On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, laur...@leboucher.net wrote:
May I ask why there is no MD5SUM for the old stable version of live
debian?
it sounds like, somewhere on the internet, you've managed to find a
live install image of squeeze.
may
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, laur...@leboucher.net wrote:
May I ask why there is no MD5SUM for the old stable version of live
debian?
it sounds like, somewhere on the internet, you've managed to find a
live install image of squeeze.
may i ask where?
knowing the answer to that might help answer
On Tuesday 24 June 2014 19:29:48 Bob Proulx wrote:
> Please no HTML email. It is terribly difficult to read.
So some of us don't try. I am impressed, Bob!
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
laur...@leboucher.net wrote:
>
Please no HTML email. It is terribly difficult to read.
> May I ask why there is no style="font-family: Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #4d4d4d;
> line-height: 15px; white-space: pre;">MD5SUM class="Apple-style-span&q
May I ask why there is no MD5SUM for the old stable version of live debian?
Cheers
Laurent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.
Andreas Rönnquist wrote:
On Mon, 06 May 2013 12:50:58 -0500,
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
Where does one find the md5sum for debian-7.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso?
Hugo
Its available in the MD5SUMS file in the same folder as the ISO:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.0.0/amd64/iso-cd/MD5SUMS
Hello Hugo,
Excerpt from Hugo Vanwoerkom:
> Hi,
>
> Where does one find the md5sum for debian-7.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso?
>
> Hugo
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.0.0/amd64/iso-cd/MD5SUMS
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.0.0/amd64/iso-cd/MD5SUMS.sign
The file MD5SUMS
On Mon, 06 May 2013 12:50:58 -0500,
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Where does one find the md5sum for debian-7.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso?
>
>Hugo
Its available in the MD5SUMS file in the same folder as the ISO:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/7.0.0/amd64/iso-cd/MD5SUMS
-- An
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 12:50:58PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where does one find the md5sum for debian-7.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso?
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/MD5SUMS
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the p
Hi,
Where does one find the md5sum for debian-7.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso?
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/km8qhp$c5u$1...@ger.gmane.org
on't tell us what errors you get (if any), so it's a little
difficult to say what you're doing wrong (for example, you might be
doing things right, but not understanding the output).
You say you've copied md5sum.exe to your %WINDIR%\system32 folder, so it
should be in your path now.
Hi Members,
Been at this for quite some time. I'm new to the application called
"md5sum.exe" thus please be patient. I researched the "how-to" and
attempted to verify the debian netinst file called,
"debian-6.0.5-i386-inetinst.iso" that I downloaded yesterday.
I'm using windows 2000 and windows 7
-Original Message-
From: M. Lewis [mailto:ca...@cajuninc.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 3:33 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Checking the md5sum of a burned CD
>
> I've burned a CD from a .iso image. Now I want to verify the
> burning process worked co
On 2009-03-19_16:33:50, T o n g wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:06:55 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> >> So the CD itself and checkisomd is all you need to verify it, even
> >> after several years, and you've forgot where you put its original
> >>
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:06:55 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
>> So the CD itself and checkisomd is all you need to verify it, even
>> after several years, and you've forgot where you put its original
>> md5sum. . .
>
> I think you are misunderstanding the situation,
rted). Note, I
>>>> verified the md5sums of the .iso's before I burned them. So now I'd like
>>>> to check the burned CD against that md5sum.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Mike
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> "md5sum /dev/cd
e .iso's before I burned them. So now I'd like
> > to check the burned CD against that md5sum.
>
> The best approach for checking burned CDs, which is what Red Hat used, is
> implanting a MD5 checksum to it by implantisomd5, and verify later with
> checkisomd5.
>
> to check the burned CD against that md5sum.
The best approach for checking burned CDs, which is what Red Hat used, is
implanting a MD5 checksum to it by implantisomd5, and verify later with
checkisomd5.
