On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 02:53:51PM -0400, Eben King wrote:
> I have this machine "alexandria". It mounts a directory from the nas
> via NFS. When I export a parent directory on alexandria, the mount
> point appears empty, even though you can ssh to it and see everything
>
debian-u...@howorth.org.uk (HE12025-03-20):
> It's not a workaround. It's expected behaviour. You told the NAS to
> share some of its contents with alexandria. That's what it's doing. Why
> would you expect it to respond to a random request from some other
> computer?
That is not what it is doing.
On 3/20/25 13:36, 🦓 wrote:
Eben King :
NAS:/nfs/Movies is mounted on alexandria by NFS as /files/movies. Alex
exports /files by NFS. My computer mounts alexandria:/files and sees
/files/movies/ as empty.
Why don't you
mount alexandria:/files /files &&
mount nas:/nfs/
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:09:48PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de (HE12025-03-20):
> > Sorry if that came across as rude.
>
> Do not be: not reading before replying at least to see if what one is
> about to reply has already been addressed and therefore wasting
> everybody's time
to...@tuxteam.de (HE12025-03-20):
> Sorry if that came across as rude.
Do not be: not reading before replying at least to see if what one is
about to reply has already been addressed and therefore wasting
everybody's time is way ruder than your message might seem.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 05:59:34PM +, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> wrote:
[...]
> > Besides, we already know NFS can do that (with caveats). I wonder
> > whether people read the other postings in the threads they reply
> > to :)
>
> I certainly don'
; behalf of client and not on its own behalf.
> >
> > > Alternatively, why would you expect alexandria to share
> > > content that doesn't belong to it?
> >
> > There are many scenarios where it is useful, you just have to
> > exercise your ima
Eben King :
> NAS:/nfs/Movies is mounted on alexandria by NFS as /files/movies. Alex
> exports /files by NFS. My computer mounts alexandria:/files and sees
> /files/movies/ as empty.
>
Why don't you
mount alexandria:/files /files &&
mount nas:/nfs/Movies /files/mov
On 3/20/25 01:43, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 01:29:39AM -0400, Eben King wrote:
On 3/19/25 16:19, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 02:53:51PM -0400, Eben King wrote:
I have this machine "alexandria". It mounts a directory from the nas
via NF
> Exporting a nfs mounted location is possible via nfs-ganesha
Oh nice! Looks like this is a similar tool to unfs3, just more recent
and still actively developed.
Thanks,
Stefan
> Alternatively, why would you expect alexandria to share
> > content that doesn't belong to it?
>
> There are many scenarios where it is useful, you just have to exercise
> your imagination.
Agreed.
Besides, we already know NFS can do that (with caveats). I wonder
whether
Eben King wrote:
> On 3/19/25 15:05, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 14:53:51 -0400, Eben King wrote:
> >> I have this machine "alexandria". It mounts a directory from the
> >> nas via NFS. When I export a parent directory on alexandri
Eben King writes:
> I have this machine "alexandria". It mounts a directory from the nas
> via NFS. When I export a parent directory on alexandria, the mount
> point appears empty, even though you can ssh to it and see everything
> there that should be. How do I get it
AFAIK,
Exporting a nfs mounted location is possible via nfs-ganesha
An template config will be like
Ganesha.conf:
EXPORT
{
Export_ID = 1;
Path = "/mnt/nfs_mount";
Pseudo = "/re_export";
Access_Type = RW;
Protocols = 4;
Transports = TCP;
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 01:29:39AM -0400, Eben King wrote:
>
>
> On 3/19/25 16:19, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 02:53:51PM -0400, Eben King wrote:
> > > I have this machine "alexandria". It mounts a directory from the nas
> > >
On 3/19/25 16:19, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 02:53:51PM -0400, Eben King wrote:
I have this machine "alexandria". It mounts a directory from the nas
via NFS. When I export a parent directory on alexandria, the mount
point appears empty, even though you can
> In essence, what you are asking is "how can I re-share an NFS share
> that I'm mounting as a client, to another client".
> To the best of my knowledge, this is not possible.
