On 22/03/11 06:54, Joey L wrote:
>(28 No space left on device)
df -h to check that
Maybe:-
#apt-get clean
first to make a little space, then:-
df -h
to see how much you've got free, then:-
#apt-get -f install !do not agree to proceed!
check the amount of space required - if it is less tha
On 03/21/2011 02:54 PM, Joey L wrote:
ate information... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libxml2-dev
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 10 not upgraded.
Need to get 774kB of archives.
After this operation, 2724kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http
ate information... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libxml2-dev
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 10 not upgraded.
Need to get 774kB of archives.
After this operation, 2724kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org lenny/main libxml2
they should not directly allocate memory,
*or* that they should have a Depends header on an exact version, *or* a
bug against libxml2 to not expose the structures in the public header
files. (If not another solution in the package management is being
taken.) Which one I don't know.
But i
opper, this means, using such
> types from header files would *always* be a bad thing, and hence, a
> library exposing such information in it's public header files should
> be treated buggy itself.
Does Debian have any existing policy covering this?
I'm not familiar with the lib
Chris Burkhardt wrote:
Thanks, Christian, for filing the report and spending your Saturday making stack
traces. I just upgraded to version 2.6.32.dfsg-3 of libxml2 from Unstable and it
works (thanks Mike!). Hopefully it will be in Lenny and Etch soon.
There has just been a new DSA 1631-1
Christian Jaeger wrote:
> I didn't at first (I had first thought since it is "fixed" in testing
> already the libxml2 maintainers would already have taken care of it); in
> my self-reply I then Cc'd the member of the security team who made the
> security-fixed
Hello to all,
Updated the libxml2 package from security updates yesterday. Booted
up this morning and Gnome is foobarred. For those you have not updated
from this security warning, DON'T. Unless you are comfortable working
from the commandline. Thanks for the heads up on that also, I th
.
Problem: the apps segfault inside libxml2, and thereafter enter a
deadlocked state in a mutex (or in a select call); the former is
apparently a bug in libxml2, the latter seems to be the Gnome
functionality to pop up a windows which seems to have an issue on it's
own (so it's reall
ll my Gnome
programs worked fine (including gnome-appearance-properties).
Downgrading libxml2 to the pre-security-update version fixed gdm, so now
everything works.
Have you opened a bug report on this anywhere?
I didn't at first (I had first thought since it is "fixed" in testi
victim.
>>
>> Symptom: Gnome apps just hang, without outputting anything to
>> stdout/stderr (or .xsession-errors if started through the menu).
>>
>> Problem: the apps segfault inside libxml2, and thereafter enter a
>> deadlocked state in a mutex (or in a select cal
rors if started through the menu).
>
> Problem: the apps segfault inside libxml2, and thereafter enter a
> deadlocked state in a mutex (or in a select call); the former is
> apparently a bug in libxml2, the latter seems to be the Gnome
> functionality to pop up a windows which seem
Christian Jaeger wrote:
Thanks in advance to the security team for fixing the fixes.
PS. in case it's needed here is some information:
- System is x86_64, core 2 duo
- see attached backtraces from two Gnome apps (xchat segfaulted too, as
did Ekiga iirc).
Christian.
#0 0x7f6038aa95c8 in
dout/stderr (or .xsession-errors if started through the menu).
Problem: the apps segfault inside libxml2, and thereafter enter a
deadlocked state in a mutex (or in a select call); the former is
apparently a bug in libxml2, the latter seems to be the Gnome
functionality to pop up a windows which seem
the issue;
since I first looked here and didn't find anything gnome related, I'm
sending this to the list for the casual other victim.
Symptom: Gnome apps just hang, without outputting anything to
stdout/stderr (or .xsession-errors if started through the menu).
Problem: the app
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:05:35AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:59:49AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:33:44AM +0200, Stephan Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> But:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ strings /usr/lib
t;current Debian Testing distribution.
> > >>
> > >>Besides OpenOffice.Org other programs linked against libxml2 also don’t
> > >>work:
> > >>scrollkeeper-update: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2:
> > >>undefined symbol: gzopen64
g the situation on two other machines (one 32bit, i386 and one
> >>64bit, amd64), this error does not occur. All three systems are the
> >>current Debian Testing distribution.
> >>
> >>Besides OpenOffice.Org other programs linked against libxml2 also don’t
urrent Debian Testing distribution.
Besides OpenOffice.Org other programs linked against libxml2 also don’t
work:
scrollkeeper-update: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined
symbol: gzopen64
What version of zlib1g do you have ?
All three systems have zlib1g version 1:1.2.3.3.
> Besides OpenOffice.Org other programs linked against libxml2 also don't
> work:
> scrollkeeper-update: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2:
> undefined symbol: gzopen64
I just did a dist-upgrade a few minutes ago (which includes of course the
new libxml) and oowriter ope
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:24:20PM +0200, Stephan Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> CCing the libxml2 maintainer list.
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 02:45:45PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
>> I have a problem with testing (32bit, i386): Since the update of libxml2
>&g
CCing the libxml2 maintainer list.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 02:45:45PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
I have a problem with testing (32bit, i386): Since the update of
libxml2 to version 2.6.30.dfsg-2 openoffice doesn’t work anymore:
”/usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: symbol lookup error:
/usr
Hi!
