quick note, the bug report has been filed: 919227
Il 09/01/19 00:07, Michael Lange ha scritto:
Just because it is old does not necessarily mean that no one bothers.
Sorry, that's not what I meant: I wanted to say the kernel is so old
that it probably doesn't really matter if it is the debian or the
upstream version I am using. That is, wh
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 17:44:04 +0100
Andrea Borgia wrote:
> Il 07/01/19 20:09, Michael Lange ha scritto:
>
>
> > Since the error message looks different from yours I guess that this
> > is probably a completely different issue, though.
>
> Most likely you're right, however there was quite a
Il 07/01/19 20:09, Michael Lange ha scritto:
Since the error message looks different from yours I guess that this is
probably a completely different issue, though.
Most likely you're right, however there was quite a big rewrite of ACPI
in 4.10 and I wouldn't rule it out completely.
I bel
Hi,
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 20:11:53 +0100
Andrea Borgia wrote:
(...)
>
> dmesg has this interesting warning:
> ACPI: button: The lid device is not compliant to SW_LID.
oddly, here with my Lenovo Ideapad 100s the lid switch stopped working,
too. However, this is totally different hardware and I do
Il 04/01/19 20:11, Andrea Borgia ha scritto:
What's the best way to handle this? IMHO it's quite likely a kernel
issue, most likely upstream.
Should I file a bug on linux-image-amd64 or directly on
bugzilla.kernel.org?
No comments?
Meanwhile, I've been testing the kernels archived on snaps
Hi.
On my EEEpc 1215p laptop, the upgrade from stable to testing broke the
lid switch detection, since
* another OS detects it just fine and acts on it;
* the kernel from stable (4.9.0-7) does too
Therefore, HW is ok (not obvious on an old laptop...)
If I use the current kernel in testing (4
7 matches
Mail list logo
