On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:14, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, reading your earlier post I also tried to setup PA ... and it
> worked (aplay -Dpulse foo.wav worked) ! However, from PA's wiki page it
> appears that it doesn't work with audacious yet and neither with
> audacity. I use both.
On Fri,21.Nov.08, 14:14:34, H.S. wrote:
> BTW, reading your earlier post I also tried to setup PA ... and it
> worked (aplay -Dpulse foo.wav worked) ! However, from PA's wiki page it
> appears that it doesn't work with audacious yet and neither with
audacious works (for me at least) with pulse,
Kelly Clowers wrote:
>
> I dug around and found the modinfo command...
>
> $ sudo modinfo sound
> filename: /lib/modules/2.6.26-1-686/kernel/sound/oss/sound.ko
> author: Hannu Savolainen, et al.
> description:OSS Sound subsystem
>
>
> vs.
>
> $ sudo modinfo snd-pcm-oss
> file
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 01:56, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/20/08 23:03, H.S. wrote:
>>
>> Kelly Clowers wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:58 PM, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> If your machine runs kernel 2.6, it shouldn't have OSS.
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
Hello,
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:39:15AM -0500, H.S. wrote:
>> Kelly Clowers wrote:
> ...
And in KDE's sound configuration gui, one of the
systems to choose from is OSS.
>>> Probably hardwired, and would show up in any case.
> ...
> this does make sense. Ho
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:39:15AM -0500, H.S. wrote:
> Kelly Clowers wrote:
...
> >> And in KDE's sound configuration gui, one of the
> >> systems to choose from is OSS.
> >
> > Probably hardwired, and would show up in any case.
...
this does make sense. However, if I select OSS from KDE's
Hi,
I agree that if you have modern system (bought new last 5 years or so),
you should be OK with ALSA. But let's be more precise beyond this.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 03:56:22AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
...
> Given that OSS has been deprecated for FIVE years, and I *VERY STRONGLY*
> doubt that
Kelly Clowers wrote:
>
> I believe that is "provides" in the package dependency sense, and is
> for compatibility and because of alsa oss emulation. AFAIK, oss has
> no userspace component, so nothing would show up in apt.
Yes, that is what first did before starting this thread. It gave
nothing.
On 11/21/08 09:16, H.S. wrote:
Kelly Clowers wrote:
I think you do have it, but I doubt it is in use. You could look at
lsmod output and compare it to the modules in
/lib/modules/2.6.xxx/kernel/sound/oss.
I have a bunch of modules there. I will check if any of those are
loaded. Which brings me
Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> You have linux-sound-base. Well, so do I.
Good. But I recommend another post in this thread which gives useful
information about this.
> But there are only 2 OSS drivers in "recent" (going back to st least
st?
> 2.6.16) kernels, so even though you have linux-sound-bas
Kelly Clowers wrote:
>
> I think you do have it, but I doubt it is in use. You could look at
> lsmod output and compare it to the modules in
> /lib/modules/2.6.xxx/kernel/sound/oss.
I have a bunch of modules there. I will check if any of those are
loaded. Which brings me to this point: check for
On 11/21/08 08:52, H.S. wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Here's a slightly different question: what makes you think that you *do*
have OSS?
Please see my other recent posts.
You have linux-sound-base. Well, so do I.
But there are only 2 OSS drivers in "recent" (going back to st least
2.6.16) ke
Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> Here's a slightly different question: what makes you think that you *do*
> have OSS?
Please see my other recent posts.
--
Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its corresponding
newsgroup on gmane.org. Replies sent to my email address are just
filtered to
On 11/20/08 23:03, H.S. wrote:
Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:58 PM, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
If your machine runs kernel 2.6, it shouldn't have OSS.
lsmod will list your loaded modules. snd_pcm_oss, snd_mixer_oss,
and snd_seq_oss, are all part of t
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 21:03, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kelly Clowers wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:58 PM, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Ron Johnson wrote:
If your machine runs kernel 2.6, it shouldn't have OSS.
>
>>
>> lsmod will list your loaded modules. snd_pcm_oss, snd
Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:58 PM, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> If your machine runs kernel 2.6, it shouldn't have OSS.
>
> lsmod will list your loaded modules. snd_pcm_oss, snd_mixer_oss,
> and snd_seq_oss, are all part of the alsa oss emulation.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:58 PM, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyone?
>>
>> If your machine runs kernel 2.6, it shouldn't have OSS.
>>
>
> hmm ... ookay. Does that mean both are orthogonal? And, yes, I am
> running 2.6.
I am not sure that that is true. I think Debia
Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Anyone?
>
> If your machine runs kernel 2.6, it shouldn't have OSS.
>
hmm ... ookay. Does that mean both are orthogonal? And, yes, I am
running 2.6.
--
Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its corresponding
newsgroup on gmane.org. Replies sent to my ema
On 11/20/08 21:29, H.S. wrote:
H.S. wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
And can I remove OSS in favor of Alsa?
Yes.
This is what I am most interested in ... how exactly?
Anyone?
If your machine runs kernel 2.6, it shouldn't have OSS.
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
If you don't agree wit
H.S. wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>>> And can I remove OSS in favor of Alsa?
>> Yes.
>
> This is what I am most interested in ... how exactly?
>
>
Anyone?
--
Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its corresponding
newsgroup on gmane.org. Replies sent to my email address are j
On Thu,20.Nov.08, 16:59:06, H.S. wrote:
> So my next query is how do I find out if any application in Debian
> requires OSS other than using the obvious brute force method? Is it even
> possible?
Usually the package description mentions it, but I doubt there is a
maintained software that doesn
H.S. wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Sound_System#OSS_in_relation_to_ALSA
>>
>>OSS is the standard up through the 2.4 series of official
>>(kernel.org) Linux kernels. ALSA was added starting with 2.5,
>>and in those versions, Linux kernel authors marked
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 11/20/08 14:27, H.S. wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Could somebody give some insights in to how is OSS related to Alsa? When
>
> I hate to sound rude, but did you apply any effort in researching this
> yourself?
Yes, but it was a while ago. At that time, I must admit though, I kn
On 11/20/08 14:27, H.S. wrote:
Hello,
Could somebody give some insights in to how is OSS related to Alsa? When
I hate to sound rude, but did you apply any effort in researching
this yourself?
a headset is connected via USB, how is it supposed to be detected, as an
OSS device or as a USB de
Hello,
Could somebody give some insights in to how is OSS related to Alsa? When
a headset is connected via USB, how is it supposed to be detected, as an
OSS device or as a USB device?
And can I remove OSS in favor of Alsa?
Thanks.
--
Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its corr
25 matches
Mail list logo
