LAME HACKER OF THE MONTH: OMKAR BELKHEDE

A 30 year old married guy, OMKAR BELKHEDE, working in FLAIR TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD, PUNE (http://in.linkedin.com/pub/omkar-belkhede/b/23a/37b ) is busy all day resetting passwords of other girls. http://www.facebook.com/people/Omkar-Belkhede/11794692629 http://www.facebook.com/people/Omkar-Be

LAME HACKER OF THE MONTH: OMKAR BELKHEDE

A 30 year old married guy, OMKAR BELKHEDE, working in FLAIR TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD, PUNE (http://in.linkedin.com/pub/omkar-belkhede/b/23a/37b ) is busy all day resetting passwords of other girls. http://www.facebook.com/people/Omkar-Belkhede/11794692629 http://www.facebook.com/people/Omkar-Be

Re: LAME for Lenny

On Thu,24.Dec.09, 20:19:12, Bernard wrote: > Hi to Everyone, > > On my older Sarge system, I used 'lame' to encode wav files to mp3. > However I can't find 'lame' for Lenny. Could someone tell me where > to find the appropriate package ? You already got

[SOLVED] Re: LAME for Lenny

Thanks to Everyone, I was able to install the lame package right after upgrading my sources.list with the multimedia repository. Alan Ianson wrote: On 24/12/09 11:19:12 AM, Bernard wrote: Hi to Everyone, On my older Sarge system, I used 'lame' to encode wav files to mp3. Howev

Re: LAME for Lenny

On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Bernard wrote: > Hi to Everyone, > > On my older Sarge system, I used 'lame' to encode wav files to mp3. However > I can't find 'lame' for Lenny. Could someone tell me where to find the > appropriate package ? You got so

Re: LAME for Lenny

On Thursday 24 December 2009 14:19:12 Bernard wrote: > Hi to Everyone, > > On my older Sarge system, I used 'lame' to encode wav files to mp3. > However I can't find 'lame' for Lenny. Could someone tell me where to > find the appropriate package ? T

Re: LAME for Lenny

On 24/12/09 11:19:12 AM, Bernard wrote: > Hi to Everyone, > > On my older Sarge system, I used 'lame' to encode wav files to mp3. > However I can't find 'lame' for Lenny. Could someone tell me where to > find the appropriate package ? Add debian-multim

LAME for Lenny

Hi to Everyone, On my older Sarge system, I used 'lame' to encode wav files to mp3. However I can't find 'lame' for Lenny. Could someone tell me where to find the appropriate package ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: using lame

Jean-François Pirlet wrote: This is only partly correct. The real answer is you can convert from any lossless format to lossy to acheive the desired results. WAV is uncompressed lossless audio data, whereas FLAC, Wavpack, etc. are lossless compression file formats that also have the ability to

Re: using lame

> Jean-François Pirlet wrote: The mp3 is to the CD what the abstract is to the book, if you want. If you have the book, you can write the abstract, but the other way round won't work. [snip] You could also go from mp3 320 to mp3 160 (gaining disk space but losing quality). But going from 160

Re: using lame

> This is only partly correct. The real answer is you can convert from > any lossless format to lossy to acheive the desired results. WAV is > uncompressed lossless audio data, whereas FLAC, Wavpack, etc. are > lossless compression file formats that also have the ability to store > ID3 tag info

Re: using lame

>>>>> 2009/10/28 steef hi folks, some times i use lame [...@lame --preset insane foo.mp3] to enhance existing mp3_files with 48Kbit >> 320Kbit. >>>>> Here's a good link that explains transcoding, which is what your question is about: http://wiki.hydr

Re: using lame

Raffaele Morelli wrote: 2009/10/28 steef mailto:debian.li...@home.nl>> hi folks, some times i use lame [...@lame --preset insane foo.mp3] to enhance existing mp3_files with 48Kbit >> 320Kbit. my question: does this r e a l l y gives an improvement of sound

Re: using lame

2009/10/28 steef > hi folks, > > some times i use lame [...@lame --preset insane foo.mp3] to enhance existing > mp3_files with 48Kbit >> 320Kbit. > > my question: does this r e a l l y gives an improvement of sound quality > [ceteris paribus] > No. You can achi

using lame

hi folks, some times i use lame [...@lame --preset insane foo.mp3] to enhance existing mp3_files with 48Kbit >> 320Kbit. my question: does this r e a l l y gives an improvement of sound quality [ceteris paribus] google came up only with some hunches. regards, steef,

Re: Where is Lame in Sarge?

