Hi,
Michael Stone wrote:
> I don't think there's any need to orphan a package to change maintainers.
Well possible. Three DDs = four opinions about packaging. :))
(I'm sitting on the fence, enjoying life as user and upstream.)
Whatever, Willem Vermin already posted a RFS bug a week ago:
https:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:03:33PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
The up-to-now maintainer should officially "orphan" the package so that
you can express your interest in taking over.
I don't think there's any need to orphan a package to change
maintainers.
Hi,
Willem Vermin wrote:
> the current maintainer of the package xsnow:
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/xsnow
> has let me know that he is not maintaining the package any more, and that it
> is OK with him that I take over maintenance.
> Can you please let me know how to procee
LS,
the current maintainer of the package xsnow:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/xsnow
has let me know that he is not maintaining the package any more, and
that it is OK with him that I take over maintenance.
Can you please let me know how to proceed?
Regards,
Willem Vermin
Erwan David wrote:
>
> systemd is NOT an init system. It is a global system pretending to
> replace init, session management,dns, ntp, and more and more other
> components with incomplete solutions thought only for the laptops of its
> developers (see the "we won't support hard disks, we all use
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:29:17 -0600
David Wright wrote:
>
> I can see that a post-mortem of what went wrong is useful, but I can't
> understand why you say that systemd made the "wrong" assumption.
> If you specify something wrongly, you can't really expect it to do
> what you want it to do, or
Le 01/10/2017 à 21:49, David Wright a écrit :
> On Tue 10 Jan 2017 at 20:54:50 (+0100), Steffen Dettmer wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible
you can still use sysvinit as init
>>
>> I read that trying to use sysvin
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 08:57:36 -0500 rhkra...@gmail.com sent:
> > > This is called evolution.
> >
> > There are dissenting views, and y'all know that.
>
> Just to get my $0.02 in, evolution makes many mistakes. In fact, it
> is a process of (accidental) trial and error. ;-)
After co
On Tue 10 Jan 2017 at 20:54:50 (+0100), Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >>> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible
> >>
> >> you can still use sysvinit as init
>
> I read that trying to use sysvinit causes trouble and several things
> depend on s
On Tue 10 Jan 2017 at 20:08:10 (+0100), Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Joe wrote:
> >> What happened before:
> >> I had issue with a Debian server SATA bus [1]. I noticed because
> >> apt-get upgrade hung, because initramfs updater calls "sync" which
> >> hang because of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 08:54:50PM +0100, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >>> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible
> >>
> >> you can still use sysvinit as init
>
> I read that trying to use sysvini
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:54:50 +0100
Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Michael Biebl
> wrote:
> >>
> >> you can still use sysvinit as init
>
> I read that trying to use sysvinit causes trouble and several things
> depend on systemd at the moment.
>
Various things requi
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:08:10 +0100
Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Joe wrote:
> >> What happened before:
> >> I had issue with a Debian server SATA bus [1]. I noticed because
> >> apt-get upgrade hung, because initramfs updater calls "sync" which
> >> hang because of [1]
Am 10.01.2017 um 20:08 schrieb Steffen Dettmer:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Joe wrote:
>>> What happened before:
>>> I had issue with a Debian server SATA bus [1]. I noticed because
>>> apt-get upgrade hung, because initramfs updater calls "sync" which
>>> hang because of [1]. All operations
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Monday, 9 January 2017 22:49:02 CET Steffen Dettmer wrote:
>> I'm looking at Jessie (Debian 8) man fsck. I found no refernce
>> to systemd. I think this is some compatiblity feature of systemd.
>
> See systemd.mount(5) and systemd.swa
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible
>>
>> you can still use sysvinit as init
I read that trying to use sysvinit causes trouble and several things
depend on systemd at the moment.
> The shell scripts used by sysvinit are not simpler.
age
from fsck either (actually fsck would even pass on the
example, which does not matter, since it was not even started).
