Re: new ATI graphics boards

1999-04-16 Thread Raymond A. Ingles
On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Pavel Mores wrote: > On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Jeff Noxon wrote: > > > You might be better off avoiding ATI graphics boards under Linux. ATI is > > not cooperative with the developer community and drivers tend to take a > > while to get written & stabilize. [...] > It's too bad

Re: new ATI graphics boards

1999-04-16 Thread Pavel Mores
On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Jeff Noxon wrote: > You might be better off avoiding ATI graphics boards under Linux. ATI is > not cooperative with the developer community and drivers tend to take a > while to get written & stabilize. I've suffered through problems with > several generations of Mach64 card

Re: new ATI graphics boards

1999-04-16 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Stephan Engelke wrote: > I am thinking of upgrading my computer's graphics board to > either one of the two new ATI cards: ATI Rage Magnum or ATI Rage Fury. > Now I am wondering if anyone has any experience with either one of > these two boards? How do they perform under X11

Re: new ATI graphics boards

1999-04-16 Thread Jeff Noxon
You might be better off avoiding ATI graphics boards under Linux. ATI is not cooperative with the developer community and drivers tend to take a while to get written & stabilize. I've suffered through problems with several generations of Mach64 cards. Maybe the new boards work great already, but

new ATI graphics boards

1999-04-16 Thread Stephan Engelke
Hi everyone, I am thinking of upgrading my computer's graphics board to either one of the two new ATI cards: ATI Rage Magnum or ATI Rage Fury. I am not sure what the difference between these two cards is (my dealer didn't either) - except for the price. Now I am wondering if anyone has any exper