On Wednesday 24 March 2004 6:48 pm, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Todays' will work, as far as I can tell. I verified it the hard way an hour
> ago.
LOL, I like that answer... wanna wee nip of scotch? ya sound like you
could use it
--
The real fun of living wisely is that you get to feel
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 6:46 pm, Brad Sims wrote:
> As I understand it several versions are screaming about not
> actually booting.. what is the last known good Sid version?
It looks like one can pass rw to the kernel at boot to fix this..
is the syntax "linux rw"?
--
The real fun of living w
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Brad Sims wrote:
> As I understand it several versions are screaming about not
> actually booting.. what is the last known good Sid version?
Todays' will work, as far as I can tell. I verified it the hard way an hour
ago.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find th
As I understand it several versions are screaming about not
actually booting.. what is the last known good Sid version?
--
The real fun of living wisely is that you get to feel smug about it
-- Hobbes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 08:10:25PM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> Read /etc/init.d/README and /usr/share/doc/sysvinit/README.runlevels.gz
Looks good. Cheers.
--
S. Burgener
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux 2.2
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ian Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Sven> "specification" for this? Or does it simply not matter? :)
>
>AFAIK there's no written standard for this yet, but soon there will be
>(the Linux Standard Base). You can check their drafts.
Read /etc/init.d/README and
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 09:15:01PM +0200, Sven Burgener wrote:
>
> In their manual, SuSE document that upon changing from say runlevel
> 2 to 3, first all links matching /sbin/init.d/rc2.d/K* get executed
> and then the links matching /sbin/init.d/rc3.d/S*. (Funnily they have
> init.d under /sb
> "Sven" == Sven Burgener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
itz> Why is it this way? Well, there's really no way to tell init to
itz> execute programs upon _exiting_ a runlevel, or upon a transition
itz> from one level to another; the /etc/inittab that defines
itz> runlevels is one-dimensional. So
On Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 10:19:10AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> level). Then the S scripts start everything that is needed, again
> potentially restarting things that were already active on the old
> level (although Debian avoids that as a matter of optimization).
See.
> Why is it this way? W
Sven> Hi all I wanted to know why that when changing runlevels from
Sven> say 2 to 3, the KILL links of _3_ and not 2 get executed before
Sven> starting the START links of 3...?
Marshal> I think because K comes before S. So switching run levels
Marshal> only runs the scripts in the runlevel dirc
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 08:38:55PM -0700, Marshal Wong wrote:
> > Hi all I wanted to know why that when changing runlevels from
> > say 2 to 3, the KILL links of _3_ and not 2 get executed before
> > starting the START links of 3...?
> I think because K comes before S. So switching r
Hi all
I wanted to know why that when changing runlevels from say 2 to 3, the
KILL links of _3_ and not 2 get executed before starting the START links
of 3...?
I mean, at that point you're leaving runlevel 2 and it would only make
sense to stop those runlevel's services and not the new runlevel's
12 matches
Mail list logo
