tom arnall wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008 17:49, Marty wrote:
tom arnall wrote:
> besides my home directory, what else should i think about backing up?
I would back up etc as well.
Come to think of it, I might also grab var, and maybe run dpkg-query and save
the output, to make reinstallio
On Sunday 20 January 2008 17:49, Marty wrote:
> tom arnall wrote:
> > besides my home directory, what else should i think about backing up?
>
> I would back up etc as well.
>
> > what would be the advantage of 'rsync'?
>
> It makes perfect copies of directory trees.
is there a problem with 'cp -R'
tom arnall wrote:
besides my home directory, what else should i think about backing up?
I would back up etc as well.
what would be the advantage of 'rsync'?
It makes perfect copies of directory trees.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Sunday 20 January 2008 15:36, Marty wrote:
> tom arnall wrote:
> > On Sunday 20 January 2008 14:32, Marty wrote:
> >> The simplest solution is to start with a new drive. Unplug and remove
> >> your current drive if it contains anything valuable, put it in a safe
> >> place. As the saying goes,
tom arnall wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008 14:32, Marty wrote:
The simplest solution is to start with a new drive. Unplug and remove your
current drive if it contains anything valuable, put it in a safe place. As
the saying goes, when you're stuck in the hole, stop digging.
don't have a
On Sunday 20 January 2008 14:32, Marty wrote:
> tom arnall wrote:
> > When installing a new system (etch), is there any trick I need to know
> > for getting my home directory right? I have the one from old system
> > backed up. When I go to restore it on the new system, I assume the
> > installer
tom arnall wrote:
When installing a new system (etch), is there any trick I need to know for
getting my home directory right? I have the one from old system backed up.
When I go to restore it on the new system, I assume the installer will have
put some kind of home directory on the new system u
When installing a new system (etch), is there any trick I need to know for
getting my home directory right? I have the one from old system backed up.
When I go to restore it on the new system, I assume the installer will have
put some kind of home directory on the new system under my username.
tom arnall wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008 12:37, Marty wrote:
tom arnall wrote:
> Marty,
>
> should i be concerned about the following. i did this without pointing
> sources.list to the new repository.
Well, fix that. :-)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
It's a typical casc
On Sunday 20 January 2008 12:37, Marty wrote:
> tom arnall wrote:
> > Marty,
> >
> > should i be concerned about the following. i did this without pointing
> > sources.list to the new repository.
>
> Well, fix that. :-)
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
>
> It's a typical cascad
tom arnall wrote:
Marty,
should i be concerned about the following. i did this without pointing
sources.list to the new repository.
Well, fix that. :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
It's a typical cascade of errors caused by the first few individual package
dependency
Reading database ... 203060 files and directories currently installed.)
> > Preparing to replace linux-wlan-ng 0.2.5+dfsg+prism2dl-1etch1
> > (using .../linux-wlan-ng_0.2.5+dfsg+prism2dl-1etch1_i386.deb) ...
> > Unpacking replacement linux-wlan-ng ...
> > /etc/modutils/0k
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 02:46:31PM -0500, Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard
to say:
> tom arnall wrote:
>> i attempted the distr-upgrade and after i rebooted did:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r
>> 2.6.16.4
>>
>> so i did the distr-upgrade again. following is the session output. '31
>> not
cking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
(Reading database ... 203060 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace lin
age status... Done
> Retrieving bug reports... Done
> Parsing Found/Fixed information... Done
> (Reading database ... 203060 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace linux-wlan-ng 0.2.5+dfsg+prism2dl-1etch1
> (using .../linux-wlan-ng_0.2.5+dfsg+prism2dl-1etch1_i38
tom arnall wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008 11:46, Marty wrote:
tom arnall wrote:
> i attempted the distr-upgrade and after i rebooted did:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r
> 2.6.16.4
>
> so i did the distr-upgrade again. following is the session output. '31
> not fully installed or removed.' i
On Sunday 20 January 2008 11:46, Marty wrote:
> tom arnall wrote:
> > i attempted the distr-upgrade and after i rebooted did:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r
> > 2.6.16.4
> >
> > so i did the distr-upgrade again. following is the session output. '31
> > not fully installed or removed.' is whe
tom arnall wrote:
i attempted the distr-upgrade and after i rebooted did:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r
2.6.16.4
so i did the distr-upgrade again. following is the session output. '31 not
fully installed or removed.' is where it gets interesting:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get dist-upgrad
installed.)