>
> However, what *is* possible, because I've done it, is to mount an NFS
> share an
On 3/19/25 15:05, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 14:53:51 -0400, Eben King wrote:
I have this machine "alexandria". It mounts a directory from the nas
via NFS. When I export a parent directory on alexandria, the mount
point appears empty, even though you can ssh to
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 14:53:51 -0400, Eben King wrote:
> I have this machine "alexandria". It mounts a directory from the nas
> via NFS. When I export a parent directory on alexandria, the mount
> point appears empty, even though you can ssh to it and see everything
>
I have this machine "alexandria". It mounts a directory from the nas
via NFS. When I export a parent directory on alexandria, the mount
point appears empty, even though you can ssh to it and see everything
there that should be. How do I get it to share the contents of that mount?
Hello,
For a migration project of nfs-server, I create a new server.
I have mounting new share to the mounting points of the old server to keep the
sharing.
For some shares, on the clients, I have some "permission denied" when I want
use the share.
When I ask a status of the servi
Carlos Llamas wrote:
> I made a PHP script which locks a specific file in a NFS directory, measuring
> every step involved. Then exported the results to CSV and graphed it on ELK
> because I am more familiar with it.
Thanks for the additional details. It sounds like you have a
reproduc
Carlos Llamas wrote:
> When this happens, apache2 processes on a backend VM (NFS client
> machine) wait in state D for a long time (I was only able to trace a
> file, and lasted 90s until file unlocked).
It sounds like the process is trying to unlock a file, and the system
call han
Hello,
We are facing this problem too with 3 backend VMs and a NFS VM.
Both servers are Google Cloud Compute Engine instances with plenty of CPU
and RAM. We don't see any correlation with high CPU or RAM usage whenever
this happens on any machine. When this happens, apache2 processes
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:48:09 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
Hello Gary,
>Yes but: both gdb and nfs-client installed fine. Moreover, the
>nfs-client doesn't appear to be a dependency of any of the massive load
>of files updated lately. The gdb package however is but for some
This
xception, however; deborphan
has bee removed from testing and, as things stand, it looks like it
might be permanent - I fully understand why, but I shall mourn its
passing, as I find it to be quite handy for weeding out cruft.
Yes but: both gdb and nfs-client installed fine. Moreover, the
nfs-clie
ed this down
> to a lack of nfs software on my workstation. Reinstalling nfs-client
> fixed this.
>
> I guess I need to pay closer attention to what autoremove tells me it's
> going to remove, but I'm confused as to why it would remove nfs-client &
> related pack
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:51:01 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
Hello Gary,
>Not looking for a solution. Just reporting a spate of oddities I've
>encountered lately.
As Erwan says, this is 'normal'. Especially ATM due to the t64
transition.
As you've found out, paying attention to removals is a Good Ide
my file server shares. I eventually traced this down to
> a lack of nfs software on my workstation. Reinstalling nfs-client fixed
> this.
>
> I guess I need to pay closer attention to what autoremove tells me it's
> going to remove, but I'm confused as to why it would
I'm running Trixie on an AMD64 system.
Yesterday after doing my usual morning full-upgrade, I rebooted because
there were a lot of Plasma-related updates. When I logged in, I found I
wasn't connected to my file server shares. I eventually traced this down
to a lack of nfs soft
Hi
We recently migrated to new nfs server running on debian 12 bookworm
On the client Apache processes started randomly switching to D state,
In apache fluststatus Process 93661 a mis 10786 sec
=
4-1 93661 1598/ W 15.92 10786 0 2367404 0.0 71.45 142.44 172.20.1.47 http/1.1
On Sat, 2024-03-09 at 13:54 +0100, hw wrote:
>
> NFS can be hard on network card drivers
> IPv6 may be faster than IPv4
> the network cable might suck
> the switch might suck or block stuff
As iperf and other network protocols were confirmed to be fast by the
OP it is very unlike
On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:13 +0100, Stefan K wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I hope someone can help me with my problem.
> Our NFS performance ist very bad, like ~20MB/s, mountoption looks like that:
Reading or writing, or both?
Try testing with files on a different volume.
> rw,relatim
nc"?
> > this could be a solution, but I want to understand why is it so slow and
> > fix that
>
> It's inherent in how sync works. Over-the-wire calls are expensive.
> NFS implementations try to get acceptable performance by extensive
> caching, using asynchronous oper
t to understand why is it so slow and fix
> that
It's inherent in how sync works. Over-the-wire calls are expensive.
NFS implementations try to get acceptable performance by extensive
caching, using asynchronous operations when possible, and by issuing a
smaller number of large RPCs (rath
Stefan K wrote:
> > Run the database on the machine that stores the files and perform
> > database access remotely over the net instead. ?
