On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:29:56AM +, Mark C wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 00:11, CW Harris wrote:
>
> > As a guess-- did you define your internal network to be funkypenguin.net
> > and authoritative for the domain? Thus there is no DNS path out of your
> > LAN to the real authority for funk
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:29:56AM +, Mark C wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 00:11, CW Harris wrote:
>
> > As a guess-- did you define your internal network to be funkypenguin.net
> > and authoritative for the domain? Thus there is no DNS path out of your
> > LAN to the real authority for funk
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 00:11, CW Harris wrote:
> As a guess-- did you define your internal network to be funkypenguin.net
> and authoritative for the domain? Thus there is no DNS path out of your
> LAN to the real authority for funkypenguin.net?
>
> Give us more info on how you have your domain s
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:10:18PM +, Mark C wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just set up bind for my internal network, and running:
>
> 'nslookup funkypenguin.net' returns:
>
> Note: nslookup is deprecated and may be removed from future releases.
> Consider using the `dig' or `host' programs instead
Hi,
I've just set up bind for my internal network, and running:
'nslookup funkypenguin.net' returns:
Note: nslookup is deprecated and may be removed from future releases.
Consider using the `dig' or `host' programs instead. Run nslookup with
the `-sil[ent]' option to prevent this message from
5 matches
Mail list logo