So the CD itself and checkisomd is all you need to verify it, even after
several years, and
5sums of the .iso's before I burned them. So now I'd like
>>> to check the burned CD against that md5sum.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Mike
>> Hi,
>>
>> "md5sum /dev/cdrom" or "md5sum /dev/scd0" works here (Squeeze and
>
thveillon.debian wrote:
M. Lewis a écrit :
I've burned a CD from a .iso image. Now I want to verify the burning
process worked correctly (there were no errors reported). Note, I
verified the md5sums of the .iso's before I burned them. So now I'd like
to check the burned CD agai
M. Lewis a écrit :
>
> I've burned a CD from a .iso image. Now I want to verify the burning
> process worked correctly (there were no errors reported). Note, I
> verified the md5sums of the .iso's before I burned them. So now I'd like
> to check the burned CD ag
I've burned a CD from a .iso image. Now I want to verify the burning
process worked correctly (there were no errors reported). Note, I
verified the md5sums of the .iso's before I burned them. So now I'd like
to check the burned CD against that md5sum.
Thanks,
Mike
--
Old pr
Am 2008-08-01 10:49:05, schrieb abdelkader belahcene:
> Hi everybody,
> I want to install flashplugin, Ther is an error on md5sum, I want to skip
> it, I mean not check it.
> I used the --force-all, but it failed
>
>
> debian225:/home/bela/Desktop# dpkg --force-al
Hi,
Thanks to all,
My question was precise, I know about dependances, pb between debian and
ubuntu etc...
Please I asked if it possible to run dpkg without checking md5sum !
just this please.
thanks bela
On Fri Aug 01 2008 @ 1:35, Chris Davies wrote:
> [Ubuntu packages can't install on Debian] ...because of all the
> (missing) dependencies, or some other reason?
Telemachus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because they're not binary compatible. http://tinyurl.com/652qwj
Ah. Thanks,
Chris
--
To UNS
On Fri Aug 01 2008 @ 1:35, Chris Davies wrote:
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, I see you are trying to install a Ubuntu package. If your system
> > is Debian, mixing packages from Ubuntu is not a very good idea.
>
> ...because of all the (missing) dependencies, or some
Chris Davies wrote:
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Also, I see you are trying to install a Ubuntu package. If your system
>> is Debian, mixing packages from Ubuntu is not a very good idea.
>
> ...because of all the (missing) dependencies, or some other reason?
>
> Cheers,
>
Chris Davies escreveu:
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, I see you are trying to install a Ubuntu package. If your system
is Debian, mixing packages from Ubuntu is not a very good idea.
...because of all the (missing) dependencies, or some other reason?
Because
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, I see you are trying to install a Ubuntu package. If your system
> is Debian, mixing packages from Ubuntu is not a very good idea.
...because of all the (missing) dependencies, or some other reason?
Cheers,
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
abdelkader belahcene wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
> I want to install flashplugin, Ther is an error on md5sum, I want
> to skip it, I mean not check it.
> I used the --force-all, but it failed
>
>
> debian225:/home/bela/Desktop# dpkg --force-all-i
> flashplugi
Hi everybody,
I want to install flashplugin, Ther is an error on md5sum, I want to skip
it, I mean not check it.
I used the --force-all, but it failed
debian225:/home/bela/Desktop# dpkg --force-all-i
flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1~7.04.1_i386.deb
Download done.
md5sum mismatch
Hello. I was hoping to create a CD-ROM of both Debian's non-free and
multimedia repositories. Via debmirror, I downloaded the non-free
repository. I then burned this to disk, but, upon trying to add the
CD-ROM to my sources.list via "apt-cdrom add", I received MD5sum not
found
/source/Sources.gz... ok
dists/sid/main/source/Sources.gz failed md5sum check
dists/sid/main/source/Sources needs fetch
[ 19%] Getting: dists/sid/main/source/Sources...
dists/sid/main/source/Sources failed 404 Not Found
dists/sid/main/source/Sources failed md5sum check, removing
dists/sid/main
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/27/07 23:34, Bill Moseley wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:13:30PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
>>> Or is this a temporary problem?
>> Bingo, and typically only on the host you happen to contact.
>
> Well, I tried a few different sources with s
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:13:30PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> > Or is this a temporary problem?
>
> Bingo, and typically only on the host you happen to contact.
