Re: rebuilding packages

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:06:59AM +0200, John Smith wrote: > On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:25:39 -0400 > "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:53:04PM +0200, John Smith wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > caused by various reasons (disagree with compiled in def

Re: rebuilding packages

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:25:39 -0400 "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:53:04PM +0200, John Smith wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > caused by various reasons (disagree with compiled in defaults, learning > > stuff) I compiled a few packages from source from th

Re: rebuilding packages

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:53:04PM +0200, John Smith wrote: > Hi All, > > caused by various reasons (disagree with compiled in defaults, learning > stuff) I compiled a few packages from source from the project (apt-get source > ...). > I found out that in some cases (notably snmpd and glibc

rebuilding packages

Hi All, caused by various reasons (disagree with compiled in defaults, learning stuff) I compiled a few packages from source from the project (apt-get source ...). I found out that in some cases (notably snmpd and glibc) the rebuilding of the source actually produces more .deb's than I ex