Mailbox for Sysadmin

Good day Administrator, Every self-respecting Admin should have a mailbox in worthy domain. Do you have it already? If no - go to https://nox11.com choose one and start new life. Common domains are for lames though. If you aren't interested accept apology for spam. --- Cheers ad...@

Re: Warning ---- Re: debian-user@lists.debian.org: Upgrading MailBox in Progress Verify Password

;s to avoid mail automatic enabled click-able links > > > > > > > > On 20/04/17 17:06, No Reply wrote: > > > > > Dear debian-user@lists.debian.org, > > > > > > > > > We receive an authority from you to close down your mailbo

Warning ---- Re: debian-user@lists.debian.org: Upgrading MailBox in Progress Verify Password

17:06, No Reply wrote: Dear debian-user@lists.debian.org, We receive an authority from you to close down your mailbox account which is in progress within 48hrs. note you will loose all your valuable mails in your inbox and sent folder, If you will like to continue using your mailbox you have

Uprgrade your mailbox quota

Date: 13 September 2016 Warmest Regards Selma Pineas Seleny Investments cc Clearing & Forwarding Shop no. 2, Town Centre Building Sam Nujoma Avenue, Walvis Bay, Namibia P O Box 987, Walvis Bay, Namibia Cell : +264 81 2474907 E-mail: sel...@iway.na Fax2

Re: Upgrade Your Mailbox Quota!!! (OT)

limpia: > Siard: > > Hundreds, if not thousands, of spam messages a day hit the Debian > > servers. Occasionally, a few slip through the filters. You'd better > > just ignore them. > > Yes I know, there is to many, and if it is obvious it is spam , > I do ignore them . > On this one it say my

Re: Spam 101 on Debian-User (was: Upgrade Your Mailbox Quota!!!)

On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:21:50 -0500 limpia wrote: > On 2016-08-15 12:31, Account-services wrote: > > Avoid [debian-user@lists.debian.org] suspension > > > Text cut, but I am sure every one has seen it, Of course not. Those of us who use real e-mail clients don't see spam usually. Even if it fall

Re: Upgrade Your Mailbox Quota!!!

limpia writes: > On 2016-08-15 12:31, Account-services wrote: > Avoid [debian-user@lists.debian.org] suspension > > Text cut, but I am sure every one has seen it, No. Some of us have spam filters. What are the headers? > Please forgive me if this sounds stupid, but I am not > sure, Is this for

Re: Upgrade Your Mailbox Quota!!!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:21:50 -0500 limpia wrote: >On 2016-08-15 12:31, Account-services wrote: >> Avoid [debian-user@lists.debian.org] suspension >> >Text cut, but I am sure every one has seen it, > >Please forgive me if this sounds stupid, but

Re: Upgrade Your Mailbox Quota!!! (OT)

On 2016-08-15 14:31, Siard wrote: On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:21:50 -0500, limpia wrote: On 2016-08-15 12:31, Account-services wrote: > Avoid [debian-user@lists.debian.org] suspension > Text cut, but I am sure every one has seen it, Please forgive me if this sounds stupid, but I am not sure, Is this

Re: Upgrade Your Mailbox Quota!!!

On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 14:21:50 -0500, limpia wrote: > On 2016-08-15 12:31, Account-services wrote: > > Avoid [debian-user@lists.debian.org] suspension > > > Text cut, but I am sure every one has seen it, > > Please forgive me if this sounds stupid, but I am not sure, Is > this for real ? Do we need

Re: Upgrade Your Mailbox Quota!!!

On 2016-08-15 12:31, Account-services wrote: Avoid [debian-user@lists.debian.org] suspension Text cut, but I am sure every one has seen it, Please forgive me if this sounds stupid, but I am not sure, Is this for real ? Do we need to do this, ? Why is the link not for debian-user@lists.debian.o

Mailbox is almost full

Your Mailbox (debian-user@lists.debian.org) usage is above 100MB, prior to the general system update, CLICK HERE to Upgrade your E-mail account to avoid any blockage or deactivation. NMSU Help desk Copyright 2016 © New Mexico State University. All rights Reserved.