. ## Am 2007-07-26 13:17:25, schrieb Hal Vaughan: > Neither toolame or glame provide lame itself. It's LPGL, does that > create a conflict with Debian's social contract? > "lame" can not distributed by debian, so you can find

Re: Where is Lame in Sarge?

On Sat July 28 2007 17:29, 2g wrote: > at their site > only > deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid main > is recommended for unstable > even though they have > deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org stable main > and > deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org testing main > maybe i should just try bu

Re: Where is Lame in Sarge?

at their site only deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org sid main is recommended for unstable even though they have deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org stable main and deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org testing main maybe i should just try but afraid of something get broken someone doing well wi

Re: Where is Lame in Sarge?

s file. I downloaded > debian-multimedia-keyring and installed it with dpkg. Then when I did > an update, there was no problem reading the Packages file. From there, > installing lame worked perfectly. I'm sorry I referred to etch. I looked up in my logbook how I installed lame

Re: Where is Lame in Sarge?

On Thursday 26 July 2007, Bob Proulx wrote: > Hal Vaughan wrote: > > I know there's an issue with MySQL and permissions with an easy > > work around, but other than that, I want to have time to check out > > known issues before I upgrade a server. > > Wise plan. In fact setting up a Sarge machine

Re: Where is Lame in Sarge?

Hal Vaughan wrote: > I know there's an issue with MySQL and permissions with an easy work > around, but other than that, I want to have time to check out known > issues before I upgrade a server. Wise plan. In fact setting up a Sarge machine as a victim for upgrade testing to Etch is a good idea.

Re: Where is Lame in Sarge?

o will be swapping routers with me tomorrow. I had several > other responses, but I didn't want to say anything until I had > confirmed we could swap. > > Thanks again! > > Hal > > On Thursday 26 July 2007, Hal Vaughan wrote: > > I have a server running Sarge. I tr

Re: Where is Lame in Sarge?

On Thursday 26 July 2007, Bob Proulx wrote: > Hal Vaughan wrote: > > Manon Metten wrote: > > > Hal Vaughan wrote: > > > > Neither toolame or glame provide lame itself. It's LPGL, does > > > > that create a conflict with Debian's social cont

Re: Where is Lame in Sarge?

Hal Vaughan wrote: > Manon Metten wrote: > > Hal Vaughan wrote: > > > Neither toolame or glame provide lame itself. It's LPGL, does that > > > create a conflict with Debian's social contract? The mp3 encoder is patented outside of the context of the softwar

Re: Where is Lame in Sarge?

On Thursday 26 July 2007, Manon Metten wrote: > Hi Hal, > > On 7/26/07, Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a server running Sarge. I tried to find lame and got this: > > > > > > Neither toolame or glame provide lame itself. It's LPGL, d

Re: Where is Lame in Sarge?

Hi Hal, On 7/26/07, Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a server running Sarge. I tried to find lame and got this: Neither toolame or glame provide lame itself. It's LPGL, does that create a conflict with Debian's social contract? Do I have to go out of the rep

Where is Lame in Sarge?

I have a server running Sarge. I tried to find lame and got this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:root]$ aptitude show lame Package: lame State: not a real package This was after trying to install it just by the name "lame." Then I did this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:root]$ aptitude search lame p fl

Re: installing LAME

Hi Roger, On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:56:04PM -0400, Roger Creasy wrote: > I just tried to install lame. When I run ./configure I get the following > error: 'configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables' Can anybody > out there help me out with this? Easie

installing LAME

I just tried to install lame. When I run ./configure I get the following error: 'configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables' Can anybody out there help me out with this? TIA Roger

Re: lame server

machines on the network so there shouldn't be that > much traffic. Lame servers are BIND's name for misconfigured nameservers. To disregard the messages, follow the configuration details as discussed in the bind manual [1] Just add something like this in /etc/bind/na

lame server

Hi, I'm seeing loads of these types of message from Bind Aug 29 13:40:35 sever named[7713]: lame server resolving '181.162.65.222.in-addr.arpa' (in '181.162.65.222.in-addr.arpa'?): 202.96.209.5#53 Aug 29 13:40:53 server named[7713]: lame server resolving '1

