When trying to mount nfs shares that are located on different BSD's from
Debian Sarge, I get the mentioned error and the following:
portmap: server localhost not responding, timed out
RPC: failed to contact portmap (errno -5).
I've since had to set 'noauto' as an option for the nfs share in fstab
Hello,
I have Debian Sarge installed on 4 servers. All installations are
up-to-date (i.e. "apt-get update && apt-get upgrade"is run
frequently).
3 installation works perfectly. One give me repeated warning with :
Nov 25 19:49:26 localhost kernel: nfs warning: mount version old
es in /etc/fstab like the following:
septictank:/wrk/mp3 /nfs/mp3 nfs 0 0
Where "septictank" is the name of the OpenBSD system. When my system
boots, these shares are not mounted. Doing a "dmesg" I noticed the
following line:
nfs warning: mount version older than kernel
However, I
From: Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
>
> the version in 2.2.r2 is the wrong version. They updated the kernel
in r2
> without putting in a new mount package. Trust me, I maintained the
mount
> package at the time.
>
Ye-haw! I'll drink to that :-)
Thanks for the quick response Sean
On 26-Feb-2001 Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> From: Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
>> > Is there some file I can touch and make this go away?
>> >
>>
>> no it is hardcoded in the code. If you simply can not survive with
> the
>> message, grab the util-linux source from woody and compile
From: Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Is there some file I can touch and make this go away?
> >
>
> no it is hardcoded in the code. If you simply can not survive with
the
> message, grab the util-linux source from woody and compile it on your
box.
>
So why hasn't it been complaini
>
> Is there some file I can touch and make this go away?
>
no it is hardcoded in the code. If you simply can not survive with the
message, grab the util-linux source from woody and compile it on your box.
Hi - I'm getting this pesky warning each time I use autofs now . .
"nfs warning: mount version older than kernel"
. . and it's really starting to annoy me, as I know that it's not true
(well, it wasn't complaining yesterday!)
Here's /proc/version:
Linux ve
8 matches
Mail list logo
