On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:59:20 -0400, S.Squarepants
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While there may be a tool for it (I really don't know), that isn't the
> best way to do it IMHO. What would you do if you ending up sitting at a
> Fedora or Slackware box in the future that is missing the same tool?
>
>
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:03:36 -0500, dircha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Faheem Mitha wrote:
>> Thanks for the suggestion. It is possible that this is the problem,
>> and I'll investigate it. S1 does seem rather low. First I'll need to
>> learn the recommended way to manipulate runtime links in Debi
Faheem Mitha wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion. It is possible that this is the problem,
and I'll investigate it. S1 does seem rather low. First I'll need to
learn the recommended way to manipulate runtime links in Debian. If I
remember correctly, there is some tool to do specifically this.
update-r
On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 00:18:00 + (UTC)
Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 00:58:55 -0500, S.Squarepants
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have no idea if this will help you or not, but I once had a
> > problem with some other things that failed to work prior to the
On Sun, 04 Apr 2004 15:19:39 -0500, dircha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recall that lokkit never worked for me either. That prompted me just
> to learn how to use iptables manually, so I never figured out why lokkit
> was failing.
>
> After bringing it up manually, try:
> # iptables -L
> to be
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 00:58:55 -0500, S.Squarepants
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have no idea if this will help you or not, but I once had a problem
> with some other things that failed to work prior to the network being
> up. I doubt that's the case here, but it still might rely on something
> els
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 19:15:31 + (UTC)
Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear People,
>
> I have a minor but annoying problem with lokkit. It does not start at
> bootup. The runlevel look normal eg.
>
> etc/rc0.d/K99lokkit
> etc/rc1.d/K99lokkit
> etc/rc2.d/S01lokkit
> etc/rc3.d/S01lokki
Faheem Mitha wrote:
Dear People,
I have a minor but annoying problem with lokkit. It does not start at
bootup. The runlevel look normal eg.
etc/rc0.d/K99lokkit
etc/rc1.d/K99lokkit
etc/rc2.d/S01lokkit
etc/rc3.d/S01lokkit
etc/rc4.d/S01lokkit
etc/rc5.d/S01lokkit
etc/rc6.d/K99lokkit
but I get errors a
Faheem Mitha wrote:
Dear People,
I have a minor but annoying problem with lokkit. It does not start at
bootup. The runlevel look normal eg.
etc/rc0.d/K99lokkit
etc/rc1.d/K99lokkit
etc/rc2.d/S01lokkit
etc/rc3.d/S01lokkit
etc/rc4.d/S01lokkit
etc/rc5.d/S01lokkit
etc/rc6.d/K99lokkit
but I get errors a
Dear People,
I have a minor but annoying problem with lokkit. It does not start at
bootup. The runlevel look normal eg.
etc/rc0.d/K99lokkit
etc/rc1.d/K99lokkit
etc/rc2.d/S01lokkit
etc/rc3.d/S01lokkit
etc/rc4.d/S01lokkit
etc/rc5.d/S01lokkit
etc/rc6.d/K99lokkit
but I get errors at bootup which don
10 matches
Mail list logo