Mailbox Update March 2016 (FINAL WARNING)

- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. - Dear debian-user@lists.debian.org, This is a courtesy notice from Admin Team, and it is to inform you that your email account has exceeded it's mail quota on the database server. Your email account will be blocked from sending

Mailbox Update March 2016 (FINAL WARNING)

- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. - Dear debian-user@lists.debian.org, This is a courtesy notice from Admin Team, and it is to inform you that your email account has exceeded it's mail quota on the database server. Your email account will be blocked from sending

Re: Bug#806858 Re: s-nail: mailx: Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied

Rick Thomas wrote: |On Dec 30, 2015, at 3:36 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: |> Rick Thomas wrote: |>|Hi Steffan, |> |> (My name is Steffen) | |Ooops! Sorry! Don't worry, i had so many typos myself in what followed.. .. |> It must be SETUID to a super-user that can impersonate as all

Re: Bug#806858 Re: s-nail: mailx: Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied

On Dec 30, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: > Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on 12/30/15 12:36: >> Hello! >> >> Rick Thomas wrote: > > >> |-rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 10104 Dec 4 14:52 /usr/lib/s-nail/s-nail-privsep > > Wouldn't these be enough rights for mailx to do it's work? > I.e., ow

Re: Bug#806858 Re: s-nail: mailx: Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied

/s-nail-privsep > -r-sr-xr-x 1 root root 9860 Dec 2 14:45 /usr/local/libexec/s-nail-privsep* > > It must be SETUID to a super-user that can impersonate as all > users and groups that mailx(1) may potentially open system > mailboxes for in order to give mailbox locks the UID

Re: Bug#806858 Re: s-nail: mailx: Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied

Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on 12/30/15 12:36: > Hello! > > Rick Thomas wrote: > |-rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 10104 Dec 4 14:52 /usr/lib/s-nail/s-nail-privsep Wouldn't these be enough rights for mailx to do it's work? I.e., owner: root, group: mail, sticky bit for the group? This works on my syste

Re: Bug#806858 Re: s-nail: mailx: Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied

14:45 /usr/local/libexec/s-nail-privsep* It must be SETUID to a super-user that can impersonate as all users and groups that mailx(1) may potentially open system mailboxes for in order to give mailbox locks the UID and GID of the mailbox they are ment for. Usually only root satisfies this. I thing

Bug#806858 Re: s-nail: mailx: Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied

Hi Steffan, So what, exactly, are the correct permissions for s-nail-privsep? Should it be: -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 10104 Dec 4 14:52 /usr/lib/s-nail/s-nail-privsep or: -rwsr-xr-x 1 root mail 10104 Dec 4 14:52 /usr/lib/s-nail/s-nail-privsep or: -rwsr-sr-x 1 root mail 10104 Dec 4 14:

Re: s-nail fails with "Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied"

f:~$ mail >> Creating dotlock for "/var/mail/rbthomas" . >> Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied >> Creating dotlock for "/var/mail/rbthomas" . >> Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied >

s-nail fails with "Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permission denied"

With recent Stretch installations the “mail” (or “mailx”) command is satisfied by the s-nail package. As it comes fresh out of the box, s-nail has a problem with dotlock files. For example: > rbthomas@half:~$ mail > Creating dotlock for "/var/mail/rbthomas" . > Unable to

Re: Mailbox, Mysql or Folder.

Once I used a mailbox and got cured of that in a hurry when clamav cut off access to the entire content of that mailbox because at least one of the messages in that mailbox had a virus clamav had detected. That was a windows virus too. I went with nmh after that since it uses folders with

Re: Mailbox, Mysql or Folder.

ere is no reliable way to restore a single mailbox, and if your server dies badly, there's pretty much no way to use even a backup of the database on any other hardware. The encryption of the database is tied into security numbers created with the OS installation. Excellent security for confid

Re: Mailbox, Mysql or Folder.

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Jochen Spieker wrote: > Kelly Clowers: >> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Jochen Spieker wrote: >> >>> I don't think there are many people (or organisations) that keep their >>> e-mails in relational databases. Sure, mail servers like Exchange (or >>> Dovecot) may

Re: Mailbox, Mysql or Folder.

