John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Feb 1999, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 07:50:57AM +0100, Frederick Page wrote:
> > > Well I tried pine at first (it did news, but not too good), then tried
> > > SLRN, which was pretty good, but had no nice filtering/scoring. Then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 21 Feb 1999 21:13:38 -0700 (MST), John Galt wrote:
>I dunno about scoring--I rarely use the function, but I re-migrated back
>to TRN when I realized that SLRN had no killfiles, what I consider to be
>an essential tool in USENET.
Uhm... U
Hi John Galt,
you wrote on Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 09:13:38PM -0700:
>I dunno about scoring--I rarely use the function, but I re-migrated back
>to TRN when I realized that SLRN had no killfiles, what I consider to be
>an essential tool in USENET.
You might want to read /usr/doc/slrn/SCORE_FAQ.gz, I
I dunno about scoring--I rarely use the function, but I re-migrated back
to TRN when I realized that SLRN had no killfiles, what I consider to be
an essential tool in USENET.
On Sun, 21 Feb 1999, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 07:50:57AM +0100, Frederick Page wrote:
> > Well I tried
On Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 07:50:57AM +0100, Frederick Page wrote:
> Well I tried pine at first (it did news, but not too good), then tried
> SLRN, which was pretty good, but had no nice filtering/scoring. Then
> I tried tin and it's IMHO great.
Aroo? In what way is SLRN's scoring poor? IMHO it
Hi Steve Lamb,
you wrote on Sat, Feb 20, 1999 at 09:22:34PM -0800:
>*WHY!?* Anyone familiar with mutt would know that it was modeled after
>a newsreader, SLRN! So why contribute to bloat by having those two
>functions in the same program, especially mutt, when one can have mutt and
>slrn with s
On Sat, Feb 20, 1999 at 04:39:38PM -0500, Adam Lazur wrote:
> Steve Willer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > Now I use mutt and tin and am quite happy with both.
> >
> > Sounds like mutt wasn't too good for news either.
>
> AFAIK mutt isn't currently meant to be a news reader. There are
> patches t
Steve Willer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Now I use mutt and tin and am quite happy with both.
>
> Sounds like mutt wasn't too good for news either.
AFAIK mutt isn't currently meant to be a news reader. There are
patches to make it do news however, but they aren't incorporated into
the stable (B
On Sat, 20 Feb 1999, Frederick Page wrote:
> It's the other way around here: I used Pine for email and news, was
> content about the way it handled email, but it sucked for news. And it
> did not have color, which is very helpful (for me).
There is a patch available for Pine that gives it some c
On Sat, Feb 20, 1999 at 11:05:56AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
>problems using mutt to send mail to a lot of people at once. Pine's way
>of handling the addressbook and aliases works better for me.
It's the other way around here: I used Pine for email and news, was
content about the way it handle
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Shao Zhang wrote:
> So, do you think it is worth switching to mutt? Is it better in
> terms of supporting mutiple folders??
I have used pine for quite a few years and tried out mutt for a few weeks
last year - just to return to pine. I do not like mutt. Maybe I could
On Fri, Feb 19, 1999 at 11:05:24PM +1100, Shao Zhang wrote:
Hi Shao,
I've used pine for about 1 year never expirience too much,
after switching the linux distribution from SuSE to Debian (2.0)
i could'nt find pine, however.
Therefore I have a look to mutt and installed this package
after a couple o
Hi,
I have been a happy pine user. But recently, I have heard that
many people are using mutt, and it is really good & configurable.
So, do you think it is worth switching to mutt? Is it better in
terms of supporting mutiple folders??
Thanks.
Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2
13 matches
Mail list logo