>
> yes, but this doesn't resolve the performance issue with nfs
But it removes your issue that forces you to use the sync option.
> Run the database on the machine that stores the files and perform
> database access remotely over the net instead. ?
yes, but this doesn't resolve the performance issue with nfs
> Can you partition the files into 2 different shares? Put the database
> files in one share and access them using "sync", and put the rest of the
> files in a different share, with no "sync"?
this could be a solution, but I want to understand why is it so slow and fix
that
Stefan K wrote:
> > You could try removing the "sync" option, just as an experiment, to
> > see how much it is contributing to the slowdown.
>
> If I don't use sync I got around 300MB/s (tested with 600MB-file) ..
> that's ok (far from great), but si
> You could try removing the "sync" option, just as an experiment, to see
> how much it is contributing to the slowdown.
If I don't use sync I got around 300MB/s (tested with 600MB-file) .. that's ok
(far from great), but since there are database files on the nfs i
0 0
0 0 0 0
Server file handle cache:
lookup anon ncachedir ncachenondir stale
0 0 0 0 0
Server nfs v4:
null compound
2 0% 509976662 99%
Server nfs v4 operations:
op0-unused op1
On 2024-03-07, Stefan K wrote:
> I hope someone can help me with my problem.
> Our NFS performance ist very bad, like ~20MB/s, mountoption looks like that:
> rw,relatime,sync,vers=4.2,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,local_lock=none
Wha
Stefan K wrote:
> 'sync'-mountoption is important (more or less), but it should still be
> much faster than 20MB/s
I don't know if "sync" could be entirely responsible for such a
slowdown, but it's likely at least contributing, particularly if the
application is doing small I/Os at the system cal
Hi Ralph,
I just tested it with scp and I got 262MB/s
So it's not a network issue, just a NFS issue, somehow.
best regards
Stefan
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 07. März 2024 um 11:22 Uhr
> Von: "Ralph Aichinger"
> An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: very poor
On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:13 +0100, Stefan K wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I hope someone can help me with my problem.
> Our NFS performance ist very bad, like ~20MB/s, mountoption looks
> like that:
Are both sides agreeing on MTU (using Jumbo frames or not)?
Have you tested the net
Hello guys,
I hope someone can help me with my problem.
Our NFS performance ist very bad, like ~20MB/s, mountoption looks like that:
rw,relatime,sync,vers=4.2,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,local_lock=none
The NFS server (debian 12) is a ZFS
Very unimpressed with the so called "fix" for #842145 of just blocking
running the script on nfs mount rather than fixing the script to work
properly with nfs.
The problem with the script is that it does not ignore the .nfs*
files. An explanation of these files is available he
ds (and later a hub),
> I still ran /usr over NFS.
You can still do it if you want, as long as your initramfs mounts
/usr from nfs, which I'm pretty sure it will without any difficulty
if you have the correct entry in /etc/fstab. I don't think anything
has gone out of its way to break
Pocket writes:
[...]
> I am in the process of re-configuring NFS for V4 only.
Could it be there is some misunderstanding?
IPV4 and IPV6 are quite different concepts from NFSv4: I think this
works either on IPV4 and IPV6.
--
Ciao
leandro
Hello,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 07:04:21AM -0500, Pocket wrote:
> I have this in the exports, ipv4 works
>
> /srv/Multimedia 192.168.1.0/24(rw,no_root_squash,subtree_check)
> /srv/Other 192.168.1.0/24(rw,no_root_squash,subtree_check)
> #/home 2002:474f:e945:0:0:0:0:0/64(rw,no_root_squash,subtree_c
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 09:54:54AM +, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> plus FWIW...
>
> https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/821-1453/ipv6-ref-71.html
>
> "NFS software and Remote Procedure Call (RPC) software support IPv6 in a
> seamless manner. Existing comma
On 1/5/24 04:54, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Marco Moock wrote:
Am 04.01.2024 um 18:19:57 Uhr schrieb Pocket:
Where can I find information on how to configure NFS to use ipv6
addresses both server and client.
Does IPv6 work basically on your machine, including name resolution?
Does
On 1/5/24 03:35, Marco Moock wrote:
Am 04.01.2024 um 18:19:57 Uhr schrieb Pocket:
Where can I find information on how to configure NFS to use ipv6
addresses both server and client.
