are you running slink ?
because of a bug in glibc 2.0.x the last 8 or 9 milestone builds of
mozilla do not run on glibc 2.0.x, they require 2.1.
nate
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Michael Soulier wrote:
msouli >
msouli >So I upgraded mozilla to M-17, and all it does is segfault. Has
msouli >any
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> Remove ~/.mozilla.
>
> I've filed a bug report on this:
> http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=69377
Cool. After it started working, so far the only bug I've noticed
is that editing the URL line directly is extremely bu
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 10:12:46PM -0400, Michael Soulier wrote:
>
> So I upgraded mozilla to M-17, and all it does is segfault. Has
> anyone had any luck with this package?
Remove ~/.mozilla.
I've filed a bug report on this:
http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=69377
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 11:13:14PM -0400, Michael Soulier wrote:
> Is there a way to do that via apt-get, or are we talking tarballs
> and patch? CVS?
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/
--
// André
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Jack Morgan wrote:
> I also downloaded it -> installed no problem. But was really slow on ly
> laptop. (Only 32MB RAM ;-(
> Can you give more details as to what went wrong
Not really. I ran it, it segfaulted, I scratched my head.
Ok, I blasted the ~/.mozilla
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Andr? Dahlqvist wrote:
> You mentioned "upgraded", does that mean you have been running mozilla
> before? If you have, you should remove your ~/.mozilla directory, or at
> least the ~/.mozilla/registry file. You should really try out the
> nightly builds though, they kick ass.
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Friday, 18 August 2000 at 22:12, Michael Soulier wrote:
> >
> > So I upgraded mozilla to M-17, and all it does is segfault. Has
> > anyone had any luck with this package?
>
> IWFM. Did you remove your old .mozilla directory before starting?
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Michael Soulier wrote:
> So I upgraded mozilla to M-17, and all it does is segfault. Has
>anyone had any luck with this package?
> Mike
I also downloaded it -> installed no problem. But was really slow on ly
laptop. (Only 32MB RAM ;-(
Can you give more details as t
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 10:12:46PM -0400, Michael Soulier wrote:
> So I upgraded mozilla to M-17, and all it does is segfault. Has
> anyone had any luck with this package?
You mentioned "upgraded", does that mean you have been running mozilla
before? If you have, you should remove your ~/.mozilla
On Friday, 18 August 2000 at 22:12, Michael Soulier wrote:
>
> So I upgraded mozilla to M-17, and all it does is segfault. Has
> anyone had any luck with this package?
IWFM. Did you remove your old .mozilla directory before starting?
--
Don't make Godzilla mad!
pgpTIVvgumkPN.pgp
Descrip
runs okay for me too. I even installed Galeon.
--
Andrew
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000 20:19:40 -0600 (MDT), Rick Macdonald said:
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Michael Soulier wrote:
>
> >So I upgraded mozilla to M-17, and all it does is segfault. Has
> > anyone had any luck with this package?
>
> I
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Michael Soulier wrote:
> So I upgraded mozilla to M-17, and all it does is segfault. Has
> anyone had any luck with this package?
I ran it for a few minutes only while I was downloading the nightly
snapshot. This was a week ago and it seem to run OK.
...RickM...
So I upgraded mozilla to M-17, and all it does is segfault. Has
anyone had any luck with this package?
Mike
"To listen to the words of the learned, and to instill into others the
lessons of science, is better than religious exercises."
-- Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)
13 matches
Mail list logo
