 -0600
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 11:02:26 -0500
> David Wright wrote:
>
> > As for laptops,
>
> I handle laptops a bit differently (that's Linux for you). My proxy
> statement is in its own file in /etc/apt. When the laptop is home,
> there's a sym
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022, Celejar wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 22:15:36 -0600
Charles Curley wrote:
...
Apt-cacher-ng (hereafter acng) also requires a change in client apt
configurations. Put one line into apt.conf or a one-liner in
apt.conf.d. I use the latter, 02proxy:
Acquire::http::Proxy "http
I've tried many...
apt-cache
debmirror
ftpsync
I prefer debmirror
You can also use aptly but it will be a non original mirror.
On 2022-04-19 12:57, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 11:02:26 -0500
> David Wright wrote:
>
>> As for laptops,
>
> I handle laptops a bit differently (th
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 11:02:26 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> As for laptops,
I handle laptops a bit differently (that's Linux for you). My proxy
statement is in its own file in /etc/apt. When the laptop is home,
there's a symlink in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d. The symlink gets removed or
made by a script N
On Tue 19 Apr 2022 at 07:24:53 (+0200), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 09:08:08PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 22:15:36 -0600
> > Charles Curley wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > Apt-cacher-ng (hereafter acng) also requires a change in client apt
> > > configuratio
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 09:08:08PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 22:15:36 -0600
> Charles Curley wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Apt-cacher-ng (hereafter acng) also requires a change in client apt
> > configurations. Put one line into apt.conf or a one-liner in
> > apt.conf.d. I use the latte
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 21:08:08 -0400
Celejar wrote:
> Yes. I use apt-cacher-ng, but having to manually add a workaround for
> every SSL-only repository I use is getting rather annoying:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/AptCacherNg#HTTPS_repositories
> https://blog.packagecloud.io/using-apt-cacher-ng-wi
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 22:15:36 -0600
Charles Curley wrote:
...
> Apt-cacher-ng (hereafter acng) also requires a change in client apt
> configurations. Put one line into apt.conf or a one-liner in
> apt.conf.d. I use the latter, 02proxy:
>
> Acquire::http::Proxy "http://aptcacherdeb.localdomain:31
Am Fri, 15 Apr 2022 07:03:14 -0400
schrieb Sam :
>That's pretty much it. I want to mirror all my updates to a single server on
>my LAN and have everything on my LAN apt update from it. This seems more
>efficient than having everyone download their own copies.
For mirroring a repository I recommen
at I was able to use approx(8) with non-Debian
> repositories via creative configuration.
acng does support some non-deb repos. For more details, see
/etc/apt-cacher-ng/acng.conf.
I think I'll stay with acng.
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurley.com/blog/
nal features that apt-cacher-ng(8) [3]
seems to improve upon:
1. Each host needed its apt(8) [1] configuration to point at the
approx(8) server.
2. The approx(8) server needed its configuration to point at the remote
repositories.
3. I seem to recall that I was able to use approx(8) with
what it does. I see it launching xz over and over
> again, while aptly keeps me in the loop of how many of those 18000
> packages are left to process.
>
> Although I don't need to worry about wearing any SSDs (since it's
> spinning rust), this is still somewhat suboptimal. S
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 6:10 AM Sam wrote:
> That's pretty much it. I want to mirror all my updates to a single server
> on
> my LAN and have everything on my LAN apt update from it. This seems more
> efficient than having everyone download their own copies.
>
> Google told me to use apt-mirror.
ample, your mirror will be very significantly smaller.
> So, that brings me to: what do
> folks use to mirror repositories?
>
Hope this helps.
With every good wish, as ever,
Andy Cater
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 01:36:43PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 07:03:14AM -0400, Sam wrote:
> > That's pretty much it. I want to mirror all my updates to a single server on
> > my LAN and have everything on my LAN apt update from it. This seems more
> > efficient than h
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 07:03:14AM -0400, Sam wrote:
> That's pretty much it. I want to mirror all my updates to a single server on
> my LAN and have everything on my LAN apt update from it. This seems more
> efficient than having everyone download their own copies.
If all you are looking for is e
ocess.
Although I don't need to worry about wearing any SSDs (since it's spinning
rust), this is still somewhat suboptimal. So, that brings me to: what do
folks use to mirror repositories?
pgpqL38pnY_vQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 05:02:00PM +, mu...@disroot.org wrote:
> Wouldn't it be necessary to update this document then?
>
> "The main archive area forms the Debian distribution.
>
> Packages
> in the other archive areas (contrib, non-free) are not considered to be
> part of the Debian dist
Wouldn't it be necessary to update this document then?