Preparing to replace linux-wlan-ng 0.2.5+dfsg+prism2dl-1etch1
(using .../linux-wlan-ng_0.2.5+dfsg+prism2dl-1etch1_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement linux-wlan-ng ...
/etc/modutils/0keep: line 9: keep: command not found
Error while executing /etc/modutils/0keep, aborting
Note: If /etc/modu
inline.
On Sunday 20 January 2008 10:39, David Paleino wrote:
> Il giorno Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:39:19 -0800
>
> tom arnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> > David,
> >
> > hmmm. i did 'chmod -R 777 /dev' a couple of months ago, changing
> > unwittingly many (most?) permissions on the system accord
Is there actually supposed to be a 'keep' program on the system? I looked at a
full backup I did a couple of months ago and I cannot find it there.
tom arnall
arcata
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Il giorno Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:39:19 -0800
tom arnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> David,
>
> hmmm. i did 'chmod -R 777 /dev' a couple of months ago, changing unwittingly
> many (most?) permissions on the system accordingly.
Why did you do that?
> will a dist-upgrade wreck what is left of t
On Sunday 20 January 2008 10:23, David Paleino wrote:
> Il giorno Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:26:42 -0800
>
> tom arnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> > i have been doing 'apt-get upgrade' fairly regularly. is there s'thing
> > else i need to do?
>
> That's not sufficient.
>
> You should also apt-get d
Le dimanche 20 janvier 2008 à 10:31 -0800, tom arnall a écrit :
> Florian,
>
> why do you say my system is not fully etch?
>
> thanks,
>
> tom arnall
> arcata
>
>
Because you are using a 2.6.16 kernel ? :
> > system details:
> >
> > [EMAIL
Il giorno Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:26:42 -0800
tom arnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> i have been doing 'apt-get upgrade' fairly regularly. is there s'thing else i
> need to do?
That's not sufficient.
You should also apt-get dist-upgrade. Use with caution though, check what it
tries to remove
Florian,
why do you say my system is not fully etch?
thanks,
tom arnall
arcata
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ion messages:
> > > Error while executing /etc/modutils/0keep, aborting
> > Note: If /etc/modutils/0keep should not be an executable script, please
> > ensure it does not have execute permission
> > dpkg: error while cleaning up:
> > subprocess post-removal script retu
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 22:11:28 -0800, tom arnall wrote:
> i interrupted 'apt-get install linux-wlan-ng' and when i did the command
> again
> i got at the end of the installation messages:
>
> /etc/modutils/0keep: line 9: keep: command not found
> Error while e
i interrupted 'apt-get install linux-wlan-ng' and when i did the command again
i got at the end of the installation messages:
/etc/modutils/0keep: line 9: keep: command not found
Error while executing /etc/modutils/0keep, aborting
Note: If /etc/modutils/0keep should not be an executa
On Jan 01, Declan Mullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed that my system has some files that belong to the "modutils"
> package (which is used with 2.2 and 2.4 kernels), however I don't have
> that package installed. The files are "/sbin/ksyms&q
Hi All
My system is running "etch" with the latest updates and a 2.6 kernel. It
has never installed or run a 2.4 or 2.2 kernel.
I've noticed that my system has some files that belong to the "modutils"
package (which is used with 2.2 and 2.4 kernels), however I don'
Hi all,
I finally plucked up my courage and put in another hard disk and
installed 2.6.8-11-amd64-k8 which is running independently of my i386
installation. Loads of problems but perhaps the easiest is what do I do
to get my architecture into /etc/modutils/arch?
I can't install the alsa dr
en I'm using 2.6.5?
>
> > instead of
> > modules.conf
> > modutils
> > modules
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.5?
