Re: mailx-->logrotate-->lilo

Ethan Benson wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 09:48:06PM -0700, Mircea Luca wrote: > > > > Sorry for jmping in here,but then what is the solution to this > > small dilema : > > lilo depends on logrotate,logrotate depends on mailx > > lilo depending on logrotate is an absurdity is it not? > > >

Re: mailx-->logrotate-->lilo

On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 09:48:06PM -0700, Mircea Luca wrote: > > Sorry for jmping in here,but then what is the solution to this > small dilema : > lilo depends on logrotate,logrotate depends on mailx lilo depending on logrotate is an absurdity is it not? > So if I try to remove mailx I can't boo

mailx-->logrotate-->lilo

Ethan Benson wrote: > > it is NOT appropriate, no user should be a member of that group. > mailx simply can't be used to read mail any more. Deal with it. > > -- Sorry for jmping in here,but then what is the solution to this small dilema : lilo depends on logrotate,logrotate depends on mailx S