Then I was in "maintenance mode" with 0 failed units, because
"fs mount unit" does not count in here. Also on Console all
lines were prefixed with "OK&q
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 03:39:06 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:14:48AM +0100, deloptes wrote:
>> > Michael Biebl wrote:
>> > > Am 10.01.2017 um 00:43 schrieb deloptes:
>> > >> Steffen Dettmer wrote:
>> > >>> I'd rather keep it as simple a
On Tue 10 Jan 2017 at 12:51:09 (+0100), Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Monday, 9 January 2017 22:49:02 CET Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> > I'm looking at Jessie (Debian 8) man fsck. I found no refernce
> > to systemd. I think this is some compatiblity feature of systemd.
>
> See systemd.mount(5) and sys
On Tuesday, January 10, 2017 03:39:06 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:14:48AM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> > Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > Am 10.01.2017 um 00:43 schrieb deloptes:
> > >> Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> > >>> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible
> > >>
> > >> you can
On Monday, 9 January 2017 22:49:02 CET Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> I'm looking at Jessie (Debian 8) man fsck. I found no refernce
> to systemd. I think this is some compatiblity feature of systemd.
See systemd.mount(5) and systemd.swap(5)
Compatiblity is done by systemd-fstab-generator
HTH
--
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:49:02PM +0100, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> Because man page says so? Because fsck's job is to check fs?
> Don't know what systemd interferes at all.
See systemd-fsck(8).
--
Jonathan Dowland
Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
signature.asc
Description: Dig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 09:14:48AM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> > Am 10.01.2017 um 00:43 schrieb deloptes:
> >> Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible
> >>
> >> you can still use sysvinit as i
Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 10.01.2017 um 00:43 schrieb deloptes:
>> Steffen Dettmer wrote:
>>
>>> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible
>>
>> you can still use sysvinit as init
>
> The shell scripts used by sysvinit are not simpler. More familiar maybe,
> but not simpler.
>
>
This is calle
Am 10.01.2017 um 00:43 schrieb deloptes:
> Steffen Dettmer wrote:
>
>> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible
>
> you can still use sysvinit as init
The shell scripts used by sysvinit are not simpler. More familiar maybe,
but not simpler.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking int
Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> I'd rather keep it as simple as possible
you can still use sysvinit as init
or follow without-systemd.org
regards
Hi,
thank you for your quick reply.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:38 AM, David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 08 Jan 2017 at 15:56:36 (+0100), Steffen Dettmer wrote:
>> apparently is ignored and "1" is assumed instead, BUT systemd does not
>> call fsck! fsck parsed the line as intended (pass=0 -> no check),
t I have no clue why it is suddenly missing or suddenly required.
> > I found postings in the internet that simply installing plymouth seems
> > not to solve this issue.
> >
> > What can I do about this?
> > Any hints appreciated.
> >
> > In detail:
> >
mment the /etc/fstab entry or
give it an extra option 'noauto'. Systemd assumes that any local drive
listed in /etc/fstab without 'noauto' is essential for booting, and will
drop you to maintenance mode if the drive cannot be found.
>
> Then server did not come up. Now I w
On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 14:28:09 +0100
Steffen Dettmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What happened before:
> I had issue with a Debian server SATA bus [1]. I noticed because
> apt-get upgrade hung, because initramfs updater calls "sync" which
> hang because of [1]. All operations accessing a certain (backup) disk
"
> but I have no clue why it is suddenly missing or suddenly required.
> I found postings in the internet that simply installing plymouth seems
> not to solve this issue.
>
> What can I do about this?
> Any hints appreciated.
>
> In detail:
> Google suggested "
sue.
What can I do about this?
Any hints appreciated.
In detail:
Google suggested "systemctl status". This shows "State: maintenance",
"Jobs: 0 queued", "Failed: 0 units" and some output looking like
pstree which tells me nothing.
