Re: mutt: slow reading d-u

2007-05-08 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 08:59:32PM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote: > >> Are you using maildir (opposed to mailbox)? If you keep a lot of > >> content around consider using ext3 with dir_index enabled. Do you have > > > > That's on > > Did you enable it yourself or did the installer do it for you?

Re: mutt: slow reading d-u

2007-05-08 Thread Jochen Schulz
Andrei Popescu: > On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:23:05AM -0400, Allan Wind wrote: >> >> Are you using maildir (opposed to mailbox)? If you keep a lot of >> content around consider using ext3 with dir_index enabled. Do you have > > That's on Did you enable it yourself or did the installer do it for

Re: mutt: slow reading d-u

2007-05-08 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:23:05AM -0400, Allan Wind wrote: > On 2007-05-08T11:49:00+0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > 3. I can't seem to get mutt to cache better. On reading the d-u folder > > it takes a bit much for my taste (claws was faster). Any pointers? Of > > course I STFW and RTFM. > > Are

mutt: slow reading d-u

2007-05-08 Thread Allan Wind
On 2007-05-08T11:49:00+0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > 3. I can't seem to get mutt to cache better. On reading the d-u folder > it takes a bit much for my taste (claws was faster). Any pointers? Of > course I STFW and RTFM. Are you using maildir (opposed to mailbox)? If you keep a lot of content ar