Re: perf question 100,000 directories vs 1 directory

2006-10-21 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/21/06 01:08, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:03:12PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I believe the reason we're using individual databases is for marketing >> purposes. aparently being >> able to say its a single tenent

Re: perf question 100,000 directories vs 1 directory

2006-10-21 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/21/06 01:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I believe the reason we're using individual databases is for > marketing purposes. aparently being able to say its a single > tenent application is a selling point. Eh. That's why I switched from b-scho

Re: perf question 100,000 directories vs 1 directory

2006-10-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: Roberto C. Sanchez To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 02:08:50 -0400 Subject: Re: perf question 100,000 directories vs 1 directory On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:03:12PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I believe the reason we'

Re: perf question 100,000 directories vs 1 directory

2006-10-20 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:03:12PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I believe the reason we're using individual databases is for marketing > purposes. aparently being > able to say its a single tenent application is a selling point. > > Although if its going to be too problematic we may switch t

Re: perf question 100,000 directories vs 1 directory

2006-10-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I believe the reason we're using individual databases is for marketing purposes. aparently being able to say its a single tenent application is a selling point. Although if its going to be too problematic we may switch to a single db. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/20/06 1

Re: perf question 100,000 directories vs 1 directory

2006-10-20 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/20/06 13:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working on a database application. We're going to have multiple > logins, say 100,000. By "logins", do you mean "user accounts"? > Performance wise would we see a difference if we had 100,

Re: perf question 100,000 directories vs 1 directory

2006-10-20 Thread Mladen Adamovic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm working on a database application. We're going to have multiple logins, say 100,000. Performance wise would we see a difference if we had 100,000 directories with each users database in its own directory, versus having 1 directory with all 100,000 databases in that si

perf question 100,000 directories vs 1 directory

2006-10-20 Thread misc
Hello, I'm working on a database application. We're going to have multiple logins, say 100,000. Performance wise would we see a difference if we had 100,000 directories with each users database in its own directory, versus having 1 directory with all 100,000 databases in that single directory?