On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 09:10:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:42:37 -0600, "CW Harris"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> >
> > Is this a typo? or are you using kernel 2.6.7 with an append-to-version
> > of 1? I would recommend you use "-" (hyphen) before numeric
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:42:37 -0600, "CW Harris"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 12:15:29PM +0200, Inge Thorin Eidsæther wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys, and thanks for all your help so far!
> >
.
> > - Modules are found in correct location,that is:
> > /lib/modules/2.6.71, wh
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 12:15:29PM +0200, Inge Thorin Eidsæther wrote:
>
> Hi guys, and thanks for all your help so far!
>
> Observations:
>
> - I misspelled moudule-init-tools as modutils-init-tools.
> Sorry! Did all file searches by correct name, though.
>
> - module-init-tools was installe
Hi guys, and thanks for all your help so far!
Observations:
- I misspelled moudule-init-tools as modutils-init-tools.
Sorry! Did all file searches by correct name, though.
- module-init-tools was installed BEFORE kernel recompile
- A non-initrd kernel image was made
- Documentation/post-halloween
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 08:41:31PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:40 -0600, CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > [...]
> > >
> > > You normally don't need a modprobe.conf, everything should b
Wim De Smet([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:02:07 -0400, Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Wim De Smet([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:40 -0600, CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Wed,
le in /lib/modules/uname -r directory? If not,
depmod possibly failed, try a depmod -a and then a modprobe again.
HTH
Awais
- Original Message -
From: "Wim De Smet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 5:17 PM
Subject: Re
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:02:07 -0400, Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Wim De Smet([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:40 -0600, CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> >
Wim De Smet([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:40 -0600, CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > [...]
> > >
> > > You normally don't need a modprobe.conf, everything should be in
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:40 -0600, CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> [...]
> >
> > You normally don't need a modprobe.conf, everything should be in
> > /etc/modprobe.d. modprobe.conf is just an empty file on my system.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> Hi,
>
[...]
>
> You normally don't need a modprobe.conf, everything should be in
> /etc/modprobe.d. modprobe.conf is just an empty file on my system. I'm
Is this true? Mine (a most
Hi,
First of all sorry to the list that I replied directly to the poster.
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:27:21 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:47:28 +0200, "Wim De Smet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:34:52 +0200,
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:47:28 +0200, "Wim De Smet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:34:52 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have recently upgraded my Debian system (running testing)
> > from kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4 to 2.7.1 by following
13 matches
Mail list logo