Does IPv6 work basically on your machine, including name resolution?
Yes I have bind running and ssh to the
Marco Moock wrote:
> Am 04.01.2024 um 18:19:57 Uhr schrieb Pocket:
>
> > Where can I find information on how to configure NFS to use ipv6
> > addresses both server and client.
>
> Does IPv6 work basically on your machine, including name resolution?
>
> Does it
Am 04.01.2024 um 18:19:57 Uhr schrieb Pocket:
> Where can I find information on how to configure NFS to use ipv6
> addresses both server and client.
Does IPv6 work basically on your machine, including name resolution?
Does it work if you enter the address directly?
https://ipv6.ne
Where can I find information on how to configure NFS to use ipv6
addresses both server and client.
I haven't found any good information on how to do that and what I did
find was extremely sparce.
I have NFS mounts working using ipv4 and want to change that to ipv6
--
Hindi madal
On 10/5/23 05:01, Steve Matzura wrote:
On 10/4/2023 2:32 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 10/4/23 05:03, Steve Matzura wrote:
On 10/3/2023 6:06 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 10/3/23 12:03, Steve Matzura wrote:
I gave up on the NFS business and went back to good old buggy
but reliable SAMBA
On 10/4/23 05:03, Steve Matzura wrote:
On 10/3/2023 6:06 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 10/3/23 12:03, Steve Matzura wrote:
I gave up on the NFS business and went back to good old buggy
but reliable SAMBA (LOL), ...
I have attempted to document the current state of Samba on my
SOHO, below
On 10/3/23 12:03, Steve Matzura wrote:
I gave up on the NFS business and went back to good old buggy but
reliable SAMBA (LOL), which is what I was using when I was on Debian 8,
and which worked fine. Except for one thing, everything's great.
In /etc/fstab, I have:
//192.168.1.156/Bi
On 03/10/2023 20:03, Steve Matzura wrote:
I gave up on the NFS business
Why?
and went back to good old buggy but reliable SAMBA (LOL)
:o
Sorry but I think you created bigger problem that you already had. NFS
works great, I've been using it for years and it never failed me. I
cannot
I gave up on the NFS business and went back to good old buggy but
reliable SAMBA (LOL), which is what I was using when I was on Debian 8,
and which worked fine. Except for one thing, everything's great.
In /etc/fstab, I have:
//192.168.1.156/BigVol1 /mnt/bigvol1 civs
vers=2.0,creden
and deleted/merged the
offending files.
Note that I ran usrmerge on the individual hosts themselves, on NFS
root. Although usrmerge complained that this won't work, it somehow
did. Systems rebooted, all came up fine, no broken packages and the
programs are working.
Thanks for all the support. Case solved.
Marco
Steve Matzura wrote:
> mount /mnt/bigvol1/dir-1 /home/steve/dir-1 -o bind,ro
In addition to what others have observed it might be worth mentioning
that the -v option to mount (i.e. verbose) often gives more information
about what's going on.
On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 02:43:16PM -0400, Steve Matzura wrote:
As Charles points out, this looks rather like CIFS, not NFS:
> # NAS box:
> //192.168.1.156/BigVol1 /mnt/bigvol1 cifs
> _netdev,username=,password=,ro 0 0
If Charles's (an
the cause of
the problem.
If the Synology NAS supports NFS, that might be a better approach in the long
run, though.
Regards,
Tom Dial
Research into this problem made me try similar techniques after having
installed nfs-utils. I got bogged down by a required procedure entailing
exportation of N
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 14:43:16 -0400
Steve Matzura wrote:
> # NAS box:
> //192.168.1.156/BigVol1 /mnt/bigvol1 cifs
> _netdev,username=,password=,ro 0 0
Possibly part of the problem is that this is a CIFS (Samba) mount, not
an NFS mount.
Is samba installed?
If you try to mount t
thing to which those directories can bind, so even if those mount
commands are correct, I would never know until bigvol1 mounts correctly
and content appears in at least 'ls -ld /mnt/bigvol1'.
Research into this problem made me try similar techniques after having
installed nfs-utils. I
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 17:55:06 +
Andy Smith wrote:
> I haven't followed this thread closely, but is my understanding
> correct:
>
> - You have a FreeBSD NFS server with an export that is a root
> filesystem of a Debian 11 install shared by multiple clients
Almost. I
testing, for someone who was familiar with FreeBSD's
> > userland
>
> I'm not going down that route.