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

On 2005-08-18 13:15:23 +0800, csj wrote: > If that's the case the patent on mp3 should have expired by > now. There are several patents. See . -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

; > > > Just curious. Any reasons why the 'lame' package is not included in > > > > the debian package repository? > > > > > > Thanks to BMG Music, all MP3 encoders are non-free. Try a > > > patent-unencumbered format like Ogg Vorbis inst

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

http://ursine.ca/Top_Posting On Wednesday 17 August 2005 08:57 am, Javier-Elias Vasquez-Vivas wrote: > On 8/13/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Saturday 13 August 2005 10:05 pm, Rishi wrote: > > > Just curious. Any reasons why the 'lame' pa

Packaging of lame upstream (was: Re: lame not in the debian package repository?)

Hi, this is just an aside on this discussion. I am a member of the lame team and I am gradually upgrading things related to the Debian packaging of lame, since a new release (that is, lame 3.97) is expected to happen soon. If you use MP3 for your computers/devices and you use Debian, please let

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

On 17. August 2005 at 6:04PM +0200, Hans du Plooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Ogg (Vorbis audio) is a much more recent technology than mp3, twenty or > so years if I'm not mistaken. mp3 has been around a lot longer than it > has been popular, mostly because PCs only became strong enoug

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

Javier-Elias Vasquez-Vivas wrote: How about flac? Is there any comparisson between flac and Ogg in terms of compresion and sound quality? Flac is lossless compression. Almost like zipping a wav file, the compression is just optimised for the type of data in an audio stream. Ogg does the sa

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

How about flac? Is there any comparisson between flac and Ogg in terms of compresion and sound quality? Thx, Javier. On 8/13/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 13 August 2005 10:05 pm, Rishi wrote: > > > Just curious. Any reasons why the 'lame&#

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 10:33 -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 11:53:11PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote: > > > > He also incorrectly attributed the ownership of the patent(s). > > Just for the record, what *is* the proper patent attribution? The Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated C

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 11:53:11PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote: > > He also incorrectly attributed the ownership of the patent(s). Just for the record, what *is* the proper patent attribution? -- hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

On Saturday 13 August 2005 11:40 pm, Rishi wrote: > > As Paul pointed out, it is better to use a tool that implements a > > patent-free algorithm. > > Hmm. Then I guess I screwed up when I bought the Sony USB NS-11 MP3 > Player (512 MB). I tried to play an OGG file on the device, but no > joy. > >

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

On Monday 15 August 2005 04:37, Hans du Plooy wrote: > I really couldn't care if mp3 is free or not, it doesn't cost anything > to compile lame and it doesn't cost anything to play back mp3s either, > so what's the fuss? Another poster correctly stated it isn't

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

On Monday 15 August 2005 10:37, Hans du Plooy wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > But the point still stands, if you want free you use Ogg. If you want > > wrong, go with MP3. > > I really couldn't care if mp3 is free or not, it doesn't cost anything > to compile la

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

Paul Johnson wrote: But the point still stands, if you want free you use Ogg. If you want wrong, go with MP3. I really couldn't care if mp3 is free or not, it doesn't cost anything to compile lame and it doesn't cost anything to play back mp3s either, so what's the fuss

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

On Sunday 14 August 2005 08:25 am, Marc Wilson wrote: > On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:45:21PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Then you should use MS Windows. :-/ > > I do, for some things. For other things, I use Linux, for still other > things I use oBSD, and for yet more things, I use MacOS X. B

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:45:21PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Then you should use MS Windows. :-/ I do, for some things. For other things, I use Linux, for still other things I use oBSD, and for yet more things, I use MacOS X. -- Marc Wilson | Behind every great computer sits a skinny

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

On 2005-08-13 23:53:11 -0700, Marc Wilson wrote: > Paul did not point out that it was better to use a tool that > implements a patent-free algorithm. He merely made the usual "use > Vorbis!" knee-jerk reaction. > > Personally, I find "more widely supported" a compelling measure of > "better". The

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

Rishi: > > Does anyone know of hardware ogg players (usb) that I can buy? This question was answered just a couple of days ago. Search for "Portable OGG Player". My recommendation: Iriver H120 (or H140, for 40GB instead of 20). J. -- I frequently find myself at the top of the stairs with absolu

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 01:38:52AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > As Paul pointed out, it is better to use a tool that implements a > patent-free algorithm. Paul did not point out that it was better to use a tool that implements a patent-free algorithm. He merely made the usual "use Vorbis!"