I have a problem with testing (32bit, i386): Since the update of libxml2
to version 2.6.30.dfsg-2 openoffice doesn’t work anymore:
”/usr/lib/openoffice/program/javaldx: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: gzopen64”
A downgrade to version 2.6.29.dfsg-1 fixes it
I have installed libxml2-2.6.17-2 which isn't in the offciail debian
repository, and I have it successfully installed. Now I need
libglademm-2.4-dev installed which depends on libxml2-dev-2.6.17-2 but
I get this:
libxml2-dev: Depends: libxml2 (= 2.6.16-7) but 2.6.17-2 is to be installed
Th
Incoming from CW Harris:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 10:34:58AM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> > I've been looking for xmllint which is supposed to be in libxml2. I
> > have libxml2 installed but no xmllint. Do I need a backport or am I
>
> Seems to be in libxml2-utils not i
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 10:34:58AM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> I've been looking for xmllint which is supposed to be in libxml2. I
> have libxml2 installed but no xmllint. Do I need a backport or am I
> just not finding it?
Seems to be in libxml2-utils not in stable[1]. libxml2-ut
I've been looking for xmllint which is supposed to be in libxml2. I
have libxml2 installed but no xmllint. Do I need a backport or am I
just not finding it?
Thanks.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~ke
> libxml2 2.4.19-2 in unstable is broken.
In fact, it sounds like any package which was built against it
might cause trouble with other version of libxml2.
The change was reverted in 2.4.19-3, but please check if
bug reports on pingus etc. are valid.
The most important question is:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 12:18:12PM -0700, David Wright wrote:
> > The previous one should still be in your /var/cache/apt/archives/
>
> Not if you installed on a fresh machine last night! This is what caused
> my un-installable and un-removable gnome packages, which I struggled
> with for 3 hou
The previous one should still be in your /var/cache/apt/archives/
Not if you installed on a fresh machine last night! This is what caused
my un-installable and un-removable gnome packages, which I struggled
with for 3 hours and which meant that my users currently cannot log in
under gnome.
o 2.4.19-1??
>
> cheers Peter van der Male
>
> >
> > libxml2 2.4.19-2 in unstable is broken.
> >
> > All programs using this library fail with :
> >
> > relocation error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: pthread_once
> >
> >
libxml2 2.4.19-2 in unstable is broken.
All programs using this library fail with :
relocation error: /usr/lib/libxml2.so.2: undefined symbol: pthread_once
This could be harmless but scrollkeeper use this library and then the
upgrade of a few packages (gnome packages) fail.
Downgrading to
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
> Nope. See my earlier message about the different effects using dselect
> and using apt have on the status file.
>
Thanks Gary and Colin. I stand corrected. Since I haven't used dselect
for over a year, my status file must be completely out of sync with
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 01:45:19PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> > But once I installed the -dev via apt-get, "dpkg -l *xml2*"
> > _did_ list the file.
>
> Sorry I didn't make that clear did I? dpkg -l only accepts *installed*
> package names.
Nope.
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 01:45:19PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
>
> > But once I installed the -dev via apt-get, "dpkg -l *xml2*"
> > _did_ list the file.
> >
>
> Sorry I didn't make that clear did I? dpkg -l only accepts *installed*
> package names.
relatives. In particular "apt-cache search xml2" would have shown you
what you wanted to see, eg.,:
% apt-cache search xml2
docbk-xml2x - Perl scripts to convert DocBk XML documents into troff
and Texinfo
docbook2x-doc - HTML docmentation of the docbook2x packages
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> But once I installed the -dev via apt-get, "dpkg -l *xml2*"
> _did_ list the file.
>
Sorry I didn't make that clear did I? dpkg -l only accepts *installed*
package names.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cool that works! But now comes the question, why didn't
> DPKG
> > tell me I had -dev, it didn't reported libxml2-dev when I
> did a
> > "dpkg -l *xml2*, only libxml2?
>
> dpkg -l doesn't work that way, it only accepts package names.
> Wha
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 12:48:31PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> > Cool that works! But now comes the question, why didn't DPKG
> > tell me I had -dev, it didn't reported libxml2-dev when I did a
> > "dpkg -l *xml2*
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> Cool that works! But now comes the question, why didn't DPKG
> tell me I had -dev, it didn't reported libxml2-dev when I did a
> "dpkg -l *xml2*, only libxml2?
dpkg -l doesn't work that way, it only accepts package n
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
>
> > So how do I get libxml2 to be reconized
> > correctly with xml2-config installed?
> >
>
> # apt-get install libxml2-dev
Cool that works! But now comes the question, why didn't DPKG
tell me I had -dev, it didn&
My guess would be you have the libxml-dev package install'd
and need to install the libxml2-dev package if you plan on compiling
code that depends on libxml2... Also if it is an already packaged
app that you are just trying to recompile you should be able to do
a 'apt-get build
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Hereward Cooper wrote:
> So how do I get libxml2 to be reconized
> correctly with xml2-config installed?
>
# apt-get install libxml2-dev
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I'm trying to compile a package that requires libxml2.
According to dpkg it's installed and has dependancys on it, but
when I try to ./configure the source of the package I'm
installing it says that it can't find it (it is trying to
search for xml2-config, but I only have
Is libxml2 (current version is 2.3.4, aka gnome-xml) going to be integrated
into stable at any point in the near future? It's necessary to get
PerlMagick to output SVG.
45 matches
Mail list logo