> instead of
> modules.conf
> modutils
> modules
>
--
LeVA
pgpUVM9sbnq9C.pgp
Description: signature
The root of my problem is that the Debian 2.6 kernel uses
modprobe.conf
modprobe.d
modules-2.6
instead of
modules.conf
modutils
modules
Once I figured that out, everything was easy to fix.
> You are mistaken about what is a kernel module and w
Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Please cc me in your reply.
Please do not CC me but keep replies to the mailing list.
> I am using the following modutils lines
>
> alias char-major-10-1 mousedev
> above mousedev psmouse
> alias sound-card-0 snd-intel8x0
> alias eth0 3c59x
Those see
I am using the following modutils lines
alias char-major-10-1 mousedev
above mousedev psmouse
alias sound-card-0 snd-intel8x0
alias eth0 3c59x
but they seem to be having no effect. For example,
$ modprobe eth0
FATAL: Module eth0 not found.
How can I make this work?
ii modutils 2.4.26-1
date /etc/modules.conf from /etc/
modutils/* for 2.4
Use update-modules to update /lib/modules/modprobe.conf from /etc/
modprobe.d/* for 2.6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4 kernel for a rescue boot, but I was planning to
> | > remove it eventually.
> |
> | With 2.6, update-modules uses /etc/modutils/* to form
> | /lib/modules/modprobe.conf, which is included in
> | /etc/modprobe.conf.
>
> Are you sure? I think, though I could be wrong, that the 2.
ules uses /etc/modutils/* to form
| /lib/modules/modprobe.conf, which is included in
| /etc/modprobe.conf.
Are you sure? I think, though I could be wrong, that the 2.6
update-modules uses /etc/modprobe.d/*, not /etc/modutiles. I thought
/etc/modutils is only for 2.4 (and earlier) kernels. A fai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 05:32 pm, Adam Aube wrote:
> 2.6 only - Keep both, but only maintain modprobe.d
I think that this is the answer that I was looking for. I've been trying to
clean up little things since I've updated to 2.6 and I keep wond
On 18 Feb 2004 at 16:41:36, CW Harris wrote:
> does 2.6 require both? I currently have kept both since I
> have a 2.4 kernel for a rescue boot, but I was planning to
> remove it eventually.
With 2.6, update-modules uses /etc/modutils/* to form
/lib/modules/modprobe.conf, which is in
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 05:32:40PM -0500, Adam Aube wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2004 at 15:21:48, Darin Strait wrote:
> > I don't understand why I have a modprobe.d and a modutils
> > directory.
>
> The modutils directory is for modutils (for 2.4 kernels), and
> the modpr
dprobe.d and a modutils
> directory.
The modutils directory is for modutils (for 2.4 kernels), and
the modprobe.d directory is for module-init-tools (for 2.6
kernels).
> Should I be using one or the other or both?
That depends on what kernels you use.
2.4 only - use "apt get remove --pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I understand that modules.conf is deprecated in favor of update-modules.
I don't understand why I have a modprobe.d and a modutils directory. Should I
be using one or the other or both?
Thanks,
- -d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 14:56, Frank A. Uepping wrote:
> does someone know a package for the new modutils for Woody?
Adrian Bunk has them, backports.org too
http://www.apt-get.org/search.php?query=module-init-tools&submit=&arch%5B%5D=i386&arch%5B%5D=all
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
does someone know a package for the new modutils for Woody?
/FAU
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
x27;t need to get them -- every home should have them.
The package they are in is called 'modutils', and if I'm not completely
mistaken it needs massive tampering to install Debian without getting
modutils as part of the deal.
The same with the loadable kernel modules (aka device d
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 08:01:09PM +0200, LeVA wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have noticed that when I load a module the /etc/modutils/
> files, which conatins the "post-install" lines, doesn't run.
> So when I load my emu10k1 for example, which has a /etc/modutils/emu10k
David Z Maze írta:
LeVA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have noticed that when I load a module the
/etc/modutils/ files, which conatins the "post-install"
lines, doesn't run.
