Re: low latency kernel

2002-05-06 Thread Scott Wehrenberg
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 02:52:53PM +1000, Rob Weir wrote: > AFAIK (from reading kt), the low-latency patch has not made into any > of Linus' kernels. The kernel pre-emption patch has made it into 2.5, > but I wouldn't be playing with that right now;) > I've been using the pre-emption patch for ab

Re: low latency kernel

2002-05-06 Thread Josef Oswald
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 12:12:28PM +0200, Josef Oswald wrote: >> Hi:-) >> >> At this I use Kernel 2.4.18 with a >> 450MHZ CPU AMD-K3 <- I know it's /ancient/ these days :-) >> >> Now what I 'd like to know: do the newer Kernels still need the >> low-la

Re: low latency kernel

2002-05-05 Thread Rob Weir
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 12:12:28PM +0200, Josef Oswald wrote: > Hi:-) > > At this I use Kernel 2.4.18 with a > 450MHZ CPU AMD-K3 <- I know it's /ancient/ these days :-) > > Now what I 'd like to know: do the newer Kernels still need the > low-latency patch or not? AFAIK (from reading kt), t

low latency kernel

2002-05-04 Thread Josef Oswald
Hi:-) At this I use Kernel 2.4.18 with a 450MHZ CPU AMD-K3 <- I know it's /ancient/ these days :-) Now what I 'd like to know: do the newer Kernels still need the low-latency patch or not? As I did find 2-4.18-cr1-low-latency-patch I just would like to be sure, can I apply this patch to a D