Well, I tried a few different sources with similar results. I did
find one source where apt-get update didn't report problems, but
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 11:00 -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> apt-get update is showing:
>
> Failed to fetch
> http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/non-free/binary-i386/Packages.bz2
> MD5Sum mismatch
> Failed to fetch
> http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists
apt-get update is showing:
Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/non-free/binary-i386/Packages.bz2
MD5Sum mismatch
Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/source/Sources.bz2 MD5Sum
mismatch
Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org
6
>
> Hi,
>
> Grok Mogger wrote:
> > Allan Wind wrote:
> >> On 2006-10-20T07:33:46-0700, Dave Carrigan wrote:
> >>> find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 md5sum > /tmp/source.sums
> >>> cd /dest/dir
> >>> find . -type f -print0 | xargs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Grok Mogger wrote:
> Allan Wind wrote:
>> On 2006-10-20T07:33:46-0700, Dave Carrigan wrote:
>>> find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 md5sum > /tmp/source.sums
>>> cd /dest/dir
>>> find . -type f -print0 | xa
Grok Mogger wrote:
I have about 36 GB of files on a hard disk that I've transfered to
another disk. I'd like to cksum or md5sum the files just to make sure
that they were all copied well. I can't seem to find a way to recurse
through the directories and do this to a lot
Grok Mogger wrote:
I have about 36 GB of files on a hard disk that I've transfered
to another disk. I'd like to cksum or md5sum the files just to
make sure that they were all copied well. I can't seem to find
a way to recurse through the directories and do this to a lot o
Grok Mogger wrote:
> I have about 36 GB of files on a hard disk that I've transfered
> to another disk. I'd like to cksum or md5sum the files just to
> make sure that they were all copied well.
I have the same need, and wrote a Perl script "md5sums" to g
porchlight.ca> writes:
> Couldn't you use cat and shasum:
> in the directories of interest:
> cat * | sha1sum > SHASUMS
>
> then compare the SHASUMS files?
'cat *' will concatenate all the files into one big lump, so if there's any
error, you won't know w
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 05:27:23PM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Grok Mogger wrote:
> >I have about 36 GB of files on a hard disk that I've transfered to
> >another disk. I'd like to cksum or md5sum the files just to make sure
> >that they were all copied well.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 10:07:29PM +, Chris Moore wrote:
> > I'd like to cksum or md5sum the files just to
> > make sure that they were all copied well. I can't seem to find
> > a way to recurse through the directories and do this to a lot of
> > files.
&
Grok Mogger wrote:
I have about 36 GB of files on a hard disk that I've transfered to
another disk. I'd like to cksum or md5sum the files just to make sure
that they were all copied well. I can't seem to find a way to recurse
through the directories and do this to a lot
Grok Mogger gmail.com> writes:
> I'd like to cksum or md5sum the files just to
> make sure that they were all copied well. I can't seem to find
> a way to recurse through the directories and do this to a lot of
> files.
There's a package called 'cfv'
On Oct 20, 2006, at 8:19 AM, David Hart wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:10:12AM -0400, Grok Mogger wrote:
How should I go about sorting it?
Pipe it though 'sort'.
find . -type f -print0 | sort | xargs -0 md5sum > /tmp/source.sums
Actually that won't work because
On Friday 20 October 2006 11:07, Grok Mogger wrote:
> Thanks, I thought something like that was probably doable, but
> my bash skills are not at the point where I could have figured
> it out on my own.
