Re: Re (3): mp3 to speex

2012-08-27 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 10:47:11 -0700, peasthope wrote: > From: Camaleon > Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:12:17 + (UTC) >> You mean "--demuxdump-file" is for that? :-? > > That was my speculation. From the 305671 kiB > http://wiki.videolan.org/VLC_command-line_help how might the the > destination b

Re (3): mp3 to speex

2012-08-26 Thread peasthope
From: Camaleon Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 17:12:17 + (UTC) > You mean "--demuxdump-file" is for that? :-? That was my speculation. From the 305671 kiB http://wiki.videolan.org/VLC_command-line_help how might the the destination be specified? Anything as straightforward as the good old "d

Re: Re (2): mp3 to speex

2012-08-26 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 08:59:39 -0700, peasthope wrote: > From: Camaleon > Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:32:36 + (UTC) >> ... nothing about mp3 as input source ... > > Hence the attempt at vlc converting mp3 to pcm before piping to speex. (...) You mean "--demuxdump-file" is for that? :-? *** F

Re (2): mp3 to speex

2012-08-26 Thread peasthope
From: Kelly Clowers Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:51:56 -0700 > ... convert to wav ... Isn't PCM a simpler format? That is what I intended vlc to convert the mp3 into. > I always use mplayer. Will have a look. For me, the syntax and semantics of the vlc command aren't particularly fathomabl

Re (2): mp3 to speex

2012-08-26 Thread peasthope
From: Camaleon Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:32:36 + (UTC) > ... nothing about mp3 as input source ... Hence the attempt at vlc converting mp3 to pcm before piping to speex. > ... first have to convert the stream into PCM ... Exactly what was attempted. > I would look at "sox" as it see

Re: mp3 to speex

2012-08-24 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:01 AM, wrote: > Can speex be used to represent a recording which is mostly voice > but has some non-voice sound? Yes, it will be less than ideal for those sounds, but as long as it is not a majority of the file, it shouldn't be too bad. > In this experiment the intenti

Re: mp3 to speex

2012-08-24 Thread Camaleón
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:01:18 -0800, peasthope wrote: > Can speex be used to represent a recording which is mostly voice but has > some non-voice sound? I don't see why not :-? > In this experiment the intention is to retrieve the stream by http, send > PCM to stdout, pipe that to speexenc and s

mp3 to speex

2012-08-24 Thread peasthope
Can speex be used to represent a recording which is mostly voice but has some non-voice sound? In this experiment the intention is to retrieve the stream by http, send PCM to stdout, pipe that to speexenc and save as a *.spx file. peter@dalton:~$ vlc --demuxdump-file=- \ http://www.cbc.ca/qui