Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Andrew J. Barr wrote:
Now if they could only
figure out some way to do something similar for the Intel Centrino radios...
Andrew
It's been done - but you have to go to the SourceForge site to get the
firmware - which requires you to sign an Intel licence agreement -
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 03:40:31PM -0400, Andrew J. Barr wrote:
> Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 07:44:13PM +0100, andy wrote:
> >>Hello
> >>
> >>I have, since installing Etch, been downloading packages with regard for
> >>functionality and because I wanted that program, rathe
Andrew J. Barr wrote:
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 07:44:13PM +0100, andy wrote:
Hello
I have, since installing Etch, been downloading packages with regard
for functionality and because I wanted that program, rather than
focusing on whether or not that package was non-fre
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 07:44:13PM +0100, andy wrote:
Hello
I have, since installing Etch, been downloading packages with regard for
functionality and because I wanted that program, rather than focusing on
whether or not that package was non-free or free (with respect
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 07:44:13PM +0100, andy wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have, since installing Etch, been downloading packages with regard for
> functionality and because I wanted that program, rather than focusing on
> whether or not that package was non-free or free (with respect to the
> Debian
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 07:44:13PM +0100, andy wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have, since installing Etch, been downloading packages with regard for
> functionality and because I wanted that program, rather than focusing on
> whether or not that package was non-free or free (with respect to the
> Debian
Hello
I have, since installing Etch, been downloading packages with regard for
functionality and because I wanted that program, rather than focusing on
whether or not that package was non-free or free (with respect to the
Debian commitment to free software).
I am curious about the packages I
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Every once in a while I need to install a non-free package, so my system
> does have some non-free packages installed. What command can I use to find
> out what packages are those (so I can remove them or replace them with free
> alternatives)?
"apt
On Monday 11 September 2006 10:51, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Every once in a while I need to install a non-free package, so my system
> does have some non-free packages installed. What command can I use to find
> out what packages are those (so I can remove them or replace them
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Every once in a while I need to install a non-free package, so my system
> does have some non-free packages installed. What command can I use to find
> out what packages are those (so I can remove them or replace them with free
> alternatives)?
grep-sta
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Every once in a while I need to install a non-free package, so my system
> does have some non-free packages installed. What command can I use to find
> out what packages are those (so I can remove them or replace them with free
> alternatives)?
vrms (virtu
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:51:39AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Every once in a while I need to install a non-free package, so my system
> does have some non-free packages installed. What command can I use to find
> out what packages are those (so I can remove them or replace them
Every once in a while I need to install a non-free package, so my system
does have some non-free packages installed. What command can I use to find
out what packages are those (so I can remove them or replace them with free
alternatives)?
Similarly for packages from `unstable, or `experimental
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 01:32:05PM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> What is the command to see how much non-free software I have
> installed? I.e. those with Section: non-free... in Packages.gz
vrms?
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :
, and report all of the packages from the
non-free
tree which are currently installed.
.
Future versions of vrms will include an option to also display text
from the
public writings of RMS and others that explain why use of each of the
installed non-free packages might cause moral issues for some
What is the command to see how much non-free software I have
installed? I.e. those with Section: non-free... in Packages.gz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:51:48PM -0500, Narins, Josh wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 03:06:05PM +0800, Tim Wood wrote:
> >> I get a parsing error in unstable non-free Packages, which results in
> >> "Dynamic MMap ran out of room" error.
> >> This o
>On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 03:06:05PM +0800, Tim Wood wrote:
>> I get a parsing error in unstable non-free Packages, which results in
>> "Dynamic MMap ran out of room" error.
>> This occurs parsing package graphviz (NewVersion1).
>>
>> If this is a bug
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 03:06:05PM +0800, Tim Wood wrote:
> I get a parsing error in unstable non-free Packages, which results in
> "Dynamic MMap ran out of room" error.
> This occurs parsing package graphviz (NewVersion1).
>
> If this is a bug where do I report it as
Don't know if it's just me but I'm getting an error trying to update. I
get the same on:
ftp.wa.au.debian.org
ftp.au.debian.org
ftp.uk.debian.org
I get a parsing error in unstable non-free Packages, which results in
"Dynamic MMap ran out of room" error.
This occurs
On Wednesday 16 October 2002 05:33, Alvaro Figueroa wrote:
> It's probably a bit too soon, but does anyone knows if there are debian
> packages for the recently gpl'ed Blender?
>
> Even non-free packages won't do me mutch good... I'm a debian-sparc
> user.
no
It's probably a bit too soon, but does anyone knows if there are debian
packages for the recently gpl'ed Blender?
Even non-free packages won't do me mutch good... I'm a debian-sparc
user.
--
Alvaro Figueroa
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Richard Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RH> Are there official cd images?
RH> I have bought three CDs called "Official Debian 2.2" CDs 1-3.
RH> From the Linux Emporium in the UK.
Part of the point of the DFSG is that everything in Official Debian
(TM) is free to redistribute pretty much without r
Richard Hunt writes:
> I have bought three CDs called "Official Debian 2.2" CDs 1-3.
> From the Linux Emporium in the UK.
> I am told (on alt.os.linux) that they should contain the non-free section
> of the debian site, including netscape etc. But they don't.
I believe that I led you to believe t
Are there official cd images?
I have bought three CDs called "Official Debian 2.2" CDs 1-3.
From the Linux Emporium in the UK.
