On Wednesday 09 November 2016 14:50:03 Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> But let's just clarify that these authentication failures are not
> because of MTA configuration only but also a matter of
> Google's "email relay hardening".
That is why it is a matter for _Google_ and your relationship with Google,
On 7 November 2016 at 19:56, Henning Follmann wrote:
>
> Amen!
> This should now be official gospel for the rest of this thread.
>
> Class dismissed.
>
Agreed.
But let's just clarify that these authentication failures are not
because of MTA configuration only but also a matter of
Google's "email
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:32:24PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 16:32:24 +0200, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
>
> > On 7 November 2016 at 15:52, David Wright wrote:
> > >
> > > Did you encode it in Base64, or is what you type it into
> > > doing this on your behalf?
> > >
> >
> > Just t
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 16:32:24 +0200, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> On 7 November 2016 at 15:52, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > Did you encode it in Base64, or is what you type it into
> > doing this on your behalf?
> >
>
> Just typed the password, as always. Meaning unencoded.
> This is another part t
On Monday 07 November 2016 12:52:30 Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> - update the corresponding debian's wiki page on reportbug
Since you obviously don't want to use any of what has been suggested, and
since reportbug seems to be the only/main(?) bugbear, why not:
Purge reportbug
Make sure you have rem
On 7 November 2016 at 15:52, David Wright wrote:
>
> Did you encode it in Base64, or is what you type it into
> doing this on your behalf?
>
Just typed the password, as always. Meaning unencoded.
This is another part that maybe I haven't cleared out.
I never had an MTA setup, I always had the po
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 14:46:01 (+0200), Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> On 7 November 2016 at 00:51, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 03:44:49PM +, Brian wrote:
> >>
> >> I'd agree with that (it can be tested if needs be). In his reportbug
> >> preferences file Sophoklis Goumas has
>
On 6 November 2016 at 17:48, Henning Follmann wrote:
>
> You are submitting directly to googles MTA.
> You have to figure out, how google expects you to authenticate.
>
This is exactly the purpose of this thread, let's investigate of a way that one:
- could sent directly to Google's MTA but
- wit
On 6 November 2016 at 17:07, Brad Rogers wrote:
> ...
>
> It's google being google. It's their servers, their rules. Like I said,
> it is possible to configure a google account to allow connections to
> non-google software, but where to find the right box to (un)tick, I have
> no idea.
>
http:/
On 7 November 2016 at 00:51, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 03:44:49PM +, Brian wrote:
>>
>> I'd agree with that (it can be tested if needs be). In his reportbug
>> preferences file Sophoklis Goumas has
>>
>> smtphost "smtp.gmail.com:587"
>> smtpuser "olspookishma...@gmail.co
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 03:44:49PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 06 Nov 2016 at 10:28:38 -0500, Henning Follmann wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> > > On 6 November 2016 at 14:20, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Because google consider anything not
from the link that i posted earlier-
https://www.howtoforge.com/tutorial/configure-postfix-to-use-gmail-as-a-mail-relay/
you are supposed to have these in your main.cf-
relayhost = [smtp.gmail.com]:587
smtp_use_tls = yes
smtp_sasl_auth_enable = yes
smtp_sasl_security_options =
smtp_sasl_password_m
On Sun 06 Nov 2016 at 10:28:38 -0500, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> > On 6 November 2016 at 14:20, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > >
> > > Because google consider anything not written by them to be "insecure".
> > > For some time now google h
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 04:53:39PM +0200, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> On 6 November 2016 at 13:54, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > You haven't said what email client you are using, for a start. Some people
> > have assumed that you are using your own mail server. Are you? Are you
> > perhaps ju
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> On 6 November 2016 at 14:20, Brad Rogers wrote:
> >
> > Because google consider anything not written by them to be "insecure".
> > For some time now google has disallowed (by default) what they deem to be
> > insecure connections.
On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 16:57:02 +0200
Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
Hello Sophoklis,
>Is Google just being stubborn or are they just actually trying to
>enforce, in their way, some more secure way which reportbug is not
>compatible to comply with yet?
