Re: lchown(), libc6-2.0.7pre1, and 2.1.8x kernels

1998-02-12 Thread joost witteveen
In an attempt to save the world from disaster, Steve Hsieh wrote: > Doesn't appear to be good enough on its own... However, didn't Linus agree to change the kernels after 2.1.87 (or 88?) so that an old dpkg would work with the latest kernels? > > dpkg: error processing ssltelnet_0.11.1-2.deb

Re: lchown(), libc6-2.0.7pre1, and 2.1.8x kernels

1998-02-12 Thread Adam Heath
On Wed, 11 Feb 1998, Steve Hsieh wrote: > Doesn't appear to be good enough on its own... > > dpkg: error processing ssltelnet_0.11.1-2.deb (--install): > error setting ownership of symlink `usr/man/man8/in.telnetd.8.gz': No such > file or directory > dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal

Re: lchown(), libc6-2.0.7pre1, and 2.1.8x kernels

1998-02-11 Thread Gergely Madarasz
On Wed, 11 Feb 1998, Steve Hsieh wrote: > Doesn't appear to be good enough on its own... > > dpkg: error processing ssltelnet_0.11.1-2.deb (--install): > error setting ownership of symlink `usr/man/man8/in.telnetd.8.gz': No such > file or directory > dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal

Re: lchown(), libc6-2.0.7pre1, and 2.1.8x kernels

1998-02-11 Thread Steve Hsieh
Doesn't appear to be good enough on its own... dpkg: error processing ssltelnet_0.11.1-2.deb (--install): error setting ownership of symlink `usr/man/man8/in.telnetd.8.gz': No such file or directory dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) ii libc6 2.0.7pre1-1The

lchown(), libc6-2.0.7pre1, and 2.1.8x kernels

1998-02-11 Thread David Z. Maze
The lchown() function shows up in the most recent libc6 package. Is this on its own enough for dpkg to work happily with the 2.1.81+ kernels? -- _ / \ "The cat's been in the box for over | David Maze | 20 years. Nobody