Why "maintenance"
Hi,
What happened before:
I had issue with a Debian server SATA bus [1]. I noticed because
apt-get upgrade hung, because initramfs updater calls "sync" which
hang because of [1]. All operations accessing a certain (backup) disk
blocked. Shutdown over network. It was reported server power LED still
You are required to click on the link to verify your email account
because we are upgrading our webmail.http://monicakotnala.in/css/e/
Webmail Technical Support
Copyright 2012. All Rights Reserved
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
You are required to click on the link to verify your email account
because we are upgrading our webmail.http://monicakotnala.in/css/e/
Webmail Technical Support
Copyright 2012. All Rights Reserved
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
d today? Yes, no, maybe so?
Quantitatively multiply out those tens of thousands of packages times
how many seconds, how many minutes per each that general maintenance
takes, let alone any other developer driven [function] that might be
performed on them...
Oh, wait NOT done yet... Each p
> On 29/03/13 23:31, sirquij...@lavabit.com wrote:
despite the implication of the names, you may find either to be
(mostly) stable and useful, especially if old software is your only
trouble with Debian squeeze.
>>> Yeah, if it weren't for the older packages, I'd be content.
>>> How do I migra
On 29/03/13 23:31, sirquij...@lavabit.com wrote:
despite the implication of the names, you may find either to be
(mostly) stable and useful, especially if old software is your only
trouble with Debian squeeze.
Yeah, if it weren't for the older packages, I'd be content.
How do I migrate to test
>> despite the implication of the names, you may find either to be
>> (mostly) stable and useful, especially if old software is your only
>> trouble with Debian squeeze.
>
> Yeah, if it weren't for the older packages, I'd be content.
>
> How do I migrate to testing or unstable: does it require a re
> despite the implication of the names, you may find either to be
> (mostly) stable and useful, especially if old software is your only
> trouble with Debian squeeze.
Yeah, if it weren't for the older packages, I'd be content.
How do I migrate to testing or unstable: does it require a re-install
sirquij...@lavabit.com wrote at 2013-03-29 16:23 -0500:
> Apologies. Guess I'll just have to find a more appropriate OS.
As already mentioned, squeeze-backports might help, though neither
netatalk nor privoxy currently have more recent versions backported.
Consider building your own backports. O
sirquijote writes:
> I just got a reply on another list, and it drew my attention to the fact
> that Debian is an LTS OS.
Debian Stable is. For bleeding edge you want Unstable.
> I hadn't realised that would affect package availability too, so the
> mistake is mine.
You may also want to look at
end of 2011).
>
> I was looking for a stable, well-established and well-supported OS, but
> from the looks of things package maintenance may be flagging badly.
>
> Is that fair or have I just chanced upon two significant outliers? If so
> I'm pretty unlucky, considering net
g for a stable, well-established and well-supported OS, but
from the looks of things package maintenance may be flagging badly.
Is that fair or have I just chanced upon two significant outliers? If so
I'm pretty unlucky, considering netatalk and privoxy represent about 66%
of the total pac
r...@aarden.us wrote:
> just to assure that I can get a stable, usable system up and running,
> please see the list below.
A lot of what you've listed below should have been handled
semi-automatically during installation. It's a steep learning curve,
though, I'll agree with that.
What is wrong wi
I am sorry, I don't know why this did not post in-thread. So here is
another try.
Chris,
I wish I knew all the configuration topics. But just to assure that I
can get a stable, usable system up and running, please see the list
below. One important aspect is that I do not know everything that
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:02:09 -0700, ray wrote:
(now better, thanks for removing the annoying html)
> I would like to learn if there is a tool or method to help define what
> values configuration parameters should have.
Can you rephrase that stanza? I don't get it :-?
> I have seen short descr
Chris,
I wish I knew all the configuration topics. But just to assure that I can get a stable, usable system up and running, please see the list below. One important aspect is that I do not know everything that can be configured; while reading posts I keep seeing things I have never heard of.
r...@aarden.us wrote:
> I would like to learn if there is a tool or method to help define what
> values configuration parameters should have.
To which configuration parameters are you referring? Can you provide
some examples?
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.o
I would like to learn if there is a tool or method to help define what
values configuration parameters should have. I have seen short
descriptions of parameters but not much as to the impact or how any
values may impact other parameters.
It would be very hand to have an animated map that would
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:30:15 -0700, ray wrote:
(...)