It's google being google. It's their servers, their
On 6 November 2016 at 14:20, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
> Because google consider anything not written by them to be "insecure".
> For some time now google has disallowed (by default) what they deem to be
> insecure connections. As a result, one has to alter settings to "allow
> unsafe connections", or
On 6 November 2016 at 13:54, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> ...
>
> You haven't said what email client you are using, for a start. Some people
> have assumed that you are using your own mail server. Are you? Are you
> perhaps just using Gmail's own mail interface??
>
Postfix.
Here is my /etc/postfix/main
On 5 November 2016 at 23:56, emetib wrote:
> On Saturday, November 5, 2016 at 4:00:03 PM UTC-5, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
>
> i'm not a sysadmin, yet from what people are saying in there reports, no.
>
Ok.
>
> when is the last time that you used this before this rejection?
>
20160413
https://bugs
On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 07:16:29 -0500
Henning Follmann wrote:
Hello Henning,
This is really for the benefit of the OP, rather than yourself
>So you said that you were able to relay mails axacly this way and now
>it's not working anymore?
Because google consider anything not written by them to
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 06:22:56PM +0200, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> On 5 November 2016 at 17:47, Henning Follmann
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 04:42:55PM +0200, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> > What's not to understand. You do not authenticate properly.
> >
>
> Well, some useful feedback to i
On Saturday 05 November 2016 21:05:06 Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> I have supplied more information in my initial message:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2016/11/msg00087.html
That is a matter of opinion.
You haven't said what email client you are using, for a start. Some people
have assum
On Saturday, November 5, 2016 at 4:00:03 PM UTC-5, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, November 5, 2016 at 9:50:04 AM UTC-5, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> > ...
> >
> >>
> >> Does one need to to enable adjust appropriately the "Allow less secure
> >> apps" setting [1] ?
> >>
> > yes
> >
> > htt
On 5 November 2016 at 21:27, Michael Milliman
wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 09:30 -0700, emetib wrote:
> It would help to know exactly what the problem is that you are having.
> What email client are you using? What is happenning? It is impossible to
> give you any real information without kno
On 5 November 2016 at 18:30, emetib wrote:
> On Saturday, November 5, 2016 at 9:50:04 AM UTC-5, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> ...
>
>>
>> Does one need to to enable adjust appropriately the "Allow less secure
>> apps" setting [1] ?
>>
> yes
>
> https://www.howtoforge.com/tutorial/configure-postfix-to-
On Sat, 2016-11-05 at 09:30 -0700, emetib wrote:
> On Saturday, November 5, 2016 at 9:50:04 AM UTC-5, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Anybody else having troubles when using GMails' SMTP servers?
> >
> no
It would help to know exactly what the problem is that you are having.
What email
On Saturday, November 5, 2016 at 9:50:04 AM UTC-5, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Anybody else having troubles when using GMails' SMTP servers?
>
no
> Does one need to to enable adjust appropriately the "Allow less secure
> apps" setting [1] ?
>
yes
https://www.howtoforge.com/tutorial/con
On 5 November 2016 at 17:47, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 04:42:55PM +0200, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> What's not to understand. You do not authenticate properly.
>
Well, some useful feedback to it would be if someone just using those
configurations options I've showcased (or
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 04:42:55PM +0200, Sophoklis Goumas wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Anybody else having troubles when using GMails' SMTP servers?
>
> Does one need to to enable adjust appropriately the "Allow less secure
> apps" setting [1] ?
>
> Excerpts from my ~/.reportbugrc:
> smtphost "smtp.gmai
Hello.
Anybody else having troubles when using GMails' SMTP servers?
Does one need to to enable adjust appropriately the "Allow less secure
apps" setting [1] ?
Excerpts from my ~/.reportbugrc:
smtphost "smtp.gmail.com:587"
smtpuser "olspookishma...@gmail.com"
smtptls
Error messages received:
En
30 matches
Mail list logo