Just want to clarify something here. find, xargs, sort, grep etc., are not
specific to bash. T
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 11:10:12AM -0400, Grok Mogger wrote:
> Allan Wind wrote:
> >On 2006-10-20T07:33:46-0700, Dave Carrigan wrote:
> >>find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 md5sum > /tmp/source.sums
> >>cd /dest/dir
> >>find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 m
Allan Wind wrote:
On 2006-10-20T07:33:46-0700, Dave Carrigan wrote:
find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 md5sum > /tmp/source.sums
cd /dest/dir
find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 md5sum > /tmp/dest.sums
diff -u /tmp/source.sums /tmp/dest.sums
Might need a sort in there before redirecting to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/06 08:58, Grok Mogger wrote:
> I have about 36 GB of files on a hard disk that I've transfered to
> another disk. I'd like to cksum or md5sum the files just to make sure
> that they were all copied well. I can'
Dave Carrigan wrote:
On Oct 20, 2006, at 6:58 AM, Grok Mogger wrote:
I have about 36 GB of files on a hard disk that I've transfered to
another disk. I'd like to cksum or md5sum the files just to make sure
that they were all copied well. I can't seem to find a way to recur
On 2006-10-20T07:33:46-0700, Dave Carrigan wrote:
> find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 md5sum > /tmp/source.sums
> cd /dest/dir
> find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 md5sum > /tmp/dest.sums
> diff -u /tmp/source.sums /tmp/dest.sums
Might need a sort in there before redirecting
On Oct 20, 2006, at 6:58 AM, Grok Mogger wrote:
I have about 36 GB of files on a hard disk that I've transfered to
another disk. I'd like to cksum or md5sum the files just to make
sure that they were all copied well. I can't seem to find a way to
recurse through the dir
I have about 36 GB of files on a hard disk that I've transfered
to another disk. I'd like to cksum or md5sum the files just to
make sure that they were all copied well. I can't seem to find
a way to recurse through the directories and do this to a lot of
files. I've look
I had the same problem and I fix it changing my apt
sources.
Bye
S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 11:59, Marty wrote:
[snip]
>> > my isp use simple windows Xp internet connection sharing.
>> > Is the windows connection sharing is the problem ???
>>
>> Does that mean you are using a VP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 11:59, Marty wrote:
>[snip]
>> >> > my isp use simple windows Xp internet connection sharing.
> >> > Is the windows connection sharing is the problem ???
> >>
> >> Does that mean you are using a VPN or other kind of IP t
tting a strange problem. i am trying to download some
> CD. But, bad luck, never md5sum works (not mached) for me. even mpg or
> wmv files all the time corrupted.
>
> my isp use simple windows Xp internet connection sharing.
> Is the windows connection sharing is the problem ???
Does th
a strange problem. i am trying to download some
> > CD. But, bad luck, never md5sum works (not mached) for me. even mpg or
> > wmv files all the time corrupted.
> >
> > my isp use simple windows Xp internet connection sharing.
> > Is the windows connection sharing is
S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
3 month ago, i started new net connection.
- From then, i am getting a strange problem. i am trying to download some CD.
But, bad luck, never md5sum works (not mached) for me. even mpg or wmv files
all the time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
3 month ago, i started new net connection.
- From then, i am getting a strange problem. i am trying to download some CD.
But, bad luck, never md5sum works (not mached) for me. even mpg or wmv files
all the time corrupted.
my isp use simple windows
:13:22PM -0400, Jos? Alburquerque wrote:
> Sebastian Canagaratna wrote:
>
> >Hi:
> >
> > I am trying to update my unstable on one of my linux machines and it
> > gives
> >
> > Failes to fetch
> > http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/
Sebastian Canagaratna wrote:
Hi:
I am trying to update my unstable on one of my linux machines and it
gives
Failes to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
MD5Sum mismatch
same for Packages.gz in non-free/binary-i386
W: Could'nt
Hi:
I am trying to update my unstable on one of my linux machines and it
gives
Failes to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
MD5Sum mismatch
same for Packages.gz in non-free/binary-i386
W: Could'nt stat source package list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:41:20 +1000
John O'Hagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 04 August 2006 11:03, Jacob S wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:58:06 -0400
> [...]
> >
> > I have been experiencing this same error, sometimes mixed with a
> > gz
> > Failed to fetch
> > > http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/binary-i386/Packages.g
> > >z MD5Sum mismatch
> > > Failed to fetch
> > > http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/non-free/binary-i386/Packag
> > >es.gz MD5Sum mismatch
>
t; > http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
> > MD5Sum mismatch
> > Failed to fetch
> > http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/non-free/binary-i386/Packages.gz
> >
> > MD5Sum mismatch
> > Failed to fetch
> >
José Alburquerque wrote:
My problem is that when I run 'apt-get update' I get these errors:
Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
MD5Sum mismatch
Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/non-free/binary-i386/P
on either, so I just used an old 3com 509 card I had and that
succeeded.