Ray, please, no html formatted postings.. this one of yours it renders
like a pure gibberish.
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
I would like to learn if there is a tool or method to help define what values configuration parameters should have. I have seen short descriptions of parameters but not much as to the impact or how any values may impact other parameters.
It would be very hand to have an animated map that would
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:27:07 -0700, Weaver wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:51:05 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>>
> so I believe that, in the circumstances, I have to abandon the
> prospect of installing PC-BSD 9 on this computer.
>
> I
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:51:05 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote:
>
> (...)
>
so I believe that, in the circumstances, I have to abandon the
prospect of installing PC-BSD 9 on this computer.
I had some trouble with this myself and tried all sorts of thing
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:51:05 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>>> so I believe that, in the circumstances, I have to abandon the
>>> prospect of installing PC-BSD 9 on this computer.
>>
>> I already pointed out some alternatives and Keith told you about
>> vi
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:10:19 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
What recent operating system needs to be installed still in a primary
partition? Can you tell what OS are you going to install?
I want to try PC-BS
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:27:55 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:15:02 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message
> :
>
>> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:24:00 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
(...)
>> > As you can see, the permissions of the mount point have no influence
>> > on the permission
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:15:02 + (UTC), Camaleón wrote in message
:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:24:00 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > On Mi, 21 mar 12, 16:29:45, Camaleón wrote:
> >>
> >> For static mount points, this is usually done/set in "/etc/fstab".
> >> You basically need two things:
>
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:10:19 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> In addition to the explanation, show us the output of:
>>
>> fdisk -l
>>
>> So we can have an idea of the current state of your hard disk
>> partitions.
>>
>>
> "
> :~# fdisk -l
>
> Disk /dev/s
On 28/03/12 10:10, Bret Busby wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote:
I can, more or less, use Debian (I am still learning it, after however
many years), and PC-BSD would be a learning experience, and probably, a
fair bit of hard work (I haven't used BSD, since before GUI's), so it
appear
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Camaleón wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:47:27 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
(...)
The first is this; I have some empty partitions for storing data, and
they were created using the Ubuntu 10.04 installation (before I
installed Debian 6 on the system), and I need to know how to
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:57:18 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 26 mar 12, 15:15:02, Camaleón wrote:
>> >
>> > As you can see, the permissions of the mount point have no influence
>> > on the permissions of the files on the partition. This is true for
>> > about any filesystem that is more or
On Lu, 26 mar 12, 15:15:02, Camaleón wrote:
> >
> > As you can see, the permissions of the mount point have no influence on
> > the permissions of the files on the partition. This is true for about
> > any filesystem that is more or less native to Linux (ext*, xfs, etc.).
>
> I'm not sure about y
On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:24:00 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 21 mar 12, 16:29:45, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> For static mount points, this is usually done/set in "/etc/fstab". You
>> basically need two things:
>>
>> - Set the right permission options for the mount point so users can
>> read/ wr
On Mi, 21 mar 12, 16:29:45, Camaleón wrote:
>
> For static mount points, this is usually done/set in "/etc/fstab". You
> basically need two things:
>
> - Set the right permission options for the mount point so users can read/
> write/whatever
>
> - Create a mount point in your system with the r
On 21/03/12 14:47, Bret Busby wrote:
In my primary partition, I have three partitions. I have a hardware
manufacturer's partition, a recovery partition, and, as the computer
came with MS Windows, a Windows partition, which is 84GB.
Having inmstalled Ubuntu and Debian 6, I want to experiment with
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:47:27 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
(...)
> The first is this; I have some empty partitions for storing data, and
> they were created using the Ubuntu 10.04 installation (before I
> installed Debian 6 on the system), and I need to know how to access them
> as a user, to move and
Hello.
In investigating a problem to do with the UDF filesystem format, in
running the Disk Utility, I found the system hard drive partition table,
and have a couple of questions.