Kelly Clowers: > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Jochen Spieker wrote: > >> I don't think there are many people (or organisations) that keep their >> e-mails in relational databases. Sure, mail servers like Exchange (or >> Dovecot) may have their own on-disk-format for mailboxes instead of >> pla

Re: Mailbox, Mysql or Folder.

o that of the ISPMail howto]. >> >> Muhammad Yousuf Khan: >> > >> > i am working in a small company 30 to 50 users, so which one is more >> > suitable for me a mailbox storage in a folder or database by keeping >> > in mind stability? >> >&g

Re: Mailbox, Mysql or Folder.

gt; i am working in a small company 30 to 50 users, so which one is more > > suitable for me a mailbox storage in a folder or database by keeping > > in mind stability? > > I don't think there are many people (or organisations) that keep their > e-mails in relational databases

Re: Mailbox, Mysql or Folder.

Jochen Spieker: > > For 50 users, I recommend to use Maildirs and make sure Dovecot's LDS is ^^^ Whoops. What I meant to write was "LDA". Not LSD and most definitely not LDS. :) J. -- I feel yawning hollowness whilst talking to

Re: Mailbox, Mysql or Folder.

[Disclaimer: I only run a mail server for mainly personal use. I have less than ten users on that system but the configuration is comparable to that of the ISPMail howto]. Muhammad Yousuf Khan: > > i am working in a small company 30 to 50 users, so which one is more > suitable for me

Upgrade Your Mailbox

Your mailbox has exceeded the limit of 20 GB, which is as set by your manager, you are currently at 20.9GB, you will not be able to create new e-mail to send or receive again until you validate your mailbox.To re-validate your mailbox,you can Click Here<https://spreadsheets.google.

Re: mailbox file permissions and timestamps

On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:11:08 +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote: > What are the correct mailbox file mode bitmasks in /var/mail? This is > what I have: > > :/var/mail$ ls -al > total 20 > drwxrwsr-x 2 root mail 4096 2011-03-30 10:00 . > drwxr-xr-x 16 root root 4096 2010-

mailbox file permissions and timestamps

Hi What are the correct mailbox file mode bitmasks in /var/mail? This is what I have: :/var/mail$ ls -al total 20 drwxrwsr-x 2 root mail 4096 2011-03-30 10:00 . drwxr-xr-x 16 root root 4096 2010-01-14 20:21 .. -rw--- 1 root mail 582 2010-04-13 21:31 root -rw--- 1 u1 mail 528 2011

Re: unable to open mailbox

On Tuesday 12 January 2010 7:58:30 pm Celejar wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:21:54 -0500 > > Rob Owens wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:12:05PM -0500, Celejar wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:05:15 -0500 > > > Rob Owens wrote: > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > Another benefit of maildir is

Re: unable to open mailbox

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:21:54 -0500 Rob Owens wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:12:05PM -0500, Celejar wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:05:15 -0500 > > Rob Owens wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > Another benefit of maildir is if you use a backup program that does file > > > pooling (like BackupPC

Re: unable to open mailbox

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:12:05PM -0500, Celejar wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:05:15 -0500 > Rob Owens wrote: > > ... > > > Another benefit of maildir is if you use a backup program that does file > > pooling (like BackupPC). Anytime an mbox changes, that's a new file to > > backup (and usua

Re: unable to open mailbox

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:05:15 -0500 Rob Owens wrote: ... > Another benefit of maildir is if you use a backup program that does file > pooling (like BackupPC). Anytime an mbox changes, that's a new file to > backup (and usually a big one). With maildir, only the new messages > have to be backed

Re: unable to open mailbox

/folders all day long. This is on a lightly > > loaded server. I'd like to see data for heavily loaded mbox and maildir > > servers. > > I would love to switch to maildir. I use clamav and it has the capability > of quarantining a file which test positive for malware.