My problem is that when I run 'apt-get update' I get these errors:
Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
MD5Sum mismatch
Failed to fetch
http://http.us.debian.
I have burned the 14 i386 debian CDs a couple of times using my Windows machine, but the md5sum (md5sum -c md5sum.txt) on CD1 keeps telling me there are 17 files whose md5 did not match the md5sum.txt file.
I verified the iso file I burned from is good
Here is the kicker... I took one of my CDs
/usr/bin/md5sum belongs to dpkg, not coreutils. The latter's is
renamed md5sum.textutils. The two behave differently wrt '-v': the
older, dpkg version requires it to see output of the '-c' option,
while the newer coreutils version, does not.
Why doesn't Debian defau
If I use the "-dao" option while buring a CD using cdrecord, I get a
md5sum match between the iso I burned and the CD device:
$> cdrecord blank=fast -v -eject -dao dev=/dev/hdd data.iso
However, if I do not use the "-dao" option, the md5sum of /dev/hdd and
the iso image
a computer with a flaky
> > cd-rom)
> >
> > There are md5sums at
> > http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/other/MD5SUMS
> >
> > My vmlinuz md5 matches up, but the initrd.gz md5sum does not match. I
> > re-downloaded with no change, still in disag
> There are md5sums at
> http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/other/MD5SUMS
>
> My vmlinuz md5 matches up, but the initrd.gz md5sum does not match. I
> re-downloaded with no change, still in disagreement the archive:
>
> My md5sum:
> ca838dff73b15963
S
My vmlinuz md5 matches up, but the initrd.gz md5sum does not match. I
re-downloaded with no change, still in disagreement the archive:
My md5sum:
ca838dff73b15963544ea21537ccaa8f initrd.gz
archive md5sum:
250db6ab320fc5edcecf3ed9d1c185a6 ./hd-media/2.6/initrd.gz
(My vmlinuz md5 matches the ar
On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 06:59 +0200, John Que wrote:
> Hello,
> I am a newbie to Debian.
> I had downloaded the dvd iso for debian:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-dvd
> This site is condisered the primary CD image server
> according to http://www.debian.org.
>
> (I download
Hello,
I am a newbie to Debian.
I had downloaded the dvd iso for debian:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-dvd
This site is condisered the primary CD image server
according to http://www.debian.org.
(I downloaded it through http because there was some problem with my bittorent
Pollywog wrote:
When I do a md5sum check on large files (500MB or larger), I get this sort of
error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/RO$ md5sum RO_Beta_v3.2_Full.zip
error processing RO_Beta_v3.2_Full.zip: failed in buffer_read(fd): mdfile:
Input/output error
Does anyone know what is going on?
thanks
8
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 03:30:12AM +, Pollywog wrote:
> When I do a md5sum check on large files (500MB or larger), I get this sort of
> error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/RO$ md5sum RO_Beta_v3.2_Full.zip
> error processing RO_Beta_v3.2_Full.zip: failed in buffer_read(fd): mdfile:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 11:35:22PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Pollywog wrote:
> > When I do a md5sum check on large files (500MB or larger), I get this sort
> > of
> > error:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/RO$ md5sum RO_Beta_v3.2_Full.zip
> > error p
Pollywog wrote:
> When I do a md5sum check on large files (500MB or larger), I get this sort of
> error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/RO$ md5sum RO_Beta_v3.2_Full.zip
> error processing RO_Beta_v3.2_Full.zip: failed in buffer_read(fd): mdfile:
> Input/output error
>
>
&g
When I do a md5sum check on large files (500MB or larger), I get this sort of
error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/RO$ md5sum RO_Beta_v3.2_Full.zip
error processing RO_Beta_v3.2_Full.zip: failed in buffer_read(fd): mdfile:
Input/output error
Does anyone know what is going on?
thanks
8)
--
To
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Matthias Czapla wrote:
I have no idea, but I use something like this to recurse down a tree and
do something with every file:
#!/bin/bash
for i in `find -type f`
do
whatever you wan't to do, just use $i instead of the filename.
done
This will not work if any component of a
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 02:18:55PM +0200, Sturla Holm Hansen wrote:
> Since I'm kinda new at this I just have to ask what's wrong with a
> for-loop..
