On Wed, Jul 15, 1998 at 11:41:26AM +, Patrick Meidl wrote:
> > > I recognized that all bootable partitions must start before the 1024th
> > > cylinder (I would like to use LILO), so I thought the best solution
> > > might be to have these partitions:
> >
> > With LBA this appears to be incor
> > I recognized that all bootable partitions must start before the 1024th
> > cylinder (I would like to use LILO), so I thought the best solution
> > might be to have these partitions:
>
> With LBA this appears to be incorrect. I have previously had systems
> booting Linux from the last 500mb o
e else have peculiar successes or failures?
Dave Jones
--
> From: Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: linux + win95: linux boot partition/1024 cylinder limit
> Date: Tuesday, July 14, 1998 8:35 PM
>
> On Tue
On Tue, Jul 14, 1998 at 06:42:19PM +, Patrick Meidl wrote:
> after reading the relevant FAQs, HowTOs, installation instructions etc.
> I recognized that all bootable partitions must start before the 1024th
> cylinder (I would like to use LILO), so I thought the best solution
> might be to ha
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
JonesMB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> furthermore, I would appreciate any suggestions for a better solution
>>> of the win95+linux shared documents problem.
>>give the other 1GB partition to linux and leave those docs on your lose95
>>partition and mount the part
>> furthermore, I would appreciate any suggestions for a better solution
>> of the win95+linux shared documents problem.
>give the other 1GB partition to linux and leave those docs on your lose95
>partition and mount the partition under linux and edit them :)
I have the same setup here. Proble
>
> after reading the relevant FAQs, HowTOs, installation instructions etc.
> I recognized that all bootable partitions must start before the 1024th
> cylinder (I would like to use LILO), so I thought the best solution
> might be to have these partitions:
Personally, I use loadlin to boot unix
On Tue, 14 Jul 1998, Patrick Meidl wrote:
> primary:
1) X MB linux native for booting linux
2) 1 GB fat16 for win95
3) extended:
4) 48 MB linux swap (=2x my RAM)
5) 1 GB linux native for linux apps
6) 1 GB fat16 for documents accessible for both win95 and linux
for ease I have indexed the par
>
> what is the minimal size for a linux /boot partition and what files
> must it contain?
>
> # the details:
>
> I am a win95 user and want to add debian 2.0 to my pc. on my 3.2 GB
> SCSI hard disk, I want to end up with the following approximate space
> distribution:
>
> - 1 GB for win95 (
# abstract:
what is the minimal size for a linux /boot partition and what files
must it contain?
# the details:
I am a win95 user and want to add debian 2.0 to my pc. on my 3.2 GB
SCSI hard disk, I want to end up with the following approximate space
distribution:
- 1 GB for win95 (OS and app
10 matches
Mail list logo