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

> As Paul pointed out, it is better to use a tool that implements a > patent-free algorithm. Hmm. Then I guess I screwed up when I bought the Sony USB NS-11 MP3 Player (512 MB). I tried to play an OGG file on the device, but no joy. Does anyone know of hardware ogg players (usb) that I can buy?

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

On August 13, 2005 22:38, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > As Paul pointed out, it is better to use a tool that implements a > patent-free algorithm. Yes, but unfortunately my car stereo only plays mp3's RJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:22:52PM -0700, Roy Pluschke wrote: > On August 13, 2005 22:05, Rishi wrote: > > Hi > > > > Just curious. Any reasons why the 'lame' package is not included in > > the debian package repository? > > > > Regards > &

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

On August 13, 2005 22:05, Rishi wrote: > Hi > > Just curious. Any reasons why the 'lame' package is not included in > the debian package repository? > > Regards Legal reasons -- mp3 encoding is patented. Use ftp://ftp.nerim.net as a repository for lame, mplayer,

Re: lame not in the debian package repository?

On Saturday 13 August 2005 10:05 pm, Rishi wrote: > Just curious. Any reasons why the 'lame' package is not included in > the debian package repository? Thanks to BMG Music, all MP3 encoders are non-free. Try a patent-unencumbered format like Ogg Vorbis instead. pgpdv1anmYE7R

lame not in the debian package repository?

Hi Just curious. Any reasons why the 'lame' package is not included in the debian package repository? Regards -- Rishi

ACPI (WAS: Re: [I'm too lame to use Subjects...])

--- wolfgang pauli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a acpi problem under debian testing. It would have been nice to have seen that reflected in the topic. > No support for device type: thermal > > Maybe a ls of my /proc/acpi helps: > ac_adapter battery embedded_controller fan

Re: linux bewbie lame question - word wrapping

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas Janssen wrote: Kent West (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: Mild Netiquette Training: 4] Use line wrapping how do I find out if I have word wrapping on? I use Mozilla-Firebird browser and Horde mail client for my webmail. I do I fin

Re: linux bewbie lame question - word wrapping

Citát Andreas Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello > > Kent West (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > > > Andreas Janssen wrote: > > > >>Kent West (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > >>> > >>>Mild Netiquette Training: > >> > >>4] Use line wrapping > >> > > > > Is my text not wrapping? I'm using mozilla

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Andreas Janssen wrote: Hello Kent West (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: Andreas Janssen wrote: Kent West (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: Mild Netiquette Training: 4] Use line wrapping Is my text not wrapping? I'm using mozilla-thunderbird, and I have it configured to wr

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Hello Kent West (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > Andreas Janssen wrote: > >>Kent West (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: >>> >>>Mild Netiquette Training: >> >>4] Use line wrapping >> > > Is my text not wrapping? I'm using mozilla-thunderbird, and I have it > configured to wrap plain text messages at

Re: linux bewbie lame question

On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 11:06:19 -0600, Kent West wrote: > > I want to "do the right thing", so let me know one way or the other > please, and if I'm not wrapping, I'll take any hints as to why not when > it seems that moz-thunderbird is correctly configured. This post of yours to which I'm reply

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Colin Watson wrote: On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 11:06:19AM -0600, Kent West wrote: Andreas Janssen wrote: Kent West (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: Mild Netiquette Training: 4] Use line wrapping Is my text not wrapping? It looks fine to me. What's happening is that you

Re: linux bewbie lame question

On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 11:06:19AM -0600, Kent West wrote: > Andreas Janssen wrote: > >Kent West (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > >>Mild Netiquette Training: > > > >4] Use line wrapping > > Is my text not wrapping? I'm using mozilla-thunderbird, and I have it > configured to wrap plain text message