> To slow?
Depends on what you do in the loop's body.
> I have no idea, but I use something like this to recurse down a tree and
> do something wit
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 10:54:59AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> >BTW, what are all those files in your home directory? I have only
> >about 14000 and thought that this is the biggest mess ever ;)
>
> Oh, stuff. source of debs, built and otherwise. CVS checkouts of stuff.
> Documents. Photos (s
Sturla Holm Hansen wrote:
BTW, what are all those files in your home directory? I have only
about 14000 and thought that this is the biggest mess ever ;)
Oh, stuff. source of debs, built and otherwise. CVS checkouts of
stuff. Documents. Photos (see my sig for some). IBM operating systems.
Lot
actual command isn't doing very much. For md5sum there is
practically
no difference in speed (have just done some measurements).
I think the results will depend
md5sum isn't the smallest binary around, but there are larger ones too.
If md5sum gets cached, that's RAM you can&#x
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, j smith wrote:
md5sum checks one file a time. i want a script that
recursively check files in a directory.Thanks!
PS: the script's application: in DOS 6, there is
antivirus program called "msav" that check if
executables are changed or infected. such progr
27;t doing very much. For md5sum there is practically
no difference in speed (have just done some measurements).
I think the results will depend
md5sum isn't the smallest binary around, but there are larger ones too.
If md5sum gets cached, that's RAM you can't use for something els
hanks for the
pointer.
> For slowness, consider this:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ find ~ -type f | wc -l
> 886076
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ find ~ -type f -print0 | xargs -0 | wc -l
> 3990
You're right, xargs is faster (60 times in the case of ls), but only if
the actual command i
ED] ~/tmp>find a -type f -exec md5sum {} \;
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e a/b b/file
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e a/ b/ c c/file
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e a/bb b /file with spaces
d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e a/file with spaces
Where's the problem?
The problem
2004-07-14 19:23 a b c d
[19:24:29] wesley:~/tmp/t $ find . -type f -exec md5sum '{}' \;
7b36fd049b94da0d04fbe0e932704e6b ./a b c d
In other words, it works fine.
> The problem is that fragments of file names separated by spaces are
> indistinguishable from filenames separa
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 02:21:52AM +0200, Matthias Czapla wrote:
> > The problem is that fragments of file names separated by spaces are
> > indistinguishable from filenames separated by spaces.
>
> This is only true when the command line is being split into words, e.g.
> by the shell. find's '{}
dsum, it's clearer to use
> the program he said he wants to use.
Generally true but in this case the specific command executed by find
is irrelevant.
> Try it and see what happens.
Ok:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/tmp>find a -type f -exec echo .{}. \;
.a/b b/file.
.a/ b/ c c/file.
Matthias Czapla wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 06:06:26AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
find ~ -type f -exec cat {} \;
This fails because
cat doesn't check anything - it just copies all files to stdout
It doesn't handle files whose names contain spaces
Hu? I used cat solely for the
Matthias Czapla wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 06:07:26AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
Matthias Czapla wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 02:31:10PM -0700, j smith wrote:
Thank you!
Windows has folder names that include space,
Example:"Program Files"
Will that cause trouble for your so
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 06:07:26AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> Matthias Czapla wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 02:31:10PM -0700, j smith wrote:
> >>Thank you!
> >>
> >>Windows has folder names that include space,
> >>Example:"Program Files"
> >>
> >>Will that cause trouble for your solution?
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 06:06:26AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> >
> >find ~ -type f -exec cat {} \;
> >
> >
> This fails because
> cat doesn't check anything - it just copies all files to stdout
> It doesn't handle files whose names contain spaces
Hu? I used cat solely for the purpose of show
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