I haven't followed this thread closely, but is my understanding
correct:
- You have a FreeBSD NFS server with an export that is a root
filesystem of a Debian 11 instal
> So the file in /lib appears to be newer. So what to do? Can I delete
> the one in /usr/lib ?
Yes.
Stefan
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 16:54:27 -0400
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Still going on with this?
I am.
> Have you actually looked at those two files:
>
> /lib/udev/rules.d/60-libsane1.rules and
> /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-libsane1.rules
>
> to see if they're identical or not and to see if you might ha
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 16:43:09 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> The heart of the convert-usrmerge perl script is pretty
> reasonable. However:
>
> […]
>
> Similarly, there are calls to stat and du which probably have
> some incompatibilities.
>
> The effect of running this would be fairly safe, but als
>> I don't know whether TrueNAS enabled that.
>
> No it does not. I just confirmed, the only choices are raw disk
> access (ZVOL), NFS and Samba.
>
> However, usrmerge is a perl script. Can I run it on the server
> (after chroot'ing) in a jail (under FreeBSD)? Or does this mess
> things up? Just a thought.
>
> Marco
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 15:01:50 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Is this a mission-critical server?
I'd say so, yes. It's not one single server. It's *all*
workstations.
> i.e. will screwing it up for a day cause other people to be upset
Yes, because no one can use their computer.
> or you to lose mone
hoices are raw disk
access (ZVOL), NFS and Samba.
However, usrmerge is a perl script. Can I run it on the server
(after chroot'ing) in a jail (under FreeBSD)? Or does this mess
things up? Just a thought.
Marco
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 11:00:17 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> What VM software are you using
bhyve
…which I know very little about. It's supported on the server, I've
tried it, set up a VM, it works. But the server is mainly serving
NFS shares to various clients.
> and what's
Marco wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2023 12:26:38 -0400
> Dan Ritter wrote:
> > * have the VM mount the filesystem directly
>
> How? I can only attach devices (=whole disks) to the VM or mount the
> FS via NFS. I can't attach it as a device because it's not a device,
>
On Fri, 8 Sep 2023 12:26:38 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Can you start a temporary VM directly on the server?
I just checked. I can, yes.
> If so, you can
> * stop your remote Debian machine
Ok, no problem.
> * run a Debian rescue image in the VM on the NFS server
No problem.
>
I'll have to check the following days.
>
> > If so, you can
> > * stop your remote Debian machine
> > * run a Debian rescue image in the VM on the NFS server
> > * have the VM mount the filesystem directly
> > * chroot, run usrmerge
> > * unmount
>
>
> > back onto the server. Is there a recommended procedure or
> > documentation available?
>
> Can you start a temporary VM directly on the server?
I might actually. I'll have to check the following days.
> If so, you can
> * stop your remote Debian machine
> * ru
> root@foobar:~# /usr/lib/usrmerge/convert-usrmerge
>
> FATAL ERROR:
> Both /lib/udev/rules.d/60-libsane1.rules and
> /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-libsane1.rules exist.
The problem is that "usrmerge" needs to unify those two and doesn't
know how. So you need to do it by hand.
E.g. get rid of
On Fri, 8 Sep 2023 16:55:23 +0200
zithro wrote:
> On 08 Sep 2023 12:54, Marco wrote:
> >Warning: NFS detected, /usr/lib/usrmerge/convert-usrmerge will
> > not be run automatically. See #842145 for details.
>
> Read :
> - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
On 08 Sep 2023 12:54, Marco wrote:
Warning: NFS detected, /usr/lib/usrmerge/convert-usrmerge will not be run
automatically. See #842145 for details.
Read :
- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842145
- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039522
The solution
Hi,
I'm in the process of upgrading my Debian stable hosts and run into
a problem with usrmerge:
Setting up usrmerge (35) ...
Warning: NFS detected, /usr/lib/usrmerge/convert-usrmerge will not be run
automatically. See #842145 for details.
E: usrmerge failed.
dpkg: error proce
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 05:44:59PM +0100, piorunz wrote:
> Edit /etc/nfs.conf file:
> [nfsd]
> udp=y
>
> then:
> sudo systemctl restart nfs-server
Yes, that fixed my NFS problem.