So when I load my emu10k1 for example, which has a
/etc/modutils/emu10k1 file, which contains th
LeVA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have noticed that when I load a module the
> /etc/modutils/ files, which conatins the "post-install"
> lines, doesn't run.
> So when I load my emu10k1 for example, which has a
> /etc/modutils/emu10k1 file, which contains th
Hello!
I have noticed that when I load a module the /etc/modutils/
files, which conatins the "post-install" lines, doesn't run.
So when I load my emu10k1 for example, which has a /etc/modutils/emu10k1
file, which contains this line:
post-install emu10k1 /usr/local/etc/emu-scr
Cheryl Homiak wrote:
If I understand correctly, the package module-init-tools is for 2.6
kernels, and the modutils components for 2.4 kernels (rmmod, lsmod,
insmod) are being renamed with a .modutils extension in debian unstable.
I am running debian unstable, and just had trouble installing a
If I understand correctly, the package module-init-tools is for 2.6
kernels, and the modutils components for 2.4 kernels (rmmod, lsmod,
insmod) are being renamed with a .modutils extension in debian unstable.
I am running debian unstable, and just had trouble installing a commercial
package (oss
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:46:03 +0200, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> On Sunday 21 September 2003 13:16, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I tired to install a 2.6.0-test4 (debain release) kernel. After the
>> reboot i was not able to use the modutils (and all modules)
On Sunday 21 September 2003 13:16, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi
>
> I tired to install a 2.6.0-test4 (debain release) kernel. After the reboot
> i was not able to use the modutils (and all modules) at all. It says that
> "QM_MODULES" is not implementet. After some go
Hi
I tired to install a 2.6.0-test4 (debain release) kernel. After the reboot i
was not able to use the modutils (and all modules) at all. It says that
"QM_MODULES" is not implementet. After some googling around i know that
modultis need to be patched to work proper with the 2.6 ker
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:13:55PM -0400, David Morse wrote:
> Is there somewhere a cookbook or HOWTO for writing files for
> /etc/modutils/* . I have to write files for my usb mouse and for my
> sound chip, and I have no clue. I see on another system
man update-modules
Pay p
--- David Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> I try it on my machine and startx doesn't auto-load the usb mouse, but
> manually modprobing the mentioned modules works well.
>
Try adding the necessary modules to your /etc/modules file. They go one per
line, and are loaded on boot.
-Roberto
Is there somewhere a cookbook or HOWTO for writing files for
/etc/modutils/* . I have to write files for my usb mouse and for my
sound chip, and I have no clue. I see on another system
/etc/modutils/usb:__
alias char-major-13 mousedev
below mousedev hid
below hid usb
--- Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> > Because, as of kernel 2.5.48 the kernel modules now end in .ko and have a
> > completely different internal structure. The new module-init-tools does
> not
> > handle old style modules, but recognizes and passes them
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 00:26, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> --- Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> > It seems that modutils and module-init-tools are duplicating most of the
> > work.
> > Both of them do some check as of the kernel's ability to load modules,
&
8 the kernel modules now end in .ko and have a
> completely different internal structure. The new module-init-tools does not
> handle old style modules, but recognizes and passes them on to modutils.
> The old modutils knows nothing of the new formats and will barf all over itself
>
8 the kernel modules now end in .ko and have a
> completely different internal structure. The new module-init-tools does not
> handle old style modules, but recognizes and passes them on to modutils.
> The old modutils knows nothing of the new formats and will barf all over itself
>
not
handle old style modules, but recognizes and passes them on to modutils.
The old modutils knows nothing of the new formats and will barf all over itself
if you attempt to build, load, remove, or otherwise operate on a module with
it.
The sh
--- Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> It seems that modutils and module-init-tools are duplicating most of the
> work.
> Both of them do some check as of the kernel's ability to load modules,
> module-init-tools also checks for /proc/modules.
> Then both r
It seems that modutils and module-init-tools are duplicating most of the
work.
Both of them do some check as of the kernel's ability to load modules,
module-init-tools also checks for /proc/modules.
Then both run depmod, modutils does a bit more work at it.