"The main archive area forms the Debian distribution.
Packages
in the other archive areas (contrib, non-free) are not considered to be
part of the Debian distribution, although we support their use and
provide infrastructure for them (such
On Sun 15 Aug 2021 at 22:07:27 (+), Ramon Mulin wrote:
> The DVD-1 image is coming with contrib enabled on the cd-rom,
> security and update lines. This is normal?
AIUI the selection of software on DVD-1 is designed to give as
comprehensive a collection as possible, based partly on popularity,
Hello everybody. The DVD-1 image is coming with contrib enabled on the cd-rom,
security and update lines. This is normal? The netinstall image is just with
main.
P.S.: Sorry for my english.
Ramon Mulin
Professor de História
On 08/02/2021 02:44, John Berden wrote:
> Hello.
> Can you recommend any trusted repositories for installing the latest
> developer packages, including Python?
It depends on how "latest" you need. If you need the genuine Python
development packages, then the Python Developmen
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 04:44:26 +0200
John Berden wrote:
> Hello.
> Can you recommend any trusted repositories for installing the latest
> developer packages, including Python?
> Thanks in advance!
Please be more specific - what exactly are you trying to accomplish? An
example?
Celejar
Hello.
Can you recommend any trusted repositories for installing the latest
developer packages, including Python?
Thanks in advance!
>
> apt(-get) update
> and install
> apt(-get) install virtualbox-6.0
>
> This installed Version 6.0.10 r132072 (Qt5.9.5)
This procedure will automatically make the Oracle key trusted for *all*
configured repositories (notably Debian).
If my reading of sources.list(5
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 02:42:23PM -, bolkar...@elude.in wrote:
hi all,
i would like add a key (synaptic > repositories > software & updates -
authentication) using the terminal/console.
do you know the command that i must do please ?
* i tried :
# gpg --export --armor [key] | a
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:42:23 -
bolkar...@elude.in wrote:
Hello bolkar...@elude.in,
>do you know the command that i must do please ?
apt-key, which requires you to use su(do) privileges.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediatel
hi all,
i would like add a key (synaptic > repositories > software & updates -
authentication) using the terminal/console.
do you know the command that i must do please ?
* i tried :
# gpg --export --armor [key] | apt-key add
it does not work.
thx.
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Le 02/06/2018 à 17:14, Brian a écrit :
> On Sat 02 Jun 2018 at 11:02:31 +, Markos wrote:
>> Now I've just installed Debian 9 (stretch) and I'm looking for a site for
>> repository redirection, but I'm confused.
>>
>> I found the sites:
>>
>> http://httpredir.debian.org/
>>
>> http://deb.debian.
On Sat 02 Jun 2018 at 11:02:31 +, Markos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had placed in sources.list of my old Debian 8 the address:
>
> deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian jessie main contrib non-free
>
> Now I've just installed Debian 9 (stretch) and I'm looking for a site for
> repository redirecti
Hi,
I had placed in sources.list of my old Debian 8 the address:
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian jessie main contrib non-free
Now I've just installed Debian 9 (stretch) and I'm looking for a site
for repository redirection, but I'm confused.
I found the sites:
http://httpredir.debian
thank you very much
David Wright:
> On Sat 11 Feb 2017 at 12:35:00 (+), GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>> Jimmy Johnson:
>>> On 02/10/2017 05:49 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 10 Feb 2017 at 16:00:13 (-0800), Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> Hello,
> Take a look at Synaptic Menu you can select a packa
Joe:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 12:35:00 +
> GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>
>> One thing I have not been able to find in synaptic or elsewhere is a
>> way to keep track of what has been installed and when. If you know
>> where such a log habitates or can be created let me/us know.
>
> Try File -> History.
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 12:35:00 +
GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> Jimmy Johnson:
> > On 02/10/2017 05:49 PM, David Wright wrote:
> >> On Fri 10 Feb 2017 at 16:00:13 (-0800), Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> Take a look at Synaptic Menu you can select a package and then go
> >>> to Package > Forc
On Sat 11 Feb 2017 at 12:35:00 (+), GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> Jimmy Johnson:
> > On 02/10/2017 05:49 PM, David Wright wrote:
> >> On Fri 10 Feb 2017 at 16:00:13 (-0800), Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> Take a look at Synaptic Menu you can select a package and then go to
> >>> Package > Force
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 12:35:00 +
GiaThnYgeia wrote:
(...)
> One thing I have not been able to find in synaptic or elsewhere is a way
> to keep track of what has been installed and when. If you know where
> such a log habitates or can be created let me/us know.