I am told (on alt.os.linux) that they should contain the non-free
section of the debian site, including netscape etc. But the don't
Does this mean some of the CD has n
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 04:44:00PM +0200, Wojciech Zabolotny wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What about the packages which are in non-free only because of the
> country-specific (usually US) patent restrictions?
> They can be used/distributed freely in almost the whole world except
> of single countries, an
Hi All,
What about the packages which are in non-free only because of the
country-specific (usually US) patent restrictions?
They can be used/distributed freely in almost the whole world except
of single countries, and do not contradict the DFSG.
This category includes such important things like
On Tue, 24 Feb 1998 Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@krypton.stern.nyu.edu
wrote:
> > > Great proposition. Unfortunately, both lesstif and gtk developers
> > > flamed me heavily while I was lurking on their lists :) May be it's my
> > > problem though...
> >
> > could be. it's hard to imagine
> > Great proposition. Unfortunately, both lesstif and gtk developers
> > flamed me heavily while I was lurking on their lists :) May be it's my
> > problem though...
>
> could be. it's hard to imagine that a lurker would get flamed. people
> usually only get flamed for saying something annoying
On Tue, 24 Feb 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > if you want wide distribution and adoption of your software in the free
> > software community, then use a free/open source toolkit. if you don't
> > care about that then use motif or some other proprietary toolkit.
>
> The thing here is that no fr
> that's fine, you can program in whatever toolkit you prefer.
Thanks :)
> however, you have to accept the fact that some of your choices may be
> incompatible with free software licensing.
Sure.
> if you want wide distribution and adoption of your software in the free
> software community, t
Graham Lillico +44 1785 248131 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also on another note, does anyone knoe if there is a graphical front end
> to the ipfwadm (Firewall) program? If not then I am currently
> considering writing one. The current plan is to produce both a ncurses
> version, and a HTML ver
On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Alex Yukhimets wrote:
> Guys, what I am doing is a high-quality gui programming. (sorry if it
> sounds a bit ... not humble). Even Motif is not enough for this kind
> of task. I am using most of the features of Motif 2.0 (those which
> are also present in 2.1) - this rules les
> > > I hope you'll put it under the GPL.
> >
> > Hope you wouldn't :)
> >
> > Since I wouldn't be able to create a Motif interface in case you put
> > it under GPL. I am having a big problems with GPL'd software now: I
> > am writing a Motif clone of WS_FTP and while the front-end is almost
> > r
On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Alex Yukhimets wrote:
> > > Also on another note, does anyone knoe if there is a graphical
> > > front end to the ipfwadm (Firewall) program? If not then I am
> > > currently considering writing one. The current plan is to produce
> > > both a ncurses version, and a HTML ver
> Also on another note, does anyone knoe if there is a graphical front end to
> the
> ipfwadm (Firewall) program? If not then I am currently considering writing
> one. The current plan is to produce both a ncurses version, and a HTML
> version. But why reinvent the wheel if there is already on
On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Alex Yukhimets wrote:
> > > Also on another note, does anyone knoe if there is a graphical front end
> > > to the
> > > ipfwadm (Firewall) program? If not then I am currently considering
> > > writing
> > > one. The current plan is to produce both a ncurses version, and a
> > Also on another note, does anyone knoe if there is a graphical front end to
> > the
> > ipfwadm (Firewall) program? If not then I am currently considering writing
> > one. The current plan is to produce both a ncurses version, and a HTML
> > version. But why reinvent the wheel if there is
On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Graham Lillico +44 1785 248131 wrote:
> Could someone please explain the concept of Non-Free Packages please (i.e.
> Pine
> etc).
Take a look at /usr/doc/debian/FAQ/debian-faq.txt.gz in section 5.6.1
where this is explained.
> It is just that I don't und
On Mon, Feb 23, 1998 at 02:11:44PM +, Graham Lillico +44 1785 248131 wrote:
> Could someone please explain the concept of Non-Free Packages please (i.e.
> Pine
> etc).
Please read Debian's Social Contract at
http://www.debian.org/social_contract.html
Included on that page y
Could someone please explain the concept of Non-Free Packages please (i.e.
Pine
etc).
These are well explained at http://www.debian.org/social_contract.html
It is just that I don't understand why other distributions can include them
in
there official releases, where as debai
Hello all,
Could someone please explain the concept of Non-Free Packages please (i.e. Pine
etc).
It is just that I don't understand why other distributions can include them in
there official releases, where as debain can not.
Also on another note, does anyone knoe if there is a graphical
Volker Jahns hat gesagt: // Volker Jahns wrote:
> I wonder:
> is there anybody who sells Debian with the non-free packages?
>
> Volker
J.F. Lehmanns Bookstore in germany is making a Debian 2-CD-Set with a lot of
non-free, non-us and local packages inside. At just DM 19.80 it'
I wonder:
is there anybody who sells Debian with the non-free packages?
Volker
--
---
Dr. Volker Jahns Tel 089/356 386 14
science+computingFAX 089/356 386 37
Taunusstraße 36
D-80807 München Email
Hello, thanks for reading.
After installing Debian I tried to install some non-free and contrib
packages with no success. The packages show up in the dselect program,
I select them for installation and press ENTER to install. No errors, no
warnings, it seems everything went fine but the package
: BTW, should I go hunting for a Pine debian package or just go and compile
: it myself? I couldn't find it on my cdrom with Debian 1.1.4... :/
: Is it a licensing problem or finding a maintainer problem?
Its a licensing problem. The debian packages are in the non-free section on
ftp.debian.org or
46 matches
Mail list logo