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Andreas Janssen wrote: Hello Kent West (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: Mild Netiquette Training: 4] Use line wrapping Is my text not wrapping? I'm using mozilla-thunderbird, and I have it configured to wrap plain text messages at 72 chars. However, I compose my mail with the HTML edit

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Citát Tendril <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > FYI it wasn't me (the person who asked about the difference between kde & > gnome) that berated the person who suggested that I use my browser and > google. Don`t worry about it. I personaly think that if somebidy doesn`t enough patience to help should not eve

Re: linux bewbie lame question

FYI it wasn't me (the person who asked about the difference between kde & gnome) that berated the person who suggested that I use my browser and google. BTW I am familiar with using a search engine, but for a newbie there is sometimes too much information, or it is of a technical nature. What I wa

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Citát Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:47:45 -0500 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Quoting Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:34:51 -0500 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > Citát Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > On Tue,

Re: linux bewbie lame question

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:36:57 -0700 "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Incoming from Katipo: > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:34:51 -0500 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Citát Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 13:00:58 +, Tendril wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: linux bewbie lame question

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:47:45 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:34:51 -0500 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Citát Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 13:00:58 +, Tendril wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Incoming from Katipo: > On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:34:51 -0500 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Citát Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 13:00:58 +, Tendril wrote: > > > > > > > What are the major differences between gnome and kde? > > > > > I am newbie and this is my

Re: linux bewbie lame question

On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 17:47:45 -0500, linux wrote: > > Was that for me? If yes what was it for? If it was for me than I appologize and > just on the side arogance come from the words above mine, I mean your. I am not > doing to agrue with you, it never makes sence, I may not be very technicaly > kn

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Katipo wrote: I am newbie and this is my experience. Gnome runs faster and gives me less trouble :)) KDE is more fancy and has more sofisticated aplications in it. If you boot to any of those you have them both available, for some reason some KDE stuff is on strike when run from Gnome in that case

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Hello Tendril (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: >> I'm no expert, but I _think_ what you need to do is install the alsa >> modules for your kernel. Find out which kernel you have with "uname >> -a". For example, on my box this command results in: >> >> Linux acureg 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:4

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Quoting Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:34:51 -0500 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Citát Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 13:00:58 +, Tendril wrote: > > > > > > > What are the major differences between gnome and kde? > > > > > I am newbie

Re: linux bewbie lame question

"Andreas Janssen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello > Looks like cs46xx might be the right driver. Try > > modprobe cs46xx returned: modprobe: Cant locate module cs46xx > > best regards > Andreas Janssen thanks tho' T -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [

Re: linux bewbie lame question

On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:34:51 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Citát Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 13:00:58 +, Tendril wrote: > > > > > What are the major differences between gnome and kde? > > > I am newbie and this is my experience. Gnome runs faster and gives m

Re: linux bewbie lame question

hi > I'm no expert, but I _think_ what you need to do is install the alsa > modules for your kernel. Find out which kernel you have with "uname -a". > For example, on my box this command results in: > > Linux acureg 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 unknown for me: Linux

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Hello Kent West (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > Mild Netiquette Training: > > 1] It's not a good idea to mix topics in a thread. Since Konqueror has > nothing to do with your sound issues, you probably should start a new > thread. > > 2] Try to use a descriptive subject line when starting a thre

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Hello (Quoting fixed again. That looked really strange) Tendril (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > Kent West (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: >> If so, the error message you're getting is now probably a different >> error. >> Rather than saying "permission denied", it probably says something >> like "n

Re: linux bewbie lame question

On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 08:34:54 -0600, Kent West wrote: > > -- > Mild Netiquette Training: > > 1] It's not a good idea to mix topics in a thread. Since Konqueror has > nothing to do with your sound issues, you probably should start a new > thread. > > 2] Try to use a descriptive subject line

Re: linux bewbie lame question

hi.. many thanks for responding. > Tendril, welcome it looks like you were thrown to the wolves on this > one, how did you get Debian on your Laptop? Did you buy it > preinstalled, or did you install it yourself? Did any one give you a > lesson on using Linux in general? > We really need to kn

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Tendril wrote: yes, the error now says "no device" I logged into a terminal as root, changed to the /dev directory ant typed: lspci Here are the results: 00:05.0 multimedia audio controller: cirrus logic cs 4614/22/24 [crystalclear soundfusion audio accelerator] (rev 01) So this is your so