The first is this; I have some empty partitions for storing data, and
they were created using the Ubuntu 10.04 i
Dne, 13. 01. 2011 23:12:43 je ghe napisal(a):
On 1/13/11 2:45 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Jo, 13 ian 11, 14:38:44, Stephen Powell wrote:
The bottom line: NEVER respond to an e-mail from ANYBODY which
solicits
your userid and password, no matter how legitimate the e-mail seems
to be.
I
On 1/13/11 2:45 PM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Jo, 13 ian 11, 14:38:44, Stephen Powell wrote:
The bottom line: NEVER respond to an e-mail from ANYBODY which solicits
your userid and password, no matter how legitimate the e-mail seems to be.
I didn't -- that's why I asked here.
And it's also
On Jo, 13 ian 11, 14:38:44, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> The bottom line: NEVER respond to an e-mail from ANYBODY which solicits
> your userid and password, no matter how legitimate the e-mail seems to be.
And it's also a good idea to not reply to them on debian-user (makes
cleaning the archives im
Blake Hodder said the following on 1/13/11 1:59 PM:
I did as well but was not sure which it was.
On 11-01-13 02:48 PM, ghe wrote:
I got 3 of these this morning. Anybody else? Is it real? Or spam?
-snip-
These are called phish[1]. Looks like ucla.edu has a compromised account.
[1] http://en
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:22:01 -0500 (EST), green
wrote:
> ghe wrote at 2011-01-13 11:48 -0700:
>> I got 3 of these this morning. Anybody else? Is it real? Or spam?
>>
>> From: "Account Verification For This Year"
>
> Unless you actually have a ucla.edu account, this should be evidence enough
>
- Original message -
> Make sure to include your username and passwords for your bank accounts
> when you respond.
Todd has earned a point. This is the oldest scam I can think of, afterwards
they got more inventive and gave away mean incentives such as wooden horses.
Who do you think
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:59:21 -0400, Blake Hodder wrote:
> On 11-01-13 02:48 PM, ghe wrote:
>> I got 3 of these this morning. Anybody else? Is it real? Or spam?
> I did as well but was not sure which it was.
(...)
Phishing/spam, for sure... look:
***
To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@liszt.debian
ghe wrote at 2011-01-13 11:48 -0700:
> I got 3 of these this morning. Anybody else? Is it real? Or spam?
>
> > From: "Account Verification For This Year"
Unless you actually have a ucla.edu account, this should be evidence enough of
a phishing attempt.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signa
Make sure to include your username and passwords for your bank accounts when
you respond.
From: ghe [g...@slsware.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 1:48 PM
To: debian-users
Subject: maintenance
I got 3 of these this morning. Anybody else? Is it real
Old-Reply-To: accountactivat...@admin.in.th
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 02:30:36 -0800
Subject: currently carrying-out a Maintenance
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
ebian.org>
Old-Reply-To: accountactivat...@admin.in.th
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 02:30:36 -0800
Subject: currently carrying-out a Maintenance
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_=aspNetEmail=_fec30c335ee04b1b99b83d0a4c4e93bb"
X-Mailer: aspNetEmail ver 3.5.2.0
X-se
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:05:29 +0300
Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to get in touch with Bluetooth package maintainers, but no one
> responded so far. I found the e-mail address of Filippo Giunchedi from
> the mailing lists and sent him below message. As far as I understand,
> Nobuhiro Iwa
Hi,
I tried to get in touch with Bluetooth package maintainers, but no one
responded so far. I found the e-mail address of Filippo Giunchedi from
the mailing lists and sent him below message. As far as I understand,
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu appears to be the current "active" maintainer, but he
has no sig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Camaleón writes:
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:34:25 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>> Booting in `user-mode' (once chosen in the GRUB) and entering in
>> `maintenance' says `Login incorrect' but this is actually `Inco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Beretta writes:
> Il 03/07/2010 12:50, Camaleón ha scritto:
>> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:34:25 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>>
>>> Booting in `user-mode' (once chosen in the GRUB) and entering in
>>> `m
Il 03/07/2010 12:50, Camaleón ha scritto:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:34:25 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
Booting in `user-mode' (once chosen in the GRUB) and entering in
`maintenance' says `Login incorrect' but this is actually `Incorrect
password' that should be said, as `r
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:34:25 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Booting in `user-mode' (once chosen in the GRUB) and entering in
> `maintenance' says `Login incorrect' but this is actually `Incorrect
> password' that should be said, as `root' is the (default) ma
Hi,
Booting in `user-mode' (once chosen in the GRUB) and entering in
`maintenance' says `Login incorrect' but this is actually `Incorrect
password' that should be said, as `root' is the (default) maintenance
user. Or that could be understood if `login' were to
Maybe this is just me showing my ghetto side, but I took the Haynes manual
and my car's owners manual for scheduled maintenance and made a spreadsheet
that I print on 11x17 paper to log date and miles at time of maintenance. I
know every spring and fall it's maintenance time, so I do
Hi there,
I am looking for a software for logging my bikes maintenance. I found two:
Car Companion:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/car-companion
Versatile Maintenance Tracker
http://sourceforge.net/projects/vmt
But they both seems very old. Is anyone using something else ?
