Re: qmail package in bullseye

2021-12-24 Thread 황병희
Dan Ritter writes: > [...] > In particular, Debian has the mailfront package, which is Bruce > Guenter's qmail-compatible set of tools. From the description: > > It contains complete SMTP, QMQP, QMTP, and POP3 front-ends as well as > an authentication module for IMAP. The mail delivery front

Re: qmail package in bullseye

2021-12-24 Thread ed neville
On 2021-12-24 17:00+0200, Georgi Naplatanov wrote: > On 12/24/21 14:58, 황병희 wrote: > > Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong? > The software seems unmaintained for a long time [1]. According to > wikipedia the last release is from 1998 and I think there was

Re: qmail package in bullseye

2021-12-24 Thread Dan Ritter
황병희 wrote: > > 3) Build and install qmail from your preferred source tree. And I've seen your posts on the qmail list, so you should definitely take their advice on which version to use. > > 4) Set up the symlink from /usr/sbin/sendmail to /var/qmail/bin/sendmail > >or wherever you placed th

Re: qmail package in bullseye

2021-12-24 Thread Georgi Naplatanov
On 12/24/21 14:58, 황병희 wrote: > Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong? The software seems unmaintained for a long time [1]. According to wikipedia the last release is from 1998 and I think there was an incompatibility with the qmail's license and Debian. I've

Re: qmail package in bullseye

2021-12-24 Thread 황병희
Dear Greg, Greg Wooledge writes: > On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:58:11PM +0900, 황병희 wrote: >> Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong? > > If you wish to use qmail, the recommended way to do it is: > > 1) Install equivs, and use it to build the "mta-

Re: qmail package in bullseye

2021-12-24 Thread 황병희
Andy Smith writes: > Hello, > > On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:58:11PM +0900, 황병희 wrote: >> Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong? > > It was removed from Debian in May 2020 and hasn't been in a release > since buster: > > https://b

Re: qmail package in bullseye

2021-12-24 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:58:11PM +0900, 황병희 wrote: > Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong? If you wish to use qmail, the recommended way to do it is: 1) Install equivs, and use it to build the "mta-local" package. There's an example file for it:

Re: qmail package in bullseye

2021-12-24 Thread Andy Smith
Hello, On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:58:11PM +0900, 황병희 wrote: > Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong? It was removed from Debian in May 2020 and hasn't been in a release since buster: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961289 If you still have

Re: qmail package in bullseye

2021-12-24 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
It seems that netqmail (the package that provides qmail) was removed last year: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961289 On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:58:11PM +0900, 황병희 wrote: > Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong? > Bellow are my environments: >

qmail package in bullseye

2021-12-24 Thread 황병희
Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong? Bellow are my environments: -- System Information: Debian Release: 11.2 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x8