Thank you very much
--
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
On 29/07/2023 16:00, Matthias Scheler wrote:
Hello,
after upgrading one of my systems from Debian 11 to 12 the kernel NFS server
doesn't seem to accept NFS requests over UDP on port 2049 anymore:
>rpcinfo -p | grep nfs
133 tcp 2
Hello,
after upgrading one of my systems from Debian 11 to 12 the kernel NFS server
doesn't seem to accept NFS requests over UDP on port 2049 anymore:
>rpcinfo -p | grep nfs
133 tcp 2049 nfs
134 tcp 2049 nfs
mount a NFS
filesystem as filesystem root. I even asked Chatgpt, and it replied with its
usual hallucinations, unable to provide real links to source of information.
This is what my TFTP root currently looks like:
├── grub
│ └── grub.cfg
├── grubnetx64.efi
├── initrd.img (Generic Debian Te
Le lundi 26 décembre 2022, 16:51:56 CET Jean-François Bachelet a écrit :
> Hello ^^)
>
> Le 26/12/2022 à 16:05, Olivier Back my spare a écrit :
> > Bonjour
> >
> > Est-il possible de faire un NAS serveur de fichier SMB NFS SFTP + LDAP
> > avec un Debian?
> >
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 12:04:56PM +0100, tony wrote:
> I can successfully do (pls ignore spurious line break):
>
> mount -t nfs -o _netdev tony-fr:/mnt/sharedfolder
> /mnt/sharedfolder_client
>
> but the user id is incorrect.
What do you mean, "the user id"? A
Hi,
I need to mount a directory from a debian 11 server to a debian 10 client.
I can successfully do (pls ignore spurious line break):
mount -t nfs -o _netdev tony-fr:/mnt/sharedfolder
/mnt/sharedfolder_client
but the user id is incorrect. If I now try:
mount -t nfs -o _netdev,uid=1002 tony
Hi,
A suggestion: we've had issues in the past, where on NFS root the issue
was that setting "Linux Capabilities" (setcap) fails, because NFS does
not support the extended attributes to store them.
Perhaps that is your issue as well?
MJ
Op 16-08-2022 om 21:58 schreef Lie
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 06:21:21PM -0700, Wylie wrote:
>
> i am getting this error ... on a fresh install of nfs-kernel-server
>
> Â mount.nfs: access denied by server while mounting
> 192.168.42.194:/ShareName
>
> i'm not having this issue on other machines installed
i am getting this error ... on a fresh install of nfs-kernel-server
 mount.nfs: access denied by server while mounting
192.168.42.194:/ShareName
i'm not having this issue on other machines installed previously
i've tried re-installing Debian and nfs several times
Wylie!
d is trying to get sysusers
up "too early", before the root file system is pivoted-in?
Feeding my search engine with "NFS root" and +systemd turns up a
bunch of interesting suggestions (e.g. network has to be up before
NFS has to be mounted, etc:).
Good luck... and tell us what it was ;-)
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 03:58:30PM -0400, Lie Rock wrote:
> So how is the process "create system users" performed when Linux/Debian
> starts? What can be contributing to this error?
unicorn:~$ grep -ri 'create system users' /lib/systemd
/lib/systemd/system/systemd-sysusers.service:Description=Crea
Hi,
I'm trying to bring up the Debian 10 root file system on an ARM SoC board.
When the rootfs was in an SD card the board worked well. When I put the
rootfs on an NFS server and tried to boot the board through NFS mount, it
reported error through serial port:
[FAILED] Failed to start C
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> Are you sure you're actually using NFSv4? (check 'mount | grep nfs').
Yes I'm sure. It's all host on path type nfs4 and in options also
vers=4.2.
Also the bog standard auto.net these days has code to mount using NFSv4.
> In my experie
On Mi, 02 feb 22, 13:49:38, Anssi Saari wrote:
> Greg Wooledge writes:
>
> > I'm unclear on how NFS v4 works. Everything I've read about it in the
> > past says that you have to set up a user mapping, which is shared by
> > the client and the server. And th
ith user being optional if you want the current
> user. You can add bookmarks in your filemanager for the paths you use
> frequently.
>
> I use this for quick access for copying and editing files on other
> machines. For proper automated backup and bulk storage I use NFS o
1 - 100 of 2951 matches
Mail list logo