Thanks
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 07:45:43AM +0100, AG wrote:
> Hi
>
> Having recently upgraded to sid, I want to try to ensure that I am able
> to maintain a more or less stable system under those circumstances and
> in the full knowledge that, by definition, sid is unstable and may be
> subject to br
AG wrote:
> Hi
>
> Having recently upgraded to sid, I want to try to ensure that I am able
> to maintain a more or less stable system under those circumstances and
> in the full knowledge that, by definition, sid is unstable and may be
> subject to breakages.
>
> With this in mind, what do the m
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:34:19 +0900
Miles Bader wrote:
> AG writes:
> > As an aside, I noticed that none of the respondents picked up on the
> > scripts sxmi, et al. Is that because of a lack of experience with
> > these, or because they are no good, or possibly because they are
> > superfluous
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:09:34 +0200
Siggy Brentrup wrote:
...
> In my understanding there is no warranty whatsoever that testing /
> unstable won't burn your house, void the universe or whatever you can
> imagine.
Nitpick: *no* version of Debian, not even stable, comes with any
warranty, as per
AG writes:
> As an aside, I noticed that none of the respondents picked up on the
> scripts sxmi, et al. Is that because of a lack of experience with
> these, or because they are no good, or possibly because they are
> superfluous from the perspective of an experienced sid user?
I think such thi
AG:
>
> As an aside, I noticed that none of the respondents picked up on the
> scripts sxmi, et al. Is that because of a lack of experience with
> these, or because they are no good, or possibly because they are
> superfluous from the perspective of an experienced sid user?
I can only spea
AG wrote:
Hi
Having recently upgraded to sid, I want to try to ensure that I am
able to maintain a more or less stable system under those
circumstances and in the full knowledge that, by definition, sid is
unstable and may be subject to breakages.
With this in mind, what do the more experie
Tim Beauregard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AG wrote:
Having recently upgraded to sid, I want to try to ensure that I am able
to maintain a more or less stable system under those circumstances and
I manually use apt-get update then apt-get upgrade. If no packa
John Hasler wrote:
AG writes:
With this in mind, what do the more experienced sid users do in terms of
the daily updates of packages that come through - for example - the
Update Notification?
Nothing. I make no attempt to "track" Unstable. I keep an eye on what's
new and what is bein
Jochen Schulz wrote:
AG:
With this in mind, what do the more experienced sid users do in terms of
the daily updates of packages that come through - for example - the
Update Notification?
I usually install all available upgrades daily (or even twice a day)
using 'sudo aptitude update
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-07-27 02:32, Anthony Campbell wrote:
On 27 Jul 2009, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 07:45 +0100, AG wrote:
Hi
Having recently upgraded to sid, I want to try to ensure that I am
able to maintain a more or less stable system under those
circumstances an
Siggy Brentrup wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 07:45 +0100, AG wrote:
Hi
Having recently upgraded to sid, I want to try to ensure that I am
able to maintain a more or less stable system under those
circumstances and in the full knowledge that, by definition, sid is
unstable and may be subject
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