Next both of them load all the mo
Quoting matt zagrabelny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[snip]
> thanks, that helps. one more question:
>
> if /etc/modutils/arch/i386 describes the mappings, where is the module
> (char-major-10-135) being told to load at boot time?
>
>
Somewhere in the /lib/modules/2.X.X direct
quot;alias char-major-10-135 rtc" line in
> > > > /etc/modutils/arch/i386 by the following:
> > > >
> > > > #alias char-major-10-135 rtc
> > > >
> > > > then run update-modules, however on reboot i still get
> > > > the
Quoting matt zagrabelny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 00:43, Martin Kacerovsky wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:47:23PM -0600, matt zagrabelny wrote:
> > > i commented out the "alias char-major-10-135 rtc" line in
> > &g
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 00:43, Martin Kacerovsky wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:47:23PM -0600, matt zagrabelny wrote:
> > i commented out the "alias char-major-10-135 rtc" line in
> > /etc/modutils/arch/i386 by the following:
> >
> > #alias char-majo
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:47:23PM -0600, matt zagrabelny wrote:
> i commented out the "alias char-major-10-135 rtc" line in
> /etc/modutils/arch/i386 by the following:
>
> #alias char-major-10-135 rtc
>
> then run update-modules, however on reboot i still get
>
i commented out the "alias char-major-10-135 rtc" line in
/etc/modutils/arch/i386 by the following:
#alias char-major-10-135 rtc
then run update-modules, however on reboot i still get the error message
about loading the char-major-10-135 module. but when i do the following:
alias cha
On Saturday 02 February 2002 13:57, Florian wrote:
> On Saturday 02 February 2002 13:44, Florian wrote:
> > Howdy im having a little error on dselect running update.
> > When configuring modutils i get the message:
> >
> > running dpkg --pending --configure ...
> &
On Saturday 02 February 2002 13:44, Florian wrote:
> Howdy im having a little error on dselect running update.
> When configuring modutils i get the message:
>
> running dpkg --pending --configure ...
> Setting up modutils (2.4.13-1) ...
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
> /
Howdy im having a little error on dselect running update.
When configuring modutils i get the message:
running dpkg --pending --configure ...
Setting up modutils (2.4.13-1) ...
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.17-k7/kernel/drivers/usb/pwcx-i386.o
dpkg: error processing modutils
>
> I was trying to upgrade my system the other day and apt-get upgrade
> first tells me that my modutils can't be configured since my kernel
> sturcture has changed. I figured nothing of but now it's not just
> modutils it's initrd-tools and modconf as well. I tri
I was trying to upgrade my system the other day and apt-get upgrade
first tells me that my modutils can't be configured since my kernel
sturcture has changed. I figured nothing of but now it's not just
modutils it's initrd-tools and modconf as well. I tried upgrading to a
ne
Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
> >depmod: Unexpected value (20) in
> >'/lib/modules/2.4.9-686/kernel/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.o' for
> >ieee1394_device_size
>
> Known bug. The modutils package m
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>My last apt-get upgrade tried to upgrade modutils and then bombed with
>the following message:
>
>Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
>depmod: Unexpected value (20) in
>'/lib/modules/2.4.9-686/kernel
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:22:54AM -0500, DvB wrote:
> My last apt-get upgrade tried to upgrade modutils and then bombed with
> the following message:
>
> Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
> depmod: Unexpected value (20) in
> '/lib/modules/2.4.9-686/kernel/drive
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:37:13AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:22:54AM -0500, DvB wrote:
| > My last apt-get upgrade tried to upgrade modutils and then bombed with
| > the following message:
| >
| > Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
| > depmod: U
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:22:54AM -0500, DvB wrote:
> My last apt-get upgrade tried to upgrade modutils and then bombed with
> the following message:
>
> Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
> depmod: Unexpected value (20) in
> '/lib/modules/2.4.9-686/kernel/drive
My last apt-get upgrade tried to upgrade modutils and then bombed with
the following message:
Setting up modutils (2.4.10-3) ...
depmod: Unexpected value (20) in
'/lib/modules/2.4.9-686/kernel/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.o' for ieee1394_device_size
It is likely that the kernel str
It appears that the maintainer of modutils set the priority of bug
114186 from grave to important, so the uninstallable modutils 2.4.10-3
made it into testing.