Re: unable to open mailbox

difference in human waiting terms--unless your daily > job entails searching mail files/folders all day long. This is on a lightly > loaded server. I'd like to see data for heavily loaded mbox and maildir > servers. I would love to switch to maildir. I use clamav and it has the

Re: unable to open mailbox

hat message will be affected. >>> >>> But it slows down searches. >> >> That's the general wisdom regarding search performance, but I'm not so sure >> that >> its correct for modern systems and software. I haven't located any modern >>

Re: unable to open mailbox

. > > That's the general wisdom regarding search performance, but I'm not so sure > that > its correct for modern systems and software. I haven't located any modern > apples-apples benchmarks of mbox vs maildir. Dovecot supports both mailbox > formats and its mb

Re: unable to open mailbox

stems and software. I haven't located any modern apples-apples benchmarks of mbox vs maildir. Dovecot supports both mailbox formats and its mbox code has been heavily optimized. It would be nice to see this http://www.courier-mta.org/mbox-vs-maildir/ benchmark performed today but testing

Re: unable to open mailbox

On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:27:33AM -0200, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > Klistvud wrote: > > I've heard maildir is more robust than mbox in that regard. Can anybody > > confirm if that's true or not? > > > > I'd say so. Since each message is a file, if one file gets corrupted > only that messa

Re: unable to open mailbox

Klistvud wrote: > I've heard maildir is more robust than mbox in that regard. Can anybody > confirm if that's true or not? > I'd say so. Since each message is a file, if one file gets corrupted only that message will be affected. -- I met a wonderful new man. He's fictional, but you can't

Re: unable to open mailbox

fault location to save outgoing mail set mbox='+mbox' # where to store read messages set postponed='+draft' # mailbox to store postponed messages in set spoolfile='/var/mail/freeman' # where my new mail is located You can make

Re: unable to open mailbox

use ":0:" instead of ":0" in .procmailrc file, like this: :0: * ^To: .*bugs\.debian\.org debian-bugs But consider using Maildir format instead. It doesn't need lock files. With procmail you can do it by adding "/" after the mailbox name: :0 *

Re: unable to open mailbox

Dne, 09. 01. 2010 10:51:41 je Chris Jones napisal(a): Sounds like the mbox has been corrupted: I've heard maildir is more robust than mbox in that regard. Can anybody confirm if that's true or not? -- Regards, Klistvud Certifiable Loonix User #481801 http://bufferoverflow.tiddlyspot.com

Re: unable to open mailbox

> But since something must be moving your mail to Mail/mbox rather than > the default, I would take a look at your MDA's (procmail) configuration > as recommended by the mutt FAQ. i have invoked " fetchmail -v --mda /usr/bin/procmail" my procmailrc is ... { MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/m

Re: unable to open mailbox

On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 03:35:58AM EST, Jeffrin Jose wrote: > hello > when i try to open my mail box Mail/mbox it gives ...Mail/mbox is not > a mailbox but /var/mail/jeffrin works. here are some outputs.. > { > mbox: ISO-8859 mail text, with very long lines > /var/mail/jeffri

unable to open mailbox

hello when i try to open my mail box Mail/mbox it gives ...Mail/mbox is not a mailbox but /var/mail/jeffrin works. here are some outputs.. { mbox: ISO-8859 mail text, with very long lines /var/mail/jeffrin: ASCII mail text, with very long lines } why am i unable to read mbox ? /all thanks

Re: qla2xxx mailbox timeout crashes lenny

Does anyone have further information on this issue? We are in the process of setting up some new servers that will be using dual qlogic 2460 adapters w/multipathd connecting to an EMC SAN. We will likely be using LVM2 snapshots as well. We were hoping to use Debian 5.0 amd64 with the stock kerne

Re: Mailbox conversion

Just to mention the follow-up: I used kmail and its convert program on the old dbx files, and it worked fine. But the results were in maildir format (each message in a separate file), not in mbox format (a whole lot of messages in one file, which apparently Thunderbird/Icedove are used to). But som

Re: Mailbox conversion

Mark Grieveson wrote: [..] > If the idea of running a dos program on Linux nauseates you, > then I also read that Kmail, with the kmailcvt (kmail > converter) package installed also works. Actuallly I am quite a fan of dosemu (and even of DOS), but DOS can't handle filenames longer than 8+3, let

Re: Mailbox conversion

On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:50:29 + (UTC) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > After all this smalltalk, my real question: I still have lots of > old e-mail in Microsoft format (with names like in-2005.dbx, > out-2006.dbx, etc; some filenames are in Japanese, and the > messages inside the .dbx files are most