/var/log/apt/history.log mi
Jimmy Johnson:
> On 02/10/2017 05:49 PM, David Wright wrote:
>> On Fri 10 Feb 2017 at 16:00:13 (-0800), Jimmy Johnson wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> Take a look at Synaptic Menu you can select a package and then go to
>>> Package > Force Version, you can only force one package at a time
>>> but, yes you can
On 02/10/2017 05:49 PM, David Wright wrote:
On Fri 10 Feb 2017 at 16:00:13 (-0800), Jimmy Johnson wrote:
On 02/09/2017 04:58 PM, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
In most cases documents simplify that stretch is testing, so I thought
there was no difference, then something I read recently made me think
once
Brian:
> On Fri 10 Feb 2017 at 10:43:00 +, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>
> [We are are talking about some using the testing distribution].
>
>> I did not upgrade this time, just left it where it is as "if it ain't
>> broke don't fix it" wondering why this is. I think the uneasiness comes
>> from the
On Fri 10 Feb 2017 at 16:00:13 (-0800), Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> On 02/09/2017 04:58 PM, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> >In most cases documents simplify that stretch is testing, so I thought
> >there was no difference, then something I read recently made me think
> >once stretch becomes stable I would be bum
On 02/09/2017 04:58 PM, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
Lisi Reisz:
Right, so if you wish to remain on Stretch, which I think you do, replace the
word testing with the name stretch in all 4 of those lines. Then update -
however you do that in Synaptic.
Ok thank you, I think it worked. I reloaded and no p
On Fri 10 Feb 2017 at 10:43:00 +, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
[We are are talking about some using the testing distribution].
> I did not upgrade this time, just left it where it is as "if it ain't
> broke don't fix it" wondering why this is. I think the uneasiness comes
> from the feeling of not bei
Greg Wooledge:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:43:00AM +, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>> If I understand the freeze process well (I think I
>> don't) why would updated packages appear today on the list?
>
> The freeze means that only bug fixes go in. No new upstream versions,
> unless it's a very speci
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:43:00AM +, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> If I understand the freeze process well (I think I
> don't) why would updated packages appear today on the list?
The freeze means that only bug fixes go in. No new upstream versions,
unless it's a very special case.
Lisi Reisz:
>> In most cases documents simplify that stretch is testing,
Ok, got it, I think your post helps the archive.
I don't think I should open a new post/thread for one more
clarification. If I understand the freeze process well (I think I
don't) why would updated packages appear today on
Lisi Reisz:
> Right, so if you wish to remain on Stretch, which I think you do, replace the
> word testing with the name stretch in all 4 of those lines. Then update -
> however you do that in Synaptic.
Ok thank you, I think it worked. I reloaded and no packages needed any
updating. A quick
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 2:51 AM, GiaThnYgeia
wrote:
> [...]
> The Debian 7 pc stayed this way, I used it as an example that if I had
> switched it to testing on wheezy would I be in stretch now? And I
> assume the answer would be yes unless I again misunderstand how it works.
Maybe, if you had d
Hi, Greg,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 12:29:00PM +, GiaThnYgeia wrote:
>> It may seem silly to most of you but not very clear. If in the synaptic
>> repository list one has used testing in Jessie
>
> What?!
>
>> by now the system has
>> con
On Thursday 09 February 2017 20:46:14 Brian wrote:
> Sid is unstable and unstable is Sid. It doesn't matter which one
> is chosen to be in sources.list.
Agreed. But I like patterns. ;-)
> Mind you, stable is Jessie and Jessie
> is stable. It's only testing/whatever you have to be careful about
On Thu 09 Feb 2017 at 15:48:57 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 08:46:14PM +, Brian wrote:
> > Mind you, stable is Jessie and Jessie
> > is stable. It's only testing/whatever you have to be careful about.
>
> "jessie" and "stable" are synonymous for the moment, but that w
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 08:46:14PM +, Brian wrote:
> Mind you, stable is Jessie and Jessie
> is stable. It's only testing/whatever you have to be careful about.
"jessie" and "stable" are synonymous for the moment, but that will not
continue indefinitely into the future. When stretch releases,
On Thu 09 Feb 2017 at 18:58:34 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 09 February 2017 17:51:00 GiaThnYgeia wrote:
> > Lisi Reisz:
> > > So let's start at the beginning.
> >
> > OK
> >
> > > What exactly does your sources.list currently say?
> > > (/etc/apt/sources.list) Please copy and paste it.
1 - 100 of 320 matches
Mail list logo
