Re: apache+libapache-mod-ssl vs apache-ssl?

2002-11-09 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 17:47:42 +0100, Andrea Borgia wrote: > Right now I'm using apache-ssl, but I noticed that it is something > different from apache + libapache-mod-ssl. > > What is not clear to me is exactly how the two options differ and what the > relative pros and cons of each choice are.

apache+libapache-mod-ssl vs apache-ssl?

2002-11-09 Thread Andrea Borgia
Hello. Right now I'm using apache-ssl, but I noticed that it is something different from apache + libapache-mod-ssl. What is not clear to me is exactly how the two options differ and what the relative pros and cons of each choice are. Could anyone shed some light, please? TIA, Andrea. -- Mä mui

Re: mod-ssl vs apache-ssl

2001-08-28 Thread Angus D Madden
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 01:18:03PM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote: > A little while ago, Hans (obviously from Northern Germany--moin > moin!) asked whether it was "better" to use mod-ssl or apache-ssl. > That question wasn't really answered. > > Are there any advantages of apache-ssl over apache

Re: mod-ssl vs apache-ssl

2001-08-27 Thread Bill Wohler
"der.hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW, the previous consensus seemed to be run whatever you want :). My problem is that I don't know what I want ;-). What is Debian policy about adding features to apache? Are developers required to add the features to apache-ssl too, or required to

Re: mod-ssl vs apache-ssl

2001-08-27 Thread der.hans
Am 26. Aug, 2001 schwäzte Erdmut Pfeifer so: > In terms of practical usability, I'd say no -- at least I wouldn't > know of any. If you search the web for differences between the two SSL > implementations, about the only thing you'll find is a difference in > philosophy: apache-ssl is primarily fo

Re: mod-ssl vs apache-ssl

2001-08-26 Thread Erdmut Pfeifer
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 01:18:03PM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote: > A little while ago, Hans (obviously from Northern Germany--moin > moin!) asked whether it was "better" to use mod-ssl or apache-ssl. > That question wasn't really answered. > > Since libapache-mod-jk only attaches itself to apa

mod-ssl vs apache-ssl

2001-08-26 Thread Bill Wohler
A little while ago, Hans (obviously from Northern Germany--moin moin!) asked whether it was "better" to use mod-ssl or apache-ssl. That question wasn't really answered. Since libapache-mod-jk only attaches itself to apache, I'm now considering apache (with mod-ssl) over apache-ssl. I