Re: Mailbox conversion

Jan Willem Stumpel: > > After all this smalltalk, my real question: I still have lots of > old e-mail in Microsoft format (with names like in-2005.dbx, > out-2006.dbx, etc; some filenames are in Japanese, and the > messages inside the .dbx files are mostly Japanese). I searched > the web for "conv

Re: Mailbox conversion

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/25/08 14:38, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: > Finally the motherboard of my wife's computer broke down, so I had > to replace it. I could not just get a new motherboard, because > they do not sell boards with "462" sockets anymore. The cheapest > solu

Mailbox conversion

Finally the motherboard of my wife's computer broke down, so I had to replace it. I could not just get a new motherboard, because they do not sell boards with "462" sockets anymore. The cheapest solution was an MSI motherboard with AMD-64 dual core and one gig of memory. You cannot get anything sim

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/18/08 02:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:13:32AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 03:34:31PM -0500, Owen Heisler wrote: >>> On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 15:09 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: On 09/27/06 14:05,

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:13:32AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 03:34:31PM -0500, Owen Heisler wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 15:09 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > On 09/27/06 14:05, Owen Heisler wrote: > > > > I think I've figured out how to get Evolution to work > > > > wi

qla2xxx mailbox timeout crashes lenny

8 hqhost kernel: qla2x00_mailbox_command(0): timeout calling abort_isp Feb 6 13:40:58 hqhost kernel: qla2x00_mailbox_command(0): timeout calling abort_isp Feb 6 13:40:58 hqhost kernel: qla2xxx :08:01.0: Mailbox command timeout occured. Issuing ISP abort. Feb 6 13:40:58 hqhost kernel: qla2xxx :08:0

qla2xxx mailbox timeout crashes lenny

rt(0): aborting sp 8101d01aa7c0 from RISC. pid=111928. Feb 6 13:40:58 hqhost kernel: qla2x00_mailbox_command(0): timeout calling abort_isp Feb 6 13:40:58 hqhost kernel: qla2x00_mailbox_command(0): timeout calling abort_isp Feb 6 13:40:58 hqhost kernel: qla2xxx :08:01.0: Mailbox command

Re: thunderbird: how to backup mailbox and restore quickly

[This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:31:34PM -0800, Cameron L. Spitzer wrote: >> > A very large file in >> > /var/mail was created instead. Any idea? >> >> That would be the default delivery. >

Re: thunderbird: how to backup mailbox and restore quickly

Your procmail file should end with this > > > > :0 > > /dev/null > > > > to prevent that. > > Won't that lose mail if any recipe fails? much better to :0 /path/to/a/catchall/mailbox/ mis-sorted mail is preferable to lost mail. A signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: thunderbird: how to backup mailbox and restore quickly

On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 11:31:34PM -0800, Cameron L. Spitzer wrote: > > A very large file in > > /var/mail was created instead. Any idea? > > That would be the default delivery. > Your procmail file should end with this > > :0 > /dev/null > > to prevent that. Won't that lose mail if any recipe

correction, Re: thunderbird: how to backup mailbox and restore quickly

[This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Yuwen Dai wrote: > > Now I move both Inbox and the expected result to my home dir. But command > > $ formail -s < Inbox |procmail /home/yuwen/rcfile Should be $ formail -s procmail /home/yuwen/rcfile < Inb

Re: thunderbird: how to backup mailbox and restore quickly

> The expected file /tmp/November didn't create. Maybe Procmail won't deliver in /tmp because everybody can read and write there. Maybe ^Received: .*;.*Nov 2006 doesn't match anything in the mail. Test that with egrep. Now I change the rcfile as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat rcfile :0: * ^Receive

Re: thunderbird: how to backup mailbox and restore quickly

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Yuwen Dai wrote: >[I wrote] >> $ formail -s < mboxfile | procmail recipefile >> >> recipefile looks like this: >> >> :0: >> * ^Received: .* myserver.example.net ;.* Dec 2006 >> /home/me/December > I created a similiar rc file like this: > >:0: > * ^Received:

Re: thunderbird: how to backup mailbox and restore quickly

$ formail -s < mboxfile | procmail recipefile recipefile looks like this: :0: * ^Received: .* myserver.example.net ;.* Dec 2006 /home/me/December :0: * ^Received: .* myserver.example.net ;.* Nov 2006 /home/me/November Hello Cameron, I created a similiar rc file like this: :0:

Re: thunderbird: how to backup mailbox and restore quickly

[This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: > Yuwen Dai wrote: >> I'd like to backup part of my Inbox, e.g., the emails of last year as my >> Inbox becomes larger and larger. I also want to restore and read the >> backup quick i

Re: thunderbird: how to backup mailbox and restore quickly

Yuwen Dai wrote: > I'd like to backup part of my Inbox, e.g., the emails of last year as my > Inbox becomes larger and larger. I also want to restore and read the > backup quick in thunderbird if need. What's your suggestion? How about creating a new folder, e.g., Inbox-2005. Then move all mails

Re: thunderbird: how to backup mailbox and restore quickly

Yuwen Dai wrote: >> >> >> "apt-cache search archive mail|sort" brings up, among other things: >> archivemail - archive and compress your old email >> archmbox - a simple email archiver written in perl > > > > These utilities are OK. But I think the point is, it's difficult to > restore and rea

Re: thunderbird: how to backup mailbox and restore quickly

"apt-cache search archive mail|sort" brings up, among other things: archivemail - archive and compress your old email archmbox - a simple email archiver written in perl These utilities are OK. But I think the point is, it's difficult to restore and read them back in thundbird.

Re: thunderbird: how to backup mailbox and restore quickly

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/02/07 02:29, Yuwen Dai wrote: > Dear all, > > I'd like to backup part of my Inbox, e.g., the emails of last year as my > Inbox becomes larger and larger. I also want to restore and read the backup > quick in thunderbird if need. What's your sug

thunderbird: how to backup mailbox and restore quickly

Dear all, I'd like to backup part of my Inbox, e.g., the emails of last year as my Inbox becomes larger and larger. I also want to restore and read the backup quick in thunderbird if need. What's your suggestion? I once backuped the whole inbox on a CD-ROM, and set the "local directory" on the

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 03:34:31PM -0500, Owen Heisler wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 15:09 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On 09/27/06 14:05, Owen Heisler wrote: > > > I think I've figured out how to get Evolution to work > > > without using imap. > > > > Using IMAP is definitely useful, though, si

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/27/06 18:59, Owen Heisler wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 17:25 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 09/27/06 15:34, Owen Heisler wrote: >>> On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 15:09 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: On 09/27/06 14:05, Owen Heisler wrote: > I think

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 17:25 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 09/27/06 15:34, Owen Heisler wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 15:09 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > >> On 09/27/06 14:05, Owen Heisler wrote: > >>> I think I've figured out how to get Evolution to work > >>> without using imap. > >> Using IMAP

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/27/06 15:34, Owen Heisler wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 15:09 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 09/27/06 14:05, Owen Heisler wrote: >>> I think I've figured out how to get Evolution to work >>> without using imap. >> Using IMAP is definitely usefu

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 15:38 -0500, Owen Heisler wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 14:38 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On 09/27/06 13:34, Owen Heisler wrote: > > > I did some more experimenting with Evolution, and found that if I make a > > > folder and then put the three folders in it (tmp, cur, new)

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

Owen Heisler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 15:09 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On 09/27/06 14:05, Owen Heisler wrote: > > > I think I've figured out how to get Evolution to work > > > without using imap. > > > > Using IMAP is definitely useful, though, since it breaks the lin

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 14:38 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 09/27/06 13:34, Owen Heisler wrote: > > I did some more experimenting with Evolution, and found that if I make a > > folder and then put the three folders in it (tmp, cur, new), that > > Evolution will work with it. I guess Evolution just

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 15:09 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 09/27/06 14:05, Owen Heisler wrote: > > I think I've figured out how to get Evolution to work > > without using imap. > > Using IMAP is definitely useful, though, since it breaks the link > between data and presentation. This is what I'm

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/27/06 14:05, Owen Heisler wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 23:00 +0400, Виталий Ищенко wrote: >> I've set up courier-imap >> And the only thing I have to edit in /etc/courier/imapd >> >> ADDRESS=127.0.0.1 (or whatever you like :) >> and >> MAILDIRP