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Citát Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 13:00:58 +, Tendril wrote: > > > What are the major differences between gnome and kde? > I am newbie and this is my experience. Gnome runs faster and gives me less trouble :)) KDE is more fancy and has more sofisticated aplications

Re: linux bewbie lame question

On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 13:00:58 +, Tendril wrote: > What are the major differences between gnome and kde? You happen to have a browser available ? - Good. Then it's time to leave this list for a moment and start to google. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "uns

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Hi > What does "ls -l /dev/dsp" say? > Did you log out and in again? > What does groups say? it says: crw-rw 1 root audio14, 3 Mar 14 2002 dsp Hope this sheds some light on the problem. Thanks Tendril -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Hi > If so, the error message you're getting is now probably a different error. Rather than saying "permission denied", it probably says something like "no device". Double-check the error message and let us know one way or the other. > > If the error has changed as I suspect, that probably means

Re: linux bewbie lame question

> From: Tendril <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Today 06:42:55 >When I said I was a noob.. I mean it. I've had the laptop for a week. I >have >never run anything as root. I can only log in through a terminal as >root. I don't know what xmms is, sorry.:( Tendril, welcome it looks like you were th

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Tendril wrote: "Andreas Janssen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tendril (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: I was given a thinkpad with debian woody installed (no billyware). It boots lovely except for the audio. I get this message at logon: error while initialising s

Re: linux bewbie lame question

I am running a thinkpad with PIII 800mhz 128MB ram so it's not a really low spec machine. What are the major differences between gnome and kde? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Citát Debian User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:44:43AM -, Ten

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Hello (quoting repaired, please go to , this makes it easier for all of us to understand the messages) Tendril (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > "Andreas Janssen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Tendril (<[EMAIL PR

Re: linux bewbie lame question

When I said I was a noob.. I mean it. I've had the laptop for a week. I have never run anything as root. I can only log in through a terminal as root. I don't know what xmms is, sorry. :( "Debian User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:44:43A

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Citát Debian User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:44:43AM -, Tendril wrote: > > What happens when you ran xmms or another audio as root ? > > -- > > > Hi Andreas. I have added my user to the audio group (in fact I have added > it > > to all groupes

Re: linux bewbie lame question

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:44:43AM -, Tendril wrote: What happens when you ran xmms or another audio as root ? -- > Hi Andreas. I have added my user to the audio group (in fact I have added it > to all groupes for now) and changed the file permissions (chmod 660 dsp)

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Hi Andreas. I have added my user to the audio group (in fact I have added it to all groupes for now) and changed the file permissions (chmod 660 dsp) but I still get the error. Help please. Also, why would I get problems with konqeror when I have logged into a terminal as su? It just hangs, even

Re: linux bewbie lame question

Hello Tendril (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > , I previously posted this on linux.debian.laptop but was informed > that it wasn't the correct forum for this so here goes again.: > >> >> I was given a thinkpad with debian woody installed (no billyware). >> It boots lovely except for the audio. I g

linux bewbie lame question

hrough a terminal so some > easy instructions would be very welcome) I can't find /dev/dsp. I'm in no way familier with the linux file system. I looked using konquerer... /root/dev but it contained no /dsp. sorry it's lame Tendril -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

Re: Where can I get lame for "testing"

stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > lame appears in dselect, and I've tried to install it that way, but > it does not install. I've tried apt-get install lame, and I get "No > installation caidate" > > What can I do to fix this? Use (DFSG-free, not pate

Re: Where can I get lame for "testing"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 07:47:07PM -0400, stan wrote: > I'm setting up a new "testing" machine/ > > lame appears in dselect, and I've tried to install it that way, but it does > not install. I've tried apt-get ins

Re: Where can I get lame for "testing"

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:47:07 -0400, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm setting up a new "testing" machine/ > > lame appears in dselect, and I've tried to install it that way, but it > does not install. I've tried apt-get install lame, and I get &qu

Re: Where can I get lame for "testing"

> lame appears in dselect, and I've tried to install it that way, but it does I dont think lame is in debian (http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=lame&searchon=names&subword=1&version=testing&release=all) ... try searching apt-get.org. --

  1   2   >