gene heskett writes:
> Is this info helpful?
I don't know really. I was thinking about the file dialogs or requestors
and how they often try access previously used locations. For example,
I've learned not to download with Firefox to a network drive.
I don't know if Firefox is still like that bu
> I've no idea how to start debugging this but I feel like the problem
`strace` maybe?
Stefan
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 12:00:00AM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> On 12/14/23 18:36, gene heskett wrote:
> > Thunar, yes, but I don't use it, not my cup of tea.
[…]
> It sounds like OpenSCAD and gidislicer have something in common that is
> causing the issue, while the other apps do no
On 12/14/23 18:36, gene heskett wrote:
On 12/14/23 16:36, Anssi Saari wrote:
gene heskett writes:
It repeats per gui access. Starting a gfx program such as OpenSCAD, or
qidislicer from an xfce4 terminal cli, is delayed for this similar but
not always identical lag. And reports odd warnings et
On 12/14/23 16:36, Anssi Saari wrote:
gene heskett writes:
It repeats per gui access. Starting a gfx program such as OpenSCAD, or
qidislicer from an xfce4 terminal cli, is delayed for this similar but
not always identical lag. And reports odd warnings etc while its
getting ready to open its gu
gene heskett writes:
> It repeats per gui access. Starting a gfx program such as OpenSCAD, or
> qidislicer from an xfce4 terminal cli, is delayed for this similar but
> not always identical lag. And reports odd warnings etc while its
> getting ready to open its gui.
Does this happen with common
On 12/14/23 04:17, Nicolas George wrote:
to...@tuxteam.de (12023-12-14):
I've skimmed some of the answers, and they correspond to your confusing
request. Someone mentions DNS timeouts to rule them out right away (do
you access your RAID over the net? Is DNS resolution involved at all?)
no, and
On 12/14/23 00:39, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 10:26:19AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
Greetings all;
I thought I was doing things right a year back when I built a raid10 for my
/home partition. but I'm tired of fighting with it for access. Anything that
wants to open a file o
On 12/13/23 15:33, gene heskett wrote:
gene@coyote:~$ time dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/gene/zero bs=1M count=100
oflag=sync
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes (105 MB, 100 MiB) copied, 0.935655 s, 112 MB/s
real 0m0.940s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m0.254s
Thank you for providin
On 12/13/23 16:30, Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 10:26:19AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
I thought I was doing things right a year back when I built a raid10 for my
/home partition. but I'm tired of fighting with it for access. Anything that
wants to open a file on it, is subje
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 02:19:07PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> On 12/13/23 13:24, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 10:26:19AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> > > Greetings all;
> > >
> >
> > Hi Gene,
> >
> > Respectfully, if I were you, I might consider tearing down one machine
On 12/13/23 13:24, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 10:26:19AM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
Greetings all;
I thought I was doing things right a year back when I built a raid10 for my
/home partition. but I'm tired of fighting with it for access. Anything that
wants to open a file
On 12/13/23 13:50, Dan Ritter wrote:
Pocket wrote:
Many reasons
If the RAID controller bites the bullet you are usually toast unless you
have another RAID controller (same manufacturer and type) as a spare.
mdadm, zfs and btrfs all lack this problem.
Not for me as I am not going do
On 12/13/23 13:47, Nicolas George wrote:
Pocket (12023-12-13):
If the RAID controller
Then use software RAID with a Libre implementation.
Nope been there done that and I ain't doing that
I found it is better to just have my data on several backup disks
Yeah, backups and RAID are not
Pocket wrote:
>
> Many reasons
>
> If the RAID controller bites the bullet you are usually toast unless you
> have another RAID controller (same manufacturer and type) as a spare.
mdadm, zfs and btrfs all lack this problem.
> I have zero luck replacing one companies raid controller wit
gene heskett writes:
> It is a separate 6 port sata controller because the mobo is out of
> ports. There is no obvious lag during bios post or grub booting it.
That *should* rule out DNS then, unless something really strange is
going on. What does mdadm tell you about the raid device, and its
c
Pocket (12023-12-13):
> If the RAID controller
Then use software RAID with a Libre implementation.
> I found it is better to just have my data on several backup disks
Yeah, backups and RAID are not meant to protect against the same issues,
so if you think one replaces the other…
> After removin
On 12/13/23 13:20, gene heskett wrote:
On 12/13/23 11:51, Pocket wrote:
On 12/13/23 10:26, gene heskett wrote:
Greetings all;
I thought I was doing things right a year back when I built a raid10
for my /home partition. but I'm tired of fighting with it for
access. Anything that wants to o
On 12/13/23 11:51, Pocket wrote:
On 12/13/23 10:26, gene heskett wrote:
Greetings all;
I thought I was doing things right a year back when I built a raid10
for my /home partition. but I'm tired of fighting with it for access.
Anything that wants to open a file on it, is subjected to a freeze
On 12/13/23 10:41, Tom Furie wrote:
gene heskett writes:
I thought I was doing things right a year back when I built a raid10
for my /home partition. but I'm tired of fighting with it for
access. Anything that wants to open a file on it, is subjected to a
freeze of at least 30 seconds BEFORE t
20 matches
Mail list logo