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 23:00 +0400, Виталий Ищенко wrote: > I've set up courier-imap > And the only thing I have to edit in /etc/courier/imapd > > ADDRESS=127.0.0.1 (or whatever you like :) > and > MAILDIRPATH=.Maildir (relative to home folder) Okay, thanks. I think I've figured out how to get Ev

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

en Heisler wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 23:24 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >>>>>> On 09/26/06 20:08, Owen Heisler wrote: >>>>>>> I have set up a mail server using postfix and am using the maildir style >>>>>>> mailbox at &

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

;>>> On 09/26/06 20:08, Owen Heisler wrote: > >>>>> I have set up a mail server using postfix and am using the maildir style > >>>>> mailbox at "~/.mail". I have set up that account in Evolution and can > >>>>> view/delete messa

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

> On 09/27/06 09:55, Owen Heisler wrote: > > > On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 23:24 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > >> On 09/26/06 20:08, Owen Heisler wrote: > > >>> I have set up a mail server using postfix and am using the maildir style > > >>> mailb

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

en Heisler wrote: >>>>> I have set up a mail server using postfix and am using the maildir style >>>>> mailbox at "~/.mail". I have set up that account in Evolution and can >>>>> view/delete messages from that mailbox. I would like to

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 10:27 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 09/27/06 09:55, Owen Heisler wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 23:24 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > >> On 09/26/06 20:08, Owen Heisler wrote: > >>> I have set up a mail server using postfix and am using the

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/27/06 09:55, Owen Heisler wrote: > On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 23:24 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 09/26/06 20:08, Owen Heisler wrote: >>> I have set up a mail server using postfix and am using the maildir style >>> mailbo

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 00:50 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 11:24:58PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On 09/26/06 20:08, Owen Heisler wrote: > > > I have set up a mail server using postfix and am using the maildir style > > > mailbox at &qu

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 23:24 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 09/26/06 20:08, Owen Heisler wrote: > > I have set up a mail server using postfix and am using the maildir style > > mailbox at "~/.mail". I have set up that account in Evolution and can > > view/delete

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 11:24:58PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 09/26/06 20:08, Owen Heisler wrote: > > I have set up a mail server using postfix and am using the maildir style > > mailbox at "~/.mail". I have set up that account in Evolution and can > > The st

Re: Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/26/06 20:08, Owen Heisler wrote: > I have set up a mail server using postfix and am using the maildir style > mailbox at "~/.mail". I have set up that account in Evolution and can The standard location for maildirs is &quo

Evolution, a Maildir style mailbox, and folders

I have set up a mail server using postfix and am using the maildir style mailbox at "~/.mail". I have set up that account in Evolution and can view/delete messages from that mailbox. I would like to create folders in the mailbox as well. Is this possible with Evolution? Is is possibl

Re: Block messages for a mailbox from outside

particular mailbox and to reject all mail coming from outside (elsewhere). All hints will be appreciated. Switch to exim4. Configuring sendmail is a science on its own. It can be done with exim pretty easily. Exim is fun to configure. Are you really running sendmail?? GH -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Block messages for a mailbox from outside

Olafur Jens Sigurdsson said: > Dont know much about this, but the first thing that comes to mind is > procmail, apt-get install procmail and then man procmail. > Maby someone knows of a simpler solution. Perhaps spamassasin? These are not really efficient. My last look at Sendmail was about 1

Re: Block messages for a mailbox from outside

> I want to allow only local mail (from my domain) to be delivered to this > particular mailbox and to reject all mail coming from outside (elsewhere). Dont know much about this, but the first thing that comes to mind is procmail, apt-get install procmail and then man procmail. Maby someone kno

Block messages for a mailbox from outside

Dear List, I am using sendmail on a debian box to provide e-mail services for a small domain. One of the mailboxes gets spammed heavily. I would like to find out whether I can achieve the following task: I want to allow only local mail (from my domain) to be delivered to this particular mailbox

Re: converting mailbox format

Andreas Rippl wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:53:08PM +0100, Juraj Fedel wrote: > >>How do I convert mailbox from OutlookExpress to mbox format? >>Command line use is preferable. >> >>Juraj >> >> > > Hi Juraj, > > cvpoly2:~$apt-show rea

  1   2   3   4   >