Isn't a bug that makes a package uninstallable supposed to be given a
higher priority that will prevent it from going into te
Well, I didn't see Wichert's note about modutils being broken, and
now I've gotten into a state. I tried updating my kernel from 2.4.9 to
kernel-image-2.4.10-k6, and the upgrade of modutils failed because of
the unresolved symbols from the ieee1394 driver.
Here's the outpu
The current version of modutils in unstable does not work with
the ieee1394 drivers from the 2.4 Linux kernels. In a good
demonstration of how to maintain a stable codebase the kernel
developers changed some data structures that broke things.
This means that if you need to use 1394 drivers you
oaded.
> ** What could be the cause?
> ** I have reinstalled modutils two times (yes, I'm desperate), but the same
> ** thing happens.
you have to use modutils 2.4.x for work with kernel 2.4!
Timo
Robert Waldner wrote:
> There´s a FAQ on www.debian.org about that, see
> http://www.debian.org/News/2001/20010415
OK, I've upgraded all the necessary packages; now depmod works fine.
Thanks a lot.
BTW, I see some conflicting programs; those on net-tools and netbase.
debsums net-tools would retu
Matthew Dalton wrote:
>
> Oki DZ wrote:
> > It seems that libc6 has to be upgraded too; what are the consequences of
> > having unstable libs on a stable machine?
>
> Why not compile your own modutils package from the sources in unstable?
> You don't need to upgra
Robert Waldner wrote:
> There´s a FAQ on www.debian.org about that, see
> http://www.debian.org/News/2001/20010415
I see, it's already on the homepage...
Well, I think it's time to have a new feature on apt-get; it has to
print something like:
"Hi, wanna hear some news before continuing?" [Y/n]
a
Oki DZ wrote:
> It seems that libc6 has to be upgraded too; what are the consequences of
> having unstable libs on a stable machine?
Why not compile your own modutils package from the sources in unstable?
You don't need to upgrade glibc then.
> Well, actually, my question
>
On Wed, 23 May 2001 12:33:12 +0700, Oki DZ writes:
>It seems that libc6 has to be upgraded too; what are the consequences of
>having unstable libs on a stable machine? Well, actually, my question
>is: what unstable packages do you have to install on a stable machine in
>order to have the machine h
hat version you're currently
> | running, the suggested command should tell you.
> |
> | [...]
> |
> | o modutils 2.4.2 # insmod -V
> `
It means that the package has to be reinstalled from unstable, right?
I have updated my sources.list so tha
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Oki DZ said:
> "Noah L. Meyerhans" wrote:
>> What version of modutils are you using?
>
> ii modutils 2.3.11-13.1Linux module utilities.
,[ /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Changes ]
| Current Minimal Requirements
| ==
"Noah L. Meyerhans" wrote:
> What version of modutils are you using?
ii modutils 2.3.11-13.1Linux module utilities.
Running on stable Debian.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a
Linux bdg 2.4.4 #6 Fri May 4 11:53:01 JAVT 2001 i686 unknown
Oki
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:29:05AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> If I did "depmod -a" then /lib/modules/2.4.4/modules.dep would become 0
> in size.
What version of modutils are you using?
noah
--
___
| Web: http://web.morgul.n
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:29:05AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I did "depmod -a" then /lib/modules/2.4.4/modules.dep would become 0
> in size.
>
> Pretty interesting... if modules.dep's size is 0, then no module could
> be loaded.
> What could be t
Hi,
If I did "depmod -a" then /lib/modules/2.4.4/modules.dep would become 0
in size.
Pretty interesting... if modules.dep's size is 0, then no module could
be loaded.
What could be the cause?
I have reinstalled modutils two times (yes, I'm desperate), but the same
thing happens.
Oki
puid.o
>Symbol version prefix ''
>
> >
> > i suppose it is becaue of those wrong paths? but how can i put them right?
> > any ideas?
>
> I out of ideas. I may suggest:
> 1) Are you shure that modules are from your current kernel? When you
> compile
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
